© AFP 2016/Paul J. RichardsThe day breaks behind the White House in Washington,DC.
Donald Trump, commenting on the passing of Fidel Castro, branded him a mere "dictator". Whatever the long-lasting results (and mistakes) of the Cuban experiment,
History has already de facto recognized Fidel as one of the great revolutionary leaders of the modern - and post-modern - era.Trump - historical irony obliges - also has all but christened the groundswell of anger that delivered him the White House as a "
revolution" - led by, and in the name of, white, non-college educated, blue collar US masses.
Yet old habits die hard. A self-appointed "leader of the free world", true to conventional script, could never pay tribute in public to a "communist" who escaped over 600 CIA assassination cum regime change attempts - which is quite a heavy load to bear for so-called US "intel". In the end, it was nature's clock - not a magic bullet โ that took Fidel away.
With the Cuban revolution now history, the focus switches to the current American "revolution" - which might turn out to be quite the regime change special the CIA dreams of (for others). If Fidel was The Prince as well as Machiavelli rolled into one, in gringoland the storyline may be largely about Steve Bannon, the blue collar-meets-Goldman Sachs Machiavelli to Prince Trump.
White House chief strategist Bannon has been vilified, over the top, all across the spectrum, as neo-fascist, white nationalist, racist, sexist and anti-Semite. So far, this has been the most detailed explanation of the
Bannon agenda โ in his own words. One underestimates him at one's own peril.
Comment: See also: