Kanye West changes his mind about Jewish people

Almost no one I know understands the difference.

Does anyone think Ye does not understand that Khazarian Ashkenazi Jews are not Semitic?

Does anyone think Ye does not understand that Khazarian Ashkenazi Jews are not Semitic?

[...]Of course, I didn't completely discount some sort of Exodus from Egypt, such as the Hyksos leaving en masse, and somewhere in there was the eruption of the Santorini volcano[21], Thera, which probably added a few stories to the mix. [...] Ipuwer Papyrus [...] [pgs.22-23]

[...]

[...]It was only after the Assyrians imposed their imperialistic domination on the region that 'the poorer, more remote, and ore religiously conservative individuals'--followers of a strange tribal god, Yahweh--formed a cultic center at Jerusalem. It was members of this cult that later utilized many ancient texts to literally create the false history of Israel and it was in those stories that the names were forever inscribed in the minds of the people and could not be erased, nor changed, leaving testimony to the truth[313].

A very ancient temple in the environs of Jerusalem is known to have been built by the Hyksos[314], but it was never a temple of Yahweh until extremely late, if it was ever a temple of Yahweh at all. It may very well be that the first temple of Yahweh was actually the one built by the small number of individuals who were sent to Palestine from Babylonian 'captivity' by Cyrus. The archaeological record shows that no more than 25%of the population was actually deported, and when descendants of this select group were sent back to establish an outpost of the Persian empire to guard the trade routes, they resued to integrate with the people of the land--the descendants of the 75% of people that ha not been deported. That suggests strongly that the Yahweh cult had actually grown up and refined itself in Babylon and was not, actually, the religion of the ancient Hebrews resident in Palestine. However, even now it is uncertain what god was actually worshipped in the new temple, considering some later evidence that we will get to shortly. It is entirely possible that Herod's alleged temple was the first, truly Jewish --as in, exclusive worship of Yahweh-Jehovah--temple ever built, and it was built based on myth and legend that a former temple of Yahweh had existed since the time of Solomon. We are told by Josephus that Herod completely rebuilt the Temple, even replacing the foundation stones , which suggests strongly that whatever temple was rebuilt by the returned exiles wasn't much of a temple. On the other hand, contradictions to that story exist.[...][pgs. 202-203]

[...]

Thus Lewy concludes that David and Solomon--who she considered to be historical characters--built a temple to honor Saturn and it was the worship of this god that they sought to impose on their subjects, the early Hebrews. If that is the case, then I would suggest that it occurred back in Hyksos times after they made their Exodus from the Nile Delta at the time of the eruption of Thera (1645-1600) and established themselves in Palestine.[pg. 218]

I would like to note right here that this was not happening because somebody came along and said, "hey, let's trash the Bible"! Nope. It was happening because there were glaring problems , and each and every researcher working on this throughout the centuries was struggling mightily to retain the textus receptus status of the Bible! The only exception to this that I have mentioned in this whole chain of events is our curious guy Abraham ibn Ezra, who KNEW about problems in the tet of the Torah in the 12th century and enjoined others to silence! Remember what he said? " And if you understand, then you will recognize the truth. And he who understands will keep silent ." What do we see as the result of this silence? Over eight hundred years of Crusades, the Inquistion, and general suppression, and in our present day, the wars between the Israelis and Palestinians based on the claim that Israel is the Promised Land, and that it "belongs" to the Jews. Which brings us to another startling bit of information.

The great Jewish scholar, Rashi de Troyes, (1040-1105), makes the astonishingly frank statement that the Genesis narrative, going back to the creation of the world, was written to justify what we might now call genocide . The God of Israel, who gave his people the Promised Land, had to be unequivocally supreme so that neither the dispossessed Canaanites nor anyone else could ever appeal against his decrees[251]. Rashi's precise words were that God told us the creation story and included it in the Torah, " to tell his people that they can answer those who claim that the Jews stole the land from its original inhabitants. The reply should be: God made it and gave it to them but then took it and gave it to us. As he made it and it's his, he can give it to whoever he chooses ".

The fact is, the Jews are still saying this, with the support of many Christian Fundamentalists whose beliefs are being pandered to by George Bush and his purported Christian cronies for their own imperialist and economic motives.

This leads to another interesting point: the establishing of "one god" over and above any and all other gods, is an act of violence no matter how you look at it. In the Curse of Cain , Regina Schwartz writes about the relationship between Monotheism and Violence, positing that Monotheism itself is the root of violence :

Collective identity, which is the result of a covenant of Monotheism, is explicitly narrated in the Bible as an invention, a radical break with Nature . A transcendent deity breaks into history with the demand that the people he constitutes obey the law he institutes, and first and foremost among those laws is, of course, that they pledge allegiance to him, and him alone , and that this is what makes them a unified people as opposed to the 'other', as in all other people , which leads to violence. In the Old Testament, vast numbers of 'other' people are obliterated, while in the New Testament, vast numbers are colonized and converted for the sake of such covenants.[252]

Schwartz also writes about the idea of the "provisional" nature of a covenant: that it is conditional. "Believe in me and obey me or else I will destroy you." Doesn't sound like there is any choice, does there? And we find ourselves in the face of a pure and simple Nazi Theophany.[...][pgs.353-354].

[...]Sargon's story sounds a lot like a combination of the Biblical stories of Moses, David and Solomon and certainly, there is evidence of infusion of Semitic traditions into the culture of the Sumerians. We also wish to consider the the[sic] fact that Sargon was the first "semite". Nowadays "Semitic peoples" are generally understood to be, more or less, individuals of Middle Eastern origins: Jews and Arabs predominantly. That is to say, to be an Arab of a Jew is to be "Semitic".

In recent years the idea has taken hold that the Ashkenazi Jews are really Turkish and not Jews at all. Recent genetic studies place the Ashkenazi as closest in kinship to Roman Jews on one side, who are just a small step away from Lebanese non-Jews, and Syrian non-Jews on the other side. The Syrian non-Jews are very close to the Kurdish Jews and the Palestinian non-Jews--i.e. the "Palestinians".

What actually seems to have happened is that when the Khazar kingdom "converted" to Judaism, they invited Jewish rabbis to come and teach them how to be proper Jews. These rabbis, being "proper Jews", took Khazar wives, mixing with the Khazar population in this way. Additionally, after the fall ofthe Khazar kingdom, Yiddish-speaking "Jewish" immigrants from the west (especially Germany, Bohemia, and other areas of Central Europe)--which would include Roman Jewish lines--began to flood into Eastern Europe, and it is believed that these newer immigrants intermarried with the Khazars. Thus, Eastern European Jews have a mix of ancestors who came from Central Euorpeand from the Khazar kingdom. The two groups (eastern and western Jews) intermarried over the centuries.

In this sense, the Ashkenazi Jews are, indeed, descendants of the Israelites through the male line.[352][pg. 477]

A very ancient temple in the environs of Jerusalem is known to have been built by the Hyksos[314], but it was never a temple of Yahweh until extremely late, if it was ever a temple of Yahweh at all. It may very well be that the first temple of Yahweh was actually the one built by the small number of individuals who were sent to Palestine from Babylonian 'captivity' by Cyrus. The archaeological record shows that no more than 25%of the population was actually deported, and when descendants of this select group were sent back to establish an outpost of the Persian empire to guard the trade routes, they resued to integrate with the people of the land--the descendants of the 75% of people that ha not been deported. That suggests strongly that the Yahweh cult had actually grown up and refined itself in Babylon and was not, actually, the religion of the ancient Hebrews resident in Palestine. However, even now it is uncertain what god was actually worshipped in the new temple