© REUTERS/Carlos Garcia RawlinsPeople get tested for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) at a mobile nucleic acid testing site outside a shopping mall in Beijing, China March 16, 2022.
The availability of effective COVID vaccines and treatments is crucial in laying the groundwork for China's potential pivoting from its "dynamic COVID zero" policy, which aims to eliminate every outbreak - however small - and relies on mass testing and strict quarantining.
The Azvudine tablet, which China approved in July last year to treat certain HIV-1 virus infections, has been given a conditional green light to treat adult patients with "normal type" COVID, the National Medical Products Administration said in a statement.
"Normal type" COVID is a term China uses to refer to coronavirus infections where there are signs of pneumonia, but the patients haven't reached a severe stage.
China in February allowed the use of Pfizer's oral treatment Paxlovid in adults with mild-to-moderate COVID and high risk of progressing to a severe condition. In 2020, it approved the use of Lianhuaqingwen capsules, a traditional Chinese medicine-style formula, to alleviate symptoms of COVID such as fever and cough.
Political Cartoons on World Leaders
In a late-stage clinical trial, 40.4% of patients taking Azvudine showed improvement in symptoms seven days after first taking the drug, compared with 10.9% in the control group, Henan province-based Genuine Biotech said in a statement earlier this month, without providing detailed readings.
Other Chinese companies developing potential oral COVID treatments include Shanghai Junshi Biosciences and Kintor Pharmaceutical.
*
I'm retired LAPD (1980-2000) and private investigator (1997-2018).
In 2008, I investigated claims against UC Berkeley Prof. Peter Duesberg who was alleged to have killed millions on South African men (ala Collins' "take him out" operations). After establishing the claims were false, I distilled the claims to this basic question: When, where, why, what, and who proved that HIV 1) attacks cells and 2) causes AIDS?
The NIH and CDC refused to answer. Instead, they referred me to several social marketing companies (Edelman & Air.org) that have no obligation to tell the truth. The NIH/CDC websites post disclaimers about the third party websites they refer you to.
At the time, exposing someone to HIV was a felony and some people are still serving life prison sentences. So I put together a team of doctors, scientists, and lawyers to compel gov’t witnesses - "infectious disease experts" - to testify about the things that the CDC and NIH refused to address.
As a result, my team won DOZENS of cases across the US - including the landmark case US v. Gutierrez (2015) that essentially ended felony HIV prosecutions across the US.
Our success occurred primarily by focusing on the testing technologies and our client’s medical records, which were based entirely on tests that don’t detect diseases (read the package inserts - they don't!). Like the HIV test, the Corona tests don’t detect a virus or “markers”. Get past the pseudoscientific gibberish and go straight to the LIMITATIONS. Anyone can read them - but you must read them carefully.
One of our witnesses was the patent holder of the PCR/HIV test. While PCR is a reliable technology, test manufacturers use the name "PCR" to lend undeserved credibility to their unreliable products. [Link]
THE TESTS ARE PUSHED TO MAKE HEALTHY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THEY COULD DIE IF NOT TREATED WITH "BLACK BOX DRUGS" THAT KILL. AND WHEN THEY DIE, THE PROVIDER LISTS THE CAUSE OF DEATH AS HIV, ZIKA, CORONA etc. TO GENERATE MORE FEAR, TESTING, AND UNNECESSARY TREATMENTS. [Link]
We also used electronic microscopy (EM) to confirm the presence of HIV. Despite PCR and other test results that claimed that millions of “viral particles” were coursing through every ML of their blood, EM showed no evidence of HIV. [Link]
You’ve heard nothing about our cases because the pharmaceutical industry - the makers of these tests and drugs - represent 70% of all media advertising. If 60 Minutes reported our cases, 70% of their advertising revenues would evaporate.
Fauci controls $6 billion for "research funding", so if a researcher presents tough questions the NIH or CDC, he or she risks the loss of millions of dollars to their departments and university systems that enforce silence and retaliation against intellectually curious scientists and doctors.
Until the CDC and NIH are defunded and the corrupt, complicit, and acquiescent technocrats fired, this 40-year gov't-sponsored genocide will continue in the US and around the world.
From Uncovering the Corona Narrative Ernst Wolffs' answer to the big questions that have plagued all of us. Robert W Malone MD, MS Mar 25 [Link]