© Alex Chan Tsz Yuk/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty ImagesA Ukrainian soldier demonstrates a weapon provided by the UK in April 2022.
It is "completely legitimate" for Ukraine to attack Russian territory, a British defence minister has said, as Russia accused the NATO military alliance of waging a proxy war.
James Heappey, the UK armed forces minister,
told Times Radio on Tuesday that Ukraine was justified in seeking to disrupt Russian supplies.
"In war, Ukraine needs to strike into its opponents' depth to attack its logistics lines, its fuel supplies, its ammunition depots, and that's part of it," he said.
"It is completely legitimate for Ukraine to be targeting in Russia's depth in order to disrupt the logistics, that if they weren't disrupted would directly contribute to death and carnage on Ukrainian soil."Heappey acknowledged the weapons provided by the West to Ukraine "have the range to be used over the borders" in Russia, but stressed:
"That is not necessarily a problem."He added: "Ukraine is targeting what I would say are completely legitimate targets to disrupt Russian logistics supplies, and they make those choices just as the Russians make choices to indiscriminately bomb Ukrainian towns and cities."The UK has donated a range of lethal aid to Ukraine over the two months since the conflict began, including armoured vehicles, drones and anti-tank weapons.
Ben Wallace, the UK defence secretary, confirmed Monday that Britain would be "gifting" a number of armored vehicles fitted with anti-air missile launchers. Ukrainian soldiers have also been receiving training in the UK on how to use 120 armoured vehicles that will be supplied to the resistance effort against Russia.
Heappey's comments come as Russia's foreign minister accused NATO of fighting a proxy war by supplying military aid to Ukraine. Putin's regime has long cited what it called NATO's eastward expansion as one of its justifications for invading Ukraine."NATO, in essence, is engaged in a war with Russia through a proxy and is arming that proxy. War means war," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told Russian state media on Monday.Lavrov also claimed the risks of nuclear conflict were now "considerable," saying there was a "serious, real" risk of entering a third world war.But Heappey rubbished this, telling BBC Radio 4's Today programme the chances of nuclear warfare were "vanishingly small."Speaking to Sky News, the minister added:
"All of this noise from Moscow about somehow their attack on Ukraine being a response to NATO aggression is just utter, utter nonsense."NATO and the West would continue to "avoid being actively involved so it doesn't escalate and become a European war," Heappey told Times Radio. However as an independent country, Ukraine has "a sovereign right to have whoever it wishes into its country," he said.
His intervention comes as more than 40 countries and the NATO secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, meet in Germany on Tuesday to discuss how to increase security assistance to Kyiv.
Comment: Of course the NATO is going to discount the legitimate reason for Russia's actions as "nonsense," and scoff at their warnings of possible escalations, even nuclear strikes. But Russia certainly doesn't see it that way. More
from RT:
The Russian Ministry of Defense has accused London of a "direct provocation" after British Armed Forces Minister James Heappey encouraged Ukrainian forces to use UK-supplied weapons to attack targets inside Russia. Any attempts to do so would invoke an immediate response, the ministry warned in a statement on Tuesday.
"We want to emphasize that London's direct provocation of the Kiev regime to such actions, should they attempt to do so, will immediately lead to our proportional response. As we have warned, the Russian armed forces are on standby around the clock to retaliate with long-range high-precision weapons against decision-making centers in Kiev," the military warned.
The ministry went on to say that "advisers from one of the Western nations" located in these centers "won't necessarily be a problem" in Russia's decision-making regarding retaliatory measures.
...
The UK has been among the top arms suppliers of Kiev, pouring thousands of anti-tank missiles into the country ahead of the large-scale Russian military operation that kicked off in late February. Prime Minister Boris Johnson recently announced an additional ยฃ100 million ($130 million) package of heavy weaponry for Kiev, which includes anti-aircraft weapons, drones, and various armored vehicles.
Moscow has warned the West against ramping up weapon supplies, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stating that the conflict has effectively turned into a "proxy war" waged by NATO against Russia. The country's military has repeatedly targeted depots where these supplies are amassed and will continue doing so, he said.
"These weapons will be a legitimate target for the Russian Armed Forces," Lavrov stated. "Warehouses, including in the west of Ukraine, have become such a target more than once. How else? NATO is essentially going to war with Russia through a proxy and arming that proxy. War means war."
Comment: Of course the NATO is going to discount the legitimate reason for Russia's actions as "nonsense," and scoff at their warnings of possible escalations, even nuclear strikes. But Russia certainly doesn't see it that way. More from RT: