© USN PO1C Dominique A. Pineiro / ReutersGen. Joe Dunford (left) and Gen. Valery Gerasimov (right), Helsinki, Finland, June 8, 2018
Major international media have reported that Russia's Armed Forces' Chief of General Staff, Valery Gerasimov has contacted his US counterpart Joseph Dunford with a proposal.
According to reports citing a US government memo, the Russian military has supposedly offered the US military to cooperate in rebuilding the devastated Syrian nation.
If the memo and reports are true, then Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, contacted United States General Joseph Dunford, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on July 19, offering Russian cooperation in the reconstruction of Syria and in the repatriation of refugees to the Arab country.
This is the first time such a proposal has been reported, but details have not yet been released.
"The proposal argues that the Syrian regime lacks the equipment, fuel, other materials and funds needed to rebuild the country to accept refugee returns," the memo reads.
"The United States will only support returning refugees
when the situation is safe, return is voluntary and dignified," the memo also contains, stipulating that the US would only cooperate
in the event of the end of the Syrian war and once Syrian elections are held and supervised by the UN.
General Dunford's office, however,
declined to comment on communications with his Russian counterpart.
"In accordance with past practice, both Generals have agreed to keep the details of their conversations private," the American general's spokeswoman told reporters.
The Russian Ministry of Defense has declined to comment on the memorandum.The US and Russian armed forces have maintained a private communications channel to prevent unwanted military collisions in Syria. However, this latest report shows that
the channel might also be used to discuss issues that are not strictly military in nature.
Interestingly enough, the alleged memo emphasizes: "Russian diplomats and other officials have also been engaging in an aggressive campaign to describe the initiative in other capitals and to insinuate that it is an outcome of the U.S.-Russia meeting in Helsinki,
which it is not, repeat not."
This rather strange commentary seems to suggest that US-Russia cooperation in Syria should not be seen as the result of diplomacy between the two countries' leaders, especially their historic Helsinki summit, which instantly casts a familiar partisan shade over this alleged memorandum.
Indeed, since the US-Russia summit in Finland, Trump has been relentlessly attacked by his opponents who allege that the US President should have de-legitimized his own authority by pressing Putin on alleged Russian interference in the US elections. The Democrats are also frustrated that they do not know what the two presidents discussed in particular behind closed doors.
The Democrats, deep state, and much of the US establishment as a whole have routinely discouraged and, in the phrasing of some, "criminalized" diplomacy in their attempts to undermine Trump's reform of the declining Atlanticist project. FRN has repeatedly suggested that "Russiagate" news be treated in this context.
Comment: While unconfirmed, the terms of the memo are plausible and reflect the Russian approach to diplomacy. While they have every opportunity to throw the U.S. to the wolves by exposing U.S. collusion with radical jihadists, the Russian approach is to always leave the door open for cooperation, to let bygones be bygones, even to let the U.S. participate in the benefits (material and in terms of public image) of victory. But the U.S. is stubborn, as the memo also suggests: they will only cooperate once every last chance of subversion is gone, i.e., when the war is 'over'. But the war will only be over once the U.S. stops supporting 'opposition' in the form of jihadists and the Kurds. But even then, Russia will probably keep this offer on the table, because peace is the best outcome, even if one must swallow their pride to make it happen.
Update: The Russian MoD has now
commented, blaming Washington for the leak:
The Russian offer, passed on through a confidential communication channel between the militaries of the two nations, was initially reported by Reuters on Sunday after the agency obtained a US government memo about it.
The Russian Ministry of Defense has now confirmed that a proposal to join efforts in Syria was sent by the chief of the Russian General Staff, General Valery Gerasimov, to the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Marine General Joseph Dunford, in mid-July.
Regarding the leak, Moscow said "the inability of the US side to comply with the agreement on publicizing the contacts [between the two militaries] only with the consent of both sides is disappointing."
"We expect that the US side will be able to take the necessary measures to prevent further violations of mutual agreements in the future."
The Russian MoD also expanded on the content of its offer. Moscow is open "to work with the Syrian authorities on providing security guarantees to the refugees from the Rukban camp in the US-controlled area of al-Tanf and creating necessary conditions for their return home."
The defense ministry also said it is prepared to "coordinate the issues of humanitarian demining, including in Raqqa," as well as addressing other humanitarian issues. The joint work would serve to establish a return to peaceful life in Syria as well as curbing attempts by terrorists to find recruits.
Moscow again underlined the importance of the secure communication channel with Washington on Syria, saying that it "helps [in] preventing incidents between our armed forces and finding mutually acceptable solutions [to pressing issues], taking into account the interests of both countries."
The Russian proposal "received an icy reception in Washington," Reuters reported.
Comment: While unconfirmed, the terms of the memo are plausible and reflect the Russian approach to diplomacy. While they have every opportunity to throw the U.S. to the wolves by exposing U.S. collusion with radical jihadists, the Russian approach is to always leave the door open for cooperation, to let bygones be bygones, even to let the U.S. participate in the benefits (material and in terms of public image) of victory. But the U.S. is stubborn, as the memo also suggests: they will only cooperate once every last chance of subversion is gone, i.e., when the war is 'over'. But the war will only be over once the U.S. stops supporting 'opposition' in the form of jihadists and the Kurds. But even then, Russia will probably keep this offer on the table, because peace is the best outcome, even if one must swallow their pride to make it happen.
Update: The Russian MoD has now commented, blaming Washington for the leak: