OF THE
TIMES
New war? Is that because it is losing its current war and wants a new one โ hoping desperately that doing the same thing over and over again will...
Not that we needed further confirmation of just how duplicitous the US really is, or how little it can be trusted in any deal or agreement.
Socialism fails because it isn't real socialism in the first place โ it is either communism, in the old Soviet style, or a botched attempt at...
On a related note, and as I said already : [Link] The US is cutting support for NATO due to fears of a military clash with Russia The US lost a...
Well, kids, you see, anybody can be an academic professor these days. Just follow your greatest fantasies and sell them as word salad.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Comment: Trump a week ago:
But fear not - a war with Iran remains unlikely at this point. Such a move would be too costly and risky for the US and the global economy, and surely even the warhawks in the Deep State understand this.
Notice that Trump sweetened his tone after that tweet, so it appears he was both distracting the attention from the unfairly bad press he received for meeting Putin, and was once again applying his 'shock-and-awe' negotiating style.