OF THE
TIMES
It is, just like bird flu, another BS blown out proportion with the aim to bankrupt ranchers. It is by design, first there was a string of fake...
The UK is going through so much sh!t, it makes me wonder when the folks are actually going to push back en-masse. Not some random protests and...
What was it like out here when the soil could still sequester carbon? (Insert eye-roll here). Counterpunch perpetually panders to...
Egypt are being paid very handsomely to turn a blind eye
Never ever, carry "Tater Tots" in a pocket in your cargo pants...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Reader Comments
R.C.
Actually, they even admit it in this article, so I don't understand why do they plan to do it?
However I approve, because as always - more money wasted on it will mean less money for killing stuff.
Now if they had said, a rocket motor would be mounted on an asteroid, or they were building a space tug to move the asteroid,( no nukes required), it would then be credible.
lies, damned lies and Never a straight answer,( NASA).
What's interesting from the scientific point is the sample return mission (OSIRIS-REx), which is supposed to return to Earth in a couple of years (2023). They got the dates wrong on Sputnik - this won't be this year. Also the planetoid has a chance of striking Earth in 2135, not in 2035, so it's not an immediate danger.