OF THE
TIMES
" Comment: Encouraging news, but it could be a feint. The same regulations on censorship and centralization of power could still be brought in...
At the end of the day - may the best ideas prevail. The chips are on the table. Place your bets!
Excellent SOTT comment.
Quote: "You gotta include the media, think tanks, and academia in this โ in addition to the military-industrial complex and the political class....
Cynthia Chung is one of the best journalist/historians at revealing the dark underbelly of USA created wars to subjugate countries, murder the...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
R.C.
Actually, they even admit it in this article, so I don't understand why do they plan to do it?
However I approve, because as always - more money wasted on it will mean less money for killing stuff.
Now if they had said, a rocket motor would be mounted on an asteroid, or they were building a space tug to move the asteroid,( no nukes required), it would then be credible.
lies, damned lies and Never a straight answer,( NASA).
What's interesting from the scientific point is the sample return mission (OSIRIS-REx), which is supposed to return to Earth in a couple of years (2023). They got the dates wrong on Sputnik - this won't be this year. Also the planetoid has a chance of striking Earth in 2135, not in 2035, so it's not an immediate danger.