OF THE
TIMES
I, too, remember those days in 1989. And, yes, we all believed that there would be world peace and prosperity. We were wrong.
"if Washington crosses the next threshold, Tehran would pivot instantly from nuclear ambiguity to undeniable demonstration." Does the US...
"What has kept them from arriving at the truth is that the U.S. government has continued to stand by Israel instead of the servicemen who were...
"Russia is Armenia's largest trading partner and supplies more than 80% of the country's natural gas and around 60% of its oil." They'll find...
To date, No one has tried to move a massive stone like that on ice. Hmmmm
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

Reader Comments
R.C.
Actually, they even admit it in this article, so I don't understand why do they plan to do it?
However I approve, because as always - more money wasted on it will mean less money for killing stuff.
Now if they had said, a rocket motor would be mounted on an asteroid, or they were building a space tug to move the asteroid,( no nukes required), it would then be credible.
lies, damned lies and Never a straight answer,( NASA).
What's interesting from the scientific point is the sample return mission (OSIRIS-REx), which is supposed to return to Earth in a couple of years (2023). They got the dates wrong on Sputnik - this won't be this year. Also the planetoid has a chance of striking Earth in 2135, not in 2035, so it's not an immediate danger.