© Peter Nicholls / Reuters
Comment: One has to think that economic shock might be necessary if the alternative is to continue to take away programs that benefit the average person in the UK. Austerity certainly protects the rich, and that's why you see the politicians and their offices continue to support a policy of austerity.
The watchdog argues that if Brexit leads to a recession and higher inflation, or a drop in migration, then the amount the government has to borrow could soar.
This view chimes with the position of Chancellor Philip Hammond, who has proven resistant to the idea of ending the seven-year program of austerity.
The OBR said any of the possible negative outcomes of Brexit could force the government to re-impose harsh cuts, raise taxes or, in the worst case, default.
"The essential thing here is to have the debt-to-GDP ratio on a declining path during good times to build up insurance space that you can exploit when the bad times hit," Sir Charlie Bean, a director at the OBR, told the Times newspaper.Chair of the OBR Robert Chote said one only had to look around the world "to see the consequences of those sorts of things."
"When you start with a relatively high debt to GDP ratio it's relatively more important to build that space in than if you start with a relatively low position.
"This is the sort of time when you would hope that you would be starting to create fiscal space for there will be some bad surprises that come along. We don't necessarily know what they will be, but you should sure as hell prepare for bad news at some point."
Hammond, one of the architects of austerity, told the paper that the OBR's analysis was fair.
"This is a sober analysis of the challenge we continue to face, and a stark reminder of why we must deliver on our commitment to deal with our country's debts," he said.
Reader Comments
to our Newsletter