Image
The European Union "only facilitated the conflict in Ukraine" when it announced that "the Association Agreement is incompatible with the Customs Union agreement between Kiev and Moscow", said former Chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schroeder in an interview with the radio station Europe-1.

Schroeder also criticized NATO, as "this alliance does not have a political purpose, and its actions do not help to build trust, but on the contrary, create more and more concerns". Measures to solve the Ukrainian crisis "should be solely diplomatic", he stressed.

Schroeder spoke against attempts to isolate Russia, particularly by rejecting to attend the G8 summit in Sochi. "In such critical conditions, any measures that block further discussions are wrong," Schroeder noted.

When asked about whether Germany could take a tougher position on the issue, he emphasized that "boycotts should be used in a way that does not harm your own interests."

As G8 countries announced they had suspended praparations for the group's summit slated to take place in the Russian city of Sochi in June, Martin Sieff, American columnist with the Post Examiner newspaper, told in an interview to the Voice of Russia, why, in his opinion, the move is "a very bad mistake" and how US and Europe contradict their basic principles.

What do you think about Russia and the G8 summit in Sochi? Is it possible that Russia will be out of that?

I think there is a very real possibility of that. I think it would be a very bad mistake. I think it is crucially important for not just Russia but the US and the other G8 members to maintain full dialogue and communications now, it is more important than ever. But I think the attitude in Washington towards events in Ukraine and Crimea are galloping at such a speed and the lack of real dialogue between Washington and Moscow is now so serious that the survival of G8 and Sochi is very much in doubt.

If the US is siding with the people who have seated the power in Ukraine with the help of extremists, doesn't that mean that they are supporting radicalism?

Yes, this is exactly what it means and this is the great contradiction in the American and European position. If this kind of events of violent revolution like this was happening in any western European nation, or ally of the US anywhere in the world or around the western hemisphere, the US reaction and the European reactions would certainly be to support the central government as strongly as possible because Ukraine was not a dictatorship. President Yanukovich was democratically elected, he was still in his first term, he had lost the previous election, previously the Ukrainian presidents were defeated, have stood down, Ukraine had freedom of the press, was peaceful, had independent political parties, Ukraine was free and democratic. There was no justification for a violent toppling of the government.

What can be done right now to eradicate extremism in Ukraine?

The best course of action would be for the US not to demonize Russia but to open up negotiations with Russia about stabilizing Ukraine. Ukraine is deeply divided because of the irresponsibility mainly of European Union policies and also to a significant degree of US policies. What is crucially important is first of all to try and get western aid to keep the economy afloat and secondly to develop a constructive dialogue and participation so that there is a true coalition government for the moment in Kiev because right now it is crucially important that eastern Ukraine and western Ukraine work together well enough to prevent disintegration.