75% of physicians in the world refuse chemotherapy for themselves

WorldTruth.tv
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:37 UTC

Doctors used to think that if they drained a sick person's blood it would purge the "evil" infection or disease right out of the body, but all that did was make the ill person much weaker, unable to fight off whatever was invading their body, and the patient was then highly likely to lose the battle for life, and in less time.

Research using polls and questionnaires continue to show that 3 of every 4 doctors and scientists would refuse chemotherapy for themselves due to its devastating effects on the entire body and the immune system, and because of its extremely low success rate. On top of that, only 2 to 4% of all cancers even respond to chemotherapy or prove to be "life extending," yet it is prescribed across the board for just about every kind of cancer.

Polls were taken by accomplished scientists at the McGill Cancer Center from 118 doctors who are all experts on cancer. They asked the doctors to imagine they had cancer and to choose from six different "experimental" therapies. These doctors not only denied chemo choices, but they said they wouldn't allow their family members to go through the process either! What does that say about their true opinion of this archaic method?

These surveys are having a profound effect on the general public opinion of chemo treatments in most of Western society, especially the United States, which uses more than any nation in the world. This lack of trust by doctors is spilling over to patients, and the move towards natural remedies is increasing, much the way it did in the early 1900's, before the dawn of corrupt medicine, pharmaceuticals, and radiation.

An elevated level of toxicity is actually the last thing any human being needs when fighting infection, disease, or pneumonia.

Auto-immune disorders are mainly caused when humans ingest chemicals from food, drinking water, vaccines contaminated with chemicals, artificial sweeteners and environmental pollution. Chemotherapy, like the popular Cis-platinum, fills the body with horrific toxins, and doctors and scientists know it, but because the FDA outlaws doctors from suggesting or prescribing vitamins, supplements, herbs and super-foods, chemical therapy is still "recommended."

The way to beat cancer is to detoxify your body and build up your host immune system, not break it down further by dousing one tumor or one organ with chemicals that pollute the entire system. Put it this way, if an elderly person had an injured toe and it needed a cold compress to help heal it, would you submerge the senior in a freezing pool of water repeatedly for days, and then wait for the toe to heal? Doctors know how absurd the ideology of chemotherapy really is, but when a society bases the bulk of its therapy on chronic care management, the doctors are silently coerced into suggesting it or finding another profession.

Chemotherapy shows very little success with common solid tumors that occur in the colon, lung and breasts, as documented over the past decade, yet somehow doctors still push "chemo" to attempt to stave off tumors and malignant growths in these areas of the body.

Could it be some extreme coincidence that although 75% of doctors would refuse chemotherapy for themselves and their family members, they still prescribe it for 75% of their patients? The costly price of chemo and the likelihood of Big Pharma "kickbacks" is screaming the answer "no."

At best, chemotherapy should be considered alternative treatment, but for over 70 years Allopathic medicine has warped the public perception of true medicine, so if you happen to get cancer and your doctor tells you what to do, you may want to ask him/her if they would do the same thing for themselves and their family members.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.naturalnews.com/036054_chemotherapy_physicians_toxicity.html#ixzz1x8VNRjEa

http://www.scribd.com

http://www.globalhealingcenter.com

http://breastcancercover-up.com/

http://cancercentre.mcgill.ca/research/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2001350/

http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/2-physicians-refuse-chemo.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/opinion/economic-bleeding-cure.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/036054_chemotherapy_physicians_toxicity.html#ixzz1x8VUXDgS

Reader Comments

Yossarian · 2013-04-24T20:00:57Z

There's probably truth in this . .

but checking out the source links doesn't inspire a lot of confidence. They are only tangentially related and mostly unsourced themselves. Unfortunately, it is difficult to find unbiased and untainted data in this realm. Makes one think though.

Rabelais · 2014-03-10T04:01:24Z

All the verification one needs can be found at the cemetery.

BINGER · 2013-04-24T21:29:50Z

Check out other sources, Yossarian.

As there is plenty of evidence that chemotherapy nor radiation treatments work, but instead wreak havoc with the body, so much so, that the person after the treatments begin, stands little chance of recovering from the cancer using any alternative approaches.

As a side note, it might be wise to ask a doctor if he would take the pills he wants to prescribe for you. On the other hand, forget it. I have a retired pharmacist brother-in-law who has mentioned many times that most doctors are totally ignorant of the the drugs they push. They just do what Big Pharma tells them to do.

Olesya · 2013-04-25T03:37:02Z

@ Yossarian

In the McGill Cancer Center survey (1986) published under the name "Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment." [Link]and [Link] "81% of doctors refused to participate in the study of the five types of combination chemotherapy. Most of the doctors refused to participate because they did not want any form of chemotherapy in this situation.

Of those doctors who would not participate, 70% thought that chemotherapy would be ineffective and 60% thought that chemotherapy would be too toxic. 17% of doctors wanted radiation as additional treatment...
Of the 79 who responded, 64 said they would not consent to be in a drug trial that contained cisplatin; of the 64, 58 found ALL drug trials to be unacceptable. The reason: “the ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.”

This study involved only oncologists. I doubt that the results of the similar study, only with other types of doctors, would be comparable to this one. So, the more these doctors know about some particular cancer treatment, the less likely they would consent to it... and still they continue to recommend these toxic treatments to their patients.

In the same study it says: "It was concluded that the lay people were unable to discern differences in the acceptability of clinical trials which were clear to experts in the field. Subsequently, respondents were told about the decisions which doctors would make in the same circumstances and asked if this information would modify their previous decisions....the proportion of people consenting to the chemotherapy trial decreased by 40%. The majority of lay people said that they would wish to have access to this type of information before consenting to participate in a clinical trial."
How these doctors can sleep at night doing what their doing? I don't know.