OF THE
TIMES
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well... You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect...
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
Scientists tried to reinfect people with Covid but found it impossible Maybe because they never found it to begin with. his first brush with...
Ok Ok I'm taking a break after this. Promise 🤣 I am dizzying meself 🤦♀️ Dr. Wayne Dyer articulated it so precisely when he said, “The concept of...
He was just having some fun, after all, where he was imported from there's no trees and probably never got to play with a chainsaw before.
SOTT editors, Your Cradle link above the article takes us to a Daily Mail article about a man charging a cop with a chainsaw.
isc6822, a conversation with you LOL [Link]
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Or is this story just intended to stir things up and make us even more suspicious of the people who are supposed to be protecting us?
I realize that the FBI does not have that great a civil rights record, indicating some degree of criminal infiltration. But it's hard to believe that the whole agency has gone totally insane.
Could the agency, as a group, really be this stupid? I suppose some will answer "yes." If so, we'd be better off without an FBI. But you'd think an agency that has been dealing with criminals as long as the FBI has would learn a few actual truths about crime. Perhaps not.
I know commentators who are convinced the FBI has totally submerged below the level of sane action. If so, that's a real tragedy.