OF THE
TIMES
๐ช๐ช will work, besides pulling out the wires.
What's coming down the pipe to distract from with a home grown FF?
I had a similar experience in high school. I believe students, at least high school students should be segregated by gender. When all those...
Biggest supplier of misinformation are all the governments.
โWhenever the government of the United States shall break up, it will probably be in consequence of a false direction having been given to public...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
I get: 1918, 1929, 1940, 1951, 1962, 1973, 1984, 1995, 2006, 2017.
But the actual data is "about" 11 years.
When I look at the butterfly plot at Wikipedia I get this sequence:
1918, 1929, 1940, 1950, 1960, 1970, 1982, 1992, 2003, 2014 (about).
It's not a step-pattern on the butterfly graph, but a more gradual change.
The graph of sunspot counts is easier to read in this regard, but I couldn't find one covering the whole period. From an Australian site I get this series:
1917, 1928, 1937, 1947, 1957, 1968, 1979, 1989 .. 2001 ... 2013? extended using a PDF from another site (Columbia University).
This suggests the outbreaks may lag 1 or 2 years from the sunspot maxima.
However, the comet (or whatever) impacts may coincide more closely with the actual sunspot maxima. If so, we could get a nice little bombardment late this year - early next year, then see a disease outbreak about a year after that.