Comment: If you keep an eye on the steel column which is still standing, it appears to simply vaporise.
Then, you can visit this interesting site to read an explanation.
Secret History
Some of you may have seen this short clip. I believe it was Judy Wood who brought attention to it some years ago. In the context of recent posts discussing 'exotic' forces, I thought I'd throw it out there...
Then, you can visit this interesting site to read an explanation.
Then, you can visit this interesting site to read an explanation.
Reader Comments
Dissapearing Mountains
This begins to make a lot more sense now than before, and helps to explain how the steel was literally vaporised into dust and how such a cloud of vaporised dust could blanket the city so quickly after the Towers fell. One of the things that came to mind whilst reading the linked source was that this would also explain the disappearing mountain in North Korea, which, it has been suspected, was caused by a nuclear detonation. What if Kim was not only testing his own nuclear capability, but also sending a clear signal or sign to the world (which he hoped would be seen as such) about how a structure as large as a mountain could be vaporised/levelled by the same type of underground nuclear explosion used to vaporise the World Trade Centres. No wonder the US has been so vehemently stoking war between the two Koreas, they realise that Kim knows what they did, and how they did it. I may be clutching at straws, but it would be interesting if we could find any satellite or other data about that past explosion for comparison.
This begins to make a lot more sense now than before, and helps to explain how the steel was literally vaporised into dust and how such a cloud of vaporised dust could blanket the city so quickly after the Towers fell. One of the things that came to mind whilst reading the linked source was that this would also explain the disappearing mountain in North Korea, which, it has been suspected, was caused by a nuclear detonation. What if Kim was not only testing his own nuclear capability, but also sending a clear signal or sign to the world (which he hoped would be seen as such) about how a structure as large as a mountain could be vaporised/levelled by the same type of underground nuclear explosion used to vaporise the World Trade Centres. No wonder the US has been so vehemently stoking war between the two Koreas, they realise that Kim knows what they did, and how they did it. I may be clutching at straws, but it would be interesting if we could find any satellite or other data about that past explosion for comparison.
You don't need nukes to explain 911
IMHO, the nukes were (a) groping for an explanation and then (b) became misinformation. Then in spite of official stalling of permission to access to an electron scanning microscope, finally this research was completed:
[Link]
This goes back beyond April 2009, and pretty well conclusively proves the use of nano-thermite 'spray-painted' onto the beams. Remember also that the top floors were closed "for computer maintenance" a few weeks before 11 Sept!
And only the US and Israel are known to have this application of nano-technology.......
As far as I'm concerned, the book is closed as to the 'how' of 911........
IMHO, the nukes were (a) groping for an explanation and then (b) became misinformation. Then in spite of official stalling of permission to access to an electron scanning microscope, finally this research was completed:
[Link]
This goes back beyond April 2009, and pretty well conclusively proves the use of nano-thermite 'spray-painted' onto the beams. Remember also that the top floors were closed "for computer maintenance" a few weeks before 11 Sept!
And only the US and Israel are known to have this application of nano-technology.......
As far as I'm concerned, the book is closed as to the 'how' of 911........
Dustification not vaporization
Dr. Judy Wood recently published her book, Where Did The Towers Go?, in which she expertly deconstructs the official story as well as the popular thermitic / nuclear/ explosive demolition theories. Pointing to temperatures, seismic signatures, materials analysis, anomalous phenomena, etc, she presents compelling evidence of the use of directed free energy technology on 9/11.
The information is freely available on her extensive website, drjudywood.com. For those interested in a printed version of the information, her new 500 page hardcover book is filled with exceptionally clear multi-color charts, tables, and sharp photographs-- also available at her website.
You may notice that the mainstream 911 “Truth” movement tends to either black-out or mis-characterize her evidence. That should tell you something.
Dr. Judy Wood recently published her book, Where Did The Towers Go?, in which she expertly deconstructs the official story as well as the popular thermitic / nuclear/ explosive demolition theories. Pointing to temperatures, seismic signatures, materials analysis, anomalous phenomena, etc, she presents compelling evidence of the use of directed free energy technology on 9/11.
The information is freely available on her extensive website, drjudywood.com. For those interested in a printed version of the information, her new 500 page hardcover book is filled with exceptionally clear multi-color charts, tables, and sharp photographs-- also available at her website.
You may notice that the mainstream 911 “Truth” movement tends to either black-out or mis-characterize her evidence. That should tell you something.
Another alternative to the alternative theories: ACE (aetheric coronal elements). See www.educate-yourself.org for more info. Sounds plausible, especially since many of the vehicles parked on the streets in and around the WTC buildings mysteriously lost only their engines (especially the engine blocks). Apparently, ACE has an affinity for iron, the denser the better....
Re: Dustification not vaporization
I would have to agree with you concerning the way Dr. Wood's theories are treated. You can always tell if you are over the target by how much flak you're getting, the old saying goes.
In addition to the above video, there's the video that shows something strange taking place at the top of the old Woolworth building during the collapse of the towers. Very few researchers talk about it or even know about it, it seems. The damage to one of the spires of that building doesn't fit with any of the thermite, nukes and explosives based theories, but fits nicely with a weaponized version of the Hutchison Effect.
I would have to agree with you concerning the way Dr. Wood's theories are treated. You can always tell if you are over the target by how much flak you're getting, the old saying goes.
In addition to the above video, there's the video that shows something strange taking place at the top of the old Woolworth building during the collapse of the towers. Very few researchers talk about it or even know about it, it seems. The damage to one of the spires of that building doesn't fit with any of the thermite, nukes and explosives based theories, but fits nicely with a weaponized version of the Hutchison Effect.
There you go America!
If this can be done to your own people, imagine what they can do to others?
If this can be done to your own people, imagine what they can do to others?
The 9/11 Book... is open
To most thoughtful observers, it’s pretty clear what did *not* happen on 9/11/01 and perhaps we can close the book on that part.
But as for what *did* happen, we must continue to look to the evidence. And the most serious and comprehensive scientific forensic analysis of the evidence to date has been freely provided by Dr. Judy Wood on her extensive website: [Link]and in her book available for purchase at [Link]
As Andrew Johnson (http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/) pointed out at the time, even Laura has referenced, albeit without attribution, the work of Dr. Judy Wood in her 2007 blog entry: [Link]
To most thoughtful observers, it’s pretty clear what did *not* happen on 9/11/01 and perhaps we can close the book on that part.
But as for what *did* happen, we must continue to look to the evidence. And the most serious and comprehensive scientific forensic analysis of the evidence to date has been freely provided by Dr. Judy Wood on her extensive website: [Link]and in her book available for purchase at [Link]
As Andrew Johnson (http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/) pointed out at the time, even Laura has referenced, albeit without attribution, the work of Dr. Judy Wood in her 2007 blog entry: [Link]
The smoking gun, er spires of the inside job!