Best of the Web:

9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST

physicsandreason
YouTube
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:50 UTC

Does US federal technology agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), think Newton's laws are only suggestions?

Reader Comments

Guillaume · 2010-07-25T03:25:21Z

Not good Material

I stopped watching after a minute or two. The voice is annoying and he moves through his material too quickly for a normal to comprehend. He speaks a little like a T.V. evangelist which is also a turn off.

Divide By Zero · 2010-07-25T22:19:41Z

No, This guy sounded like a science teacher

An evangelist states with emotion his ideas, even when he does not have data to back it up. This video sounded like a lecture on why the official report does not match up with the idea of a pancake collapse.

Another thing he should have mentioned is that when something falls onto something else, it is not always even and perfect. So, IF it was a pancake collapse, the forces on one side may be more than the other side, which would cause the top to tumble off, much like the popular game Jenga. However, these buildings fell perfectly straight. Not to mention WTC 7 which clearly looks like a controlled demolition.

Cymro · 2010-07-25T07:18:40Z

Nicely made video

An easy to follow video which backs up what I have been saying about the braces being popped. The bracing on any structure wouldn't allow free fall.

Johnny Yuma · 2010-07-25T13:16:28Z

Read the dispatch first!

I have noted a strange and inexplicable phenomenon associated with certain information. In the above posting Guillaume states he stopped watching the video because of narrators voice. I have heard this very statement a number of times when I have presented the material from the website [Link]One individual said, “he’s talking down to me, I won’t tolerate anyone talking down to me.” I was flabbergasted; this individual had decided the narrator had taken a personal dislike to him! The phenomenon has a predictable pattern in that the person virtually always feels that some sort of personal affront being directed towards them, i.e., “He speaks a little like a T.V. evangelist which is also a turn off.” The video is always turned off after a very short time and long before any case can be made and the information is always dismissed out of hand based on the perception of a personal affront to the listener. I have yet to hear something like the following, “the narrator was a complete jerk and I couldn’t stand listening to his voice, as for his outrageous idea that . . .” In these cases the listener never gets to the idea as they never get past what they think is a personal insult. Perhaps the most interesting thing about this phenomenon is that I find this response is only triggered by information considered controversial and having some sort of negative impact on Jews or the state of Isreal. I have encountered this too often for it to be mere happenstance. I can only wonder what has been programmed into society that triggers such a response. No doubt, this must happen with neutral information as well but I have yet to hear any such response to any other topic. In the past I have heard that a narrator is boring or a bad speaker, but until recently I had never encountered the idea of the listener being personally affronted. Of course, I have listened to narrators that I did not care for, but I still listened to what they had to say. I would urge that anyone having such a response to examine their own motivation as to why they feel as they do about such information. Perhaps the best approach towards such feelings is found in the old saying “Don’t shoot the messenger.” An even more appropriate thought would be, “don’t burn the messenger’s dispatch until you have read all of it.”

Woodsman · 2010-07-25T13:58:48Z

Good video.

This researcher got into the physics behind the story, which are not immediately easy to comprehend, but he took the effort to explain each logical step and provide demonstrations. It felt like a class room science video.

I confess, I had to stop to recall my high school science and then look up some details about the WTC building structure to see if the ideas presented were relevant, but in the end, I have find I have an improved and more grounded understanding of the forces involved.

If you find yourself put off by this video, it may be because it isn't pandering the way TV has taught us to believe we deserve; this isn't about explaining simple and easily digestible abstracts. This video took me a little extra effort to think my way through, and that can be offensive to the lazy predator lurking inside us all.

neodsa · 2010-07-25T18:44:46Z

Good video

There have been a few videos about the free fall of the towers , this one explained it in a slightly different way. O.K. I had to watch it through more than once to take it in but it was worth it.
How long can the PTB just keep ignoring these glaring truths ?

Zionism being a facist and racist practice is never going to be democratic. Ever.

Awordinyourear

Your private pension has been weakened however most companies invest in pensions and furthermore have the right to count them as company assets,...

Awordinyourear

This is quite obviously a PM that has no idea of where the 'delete' button is on his social-media platform. What a big-girl's blouse of a PM. I...

hotrod31

Correction. Turn off the ear worms.

Awordinyourear

Totally agree about the guitar SBC, rock on. Sometimes even musicians require total quiet. To have the ability to quiet the mind and use it at the...

Awordinyourear

Best of the Web:

9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk