Date sent: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:42:19 +0300
Hi, Arkadiusz!
I do not think, that the example resulted by you on the unification of even and odd numbers is similar to the unification of the quantum theory and the general theory of relativity. All is much more complex also a problem not in good mathematics, and in excellent physics. Now there is no lack of good mathematicians and physicists. Are now necessary ingenious physics of a level of Einstein. They are not present and it is the reason of crisis in physics.
As I see a situation in physics for today. The matter is that physics in the beginning of the last century have refused the direct description of a reality, having replaced the direct description indirect.Ark's reply will be published soon in our upcoming new "Science corner".
1. It began since that moment, when E. Rutherford has found out a deviation from the Coulomb law at scattering of the charged particles in strong (E, H =10^16V/s) electromagnetic fields. Physicists had enter "by hands" short-range additives to Coulomb potential. It is done till now the nuclear potentials are very complex and for their definition there are no reasonable equations.
2. Even more significant approach to the indirect description of a reality has arisen after creation of the quantum theory. Physics have ceased to understand physics and in general have refused figurative thinking. In physics there were unsoluble paradoxes and attempts of them to understand have led to split of leading scientists on two groups led by Einstein and Bohr.
3. The numerous models suggested for the description of elementary particles based on laws of conservation of energy-momentum , mass, charge, spin, etc. In some experiments these laws were broken. In this case new elements of the theory and new concepts were entered (for example, neutrino), restored the broken laws of conservation. It is one of elements of the indirect description, widely widespread in physics of a microcosm.
Usually search of generalization by this or that physical theories stimulate experiments which cannot bedescribed within the framework of the existing theory. It is possible to specify enough of such experiments in modern physics. And speech here goes not only about experiences in elementary particles spent on accelerators, or the phenomena observable in depths of cosmos with the help of modern telescopes. The question is about experiments which have been carried out in laboratory conditions also are known to experts.
I shall list only some (from the big number):
1. Mechanical experiments of Tolchin-Torson-Shipov on the creation of the inertial propulsion, showing " jet movement without rejection of mass".
2. Experiments Tesla-Avramenco on wireless and single-wire transfer of the electric power.
3. Experiments of the Ampere - Nicolaev on longitudinal electromagnetic fields
4. Classical experiments of the Aharonov-Bohm-Nicolaev.
5. Electrotorsional experiments Akimov-Chatchison
Though these and many other "abnormal" phenomena is good enough are known, the scientific beau monde prefers to ignore them and supersedes these experiences from a field of a science. Therefore sources of "free energy" are created not by scientists, but watch-makers (Paul Bauman, Switzerland) and musicians (Kochei Minato, Japan).
That is why are now necessary physics of a level of Einstein.
by what right a polish scientist who is interested in truth,is irradiated with extremely- low frequencies by german "colleagues"(probably they did even more on him).That is clearly a human Experiment("biophysical experiments") and therefore an evil and serious criminal offense and violates human dignity.
They did not let him know what they did with him so it was obviously without his consent.
This human experiments happened in Max-Planck Institute in Göttingen(germany)
There is a Homepage of this dubious Max-Planck Institute for "Biophysical Chemistry" [Link]