The Internet of Bodies ecosystem may lead to the Internet of Brains sometime between 2035 and 2050, according to a UK Defence-commissioned RAND report.
Commissioned by the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory and conducted by RAND Europe and Frazer Nash Consulting, the study "Cultural and technological change in the future information environment" looks at six technologies and information environments and their implications for British defense."An 'internet of bodies' may also ultimately lead to an 'internet of brains', i.e. human brains connected to the internet to facilitate direct brain-to-brain communication and enable access to online data networks"
RAND Corporation, March 2024
They include:
- Automated information systems
- A virtual metaverse
- Augmented and mixed reality
- Advanced connectivity
- Human augmentation
- Information security
According to the report, "Advances in object connectivity may eventually extend to human bodies. Researchers refer to the potential development of an internet-linked network of human-connected devices collecting end users' biometric data as an 'internet of bodies [...] An 'internet of bodies' may also ultimately lead to an 'internet of brains', i.e. human brains connected to the internet to facilitate direct brain-to-brain communication and enable access to online data networks.'""While some experts predict the tactical improvement of human capabilities, others have explored the potential emergence of 'trans-humanism' within the 2050 timeframe"
RAND Corporation, March 2024
The Internet of Bodies and the coming Internet of Brains fall specifically under the category of "human augmentation technologies," which "refer to technologies that enhance human capabilities, either physically or cognitively."
According to the report, the technological applications most associated with human augmentation include:
- Wearable devices and implants for tracking and analyzing physiological and environmental data (e.g. biochips and implantable sensors). These technologies aim to achieve real-time continuous monitoring of physiological data to understand human health conditions and performance
- Sensory augmentation technologies such as hearing and retinal implants designed to improve or augment sensory activities, particularly vision and hearing. Smart prosthetics are a related category, including exoskeletons, i.e. whole-body robotic suits that enhance end users' physical capabilities and improve their mobility, strength, endurance and other abilities
- Brain-computer or brain-brain interfaces that establish direct communications between human brains and/or computer devices
Transhumanism may lead to superhuman abilities, but those abilities may be reserved for only a select chosen class while the rest of us programmable plebs could exist in a constant state of surveillance and control until we become irrelevant.
According to the report, "While some experts predict the tactical improvement of human capabilities, others have explored the potential emergence of 'trans-humanism' within the 2050 timeframe.
"This concept describes 'a new form of human (a trans-human) [...] where information and communication technologies and biomedicine will fundamentally improve the human condition and greatly enhance human intellectual, physical and psychological capacities."
For the chosen ones, they could receive human performance enhancement that would give them the ability to never tire, think smarter, move faster, jump higher, see farther, hear better, hit harder, live longer, adapt stronger, and calculate quicker than any other human being on the planet.
Meanwhile, the fourth industrial revolution is already merging our physical, biological, and digital identities in order to monitor, manipulate, and reprogram our behavior.
If and when humans become fully integrated with machines on a large scale, where will the technology end and the human begin?
The authors of the RAND report say that "Given the direct embedding of technology into human cognitive, physical and psychological functions, substantial levels of human augmentation may '[blur] the notions of identity and of what it means to be human', introducing new normative lenses on humanity and producing new stigma for those not seen as attaining those norms."
On an individual level, if you wish to remain a natural human and not become part of "Homo sapiens technologicus," you might not be able to compete in the workplace, and you might be rendered part of the useless class of human.
On an international level, countries, cultures, and communities that don't participate in the transhumanist experiment may find themselves easily conquered by those that do.
The report adds, "The social dynamics of human augmentation adoption may include disparities in access to relevant technologies, thus introducing new forms of digital exclusion whereby the economically disadvantaged cannot access the same enhancement level as other societal segments."
At the same time, natural humans who don't get chipped may have an advantage in that they may not be as easily manipulated and controlled by thoughts or memories that may not be entirely their own.
In other words, transhumanism may lead to super-human capabilities for some, and mind control for others.
Internet of Bodies Examples, RAND Corporation 2020"Advances in brain-computer interfaces may translate into developing brain-to-brain communication technologies, leading to entirely new modes of interpersonal communication"
RAND Corporation, March 2024
Manipulation and control are other areas of concern with human augmentation, the Internet of Bodies, and the Internet of Brains."Human augmentation could undermine end users' cognitive safety and influence their ability to assess the credibility of information they receive while using human augmentation technologies"
RAND Corporation, March 2024
False information, images, sounds, memories, and thoughts could one day be downloaded to these devices and uploaded to the human brain with devastating effect.
According to the report, "Sensing technologies (e.g. hearing implants), in particular, carry a risk of interference, whereby devices could be manipulated to provide erroneous information to the end user.
"Such manipulation of sensory inputs would substantially amplify current threats from artificially creating or manipulating visual and auditory information (e.g. images and videos).
"Therefore, human augmentation could undermine end users' cognitive safety and influence their ability to assess the credibility of information they receive while using human augmentation technologies."
The Pentagon, too has been investigating how to fundamentally alter what it means to be human, funding research into creating super humans that are smarter, faster, and stronger through human performance enhancement."Significant advancements are likely in human augmentation technologies in the 2035-2050 timeframe"
RAND Corporation, March 2024
Once technology gets in-and-under the skin to collect as much intimate data about you as possible, you are well on the way to transhumanism and the beginning of what could be the worst totalitarian surveillance regime in human history.
Worse than being serfs, those not able to keep up in this brave new transhumanistic world would be rendered irrelevant, redundant, useless — unnecessary even for manual labor.
After all the genetic editing and the technological manipulation stemming from the fourth industrial revolution, will we still be able to call ourselves human?
Humanity as we know it may split into an entirely new species, where those not genetically edited or technologically altered could never compete with those who were.
In a future where humans are no longer considered to be natural humans, what would that mean for human rights?
Reader Comments
..
This could possibly be an issue 25 years from now. In the meantime, the RAND corporation will hash out the implications. Got it.
This is 'scary stuff'.... while the woman in the videos may seem a bit 'weird', she Really knows her stuff... well worth the almost two hours between the two videos.
[Link]
" Let’s be very clear from outset of this unsolicited coaching session, countless folks are gonna get triggered by these revelations—BIG TIME!!! And, the more triggered they get, the more they need to read this as well as watch the video below. Not only does this video presentation do a swift and deep dive into the arcana of what is actually ongoing “Tissue Wireless Engineering”, it also sheds light on some of the more stealthy types of frequency attacks on the human bio-organism which can be easily undertaken the more an individual has unwittingly created their own slow-motion kill-box ."
separate links to the videos themselves:
[Link]
[Link]
Would you be interested in this approx. 12 minute video by a SoTT editor?
Is your DNA an EMF antenna?
There are hundreds and hundreds of studies showing that our wireless wonderland of EMF is not good for our health. But you might ask: Well, HOW? When we say "EMF", we're talking about many...Right at the start of her video she mentions the biofield is a result of DNA.. She also reached out in the past to a documentarian working on, "... bioweapons of mass murder and frequency weapons of mass control... using various chemtrail formulations to disseminate different types of atmospheric nanotech and allotropes of carbon such as graphene.". That's when I became familiar with her work.
And I tried to encourage their research. I agree she seems to know her stuff. But I also think a lot of puffery can get "ink" in technical journals -- they want you to think it's all figured out -- so I retain some doubt.
The trauma this woman experienced has left deep wounds so I won't fault her viewpoint and the frustration it fosters. We've all got experiences that we'd rather do without...