VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Today's data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and June 4, a total of 329,021 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 5,888 deaths โ an increase of 723 deaths over the previous week. There were 28,441 serious injury reports, up 3,082 compared with last week.
Among 12- to 17-year-olds, there were 59 reports of heart inflammation and 19 cases of blood clotting disorders.
Of the 5,888 deaths reported as of June 4, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 24 hours and 39% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
This week's data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
- 5,367 total adverse events, including 165 rated as serious and four reported deaths among 12 to 17-year-olds. The youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573), a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942) and one 17-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1199455).
- 773 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to17-year-olds with 98% of cases attributed to Pfizer's vaccine, 1.8% to Moderna and 0.5% (or four cases) to J&J.
- 59 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 58 attributed to Pfizer's COVID vaccine.
- 16 reports of blood clotting disorders, all attributed to Pfizer.
- 20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
- 51% of those who died were male, 45% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
- The average age of death was 74.5.
- As of June 4, 2,012 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 666 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
- Of the 3,211 cases of Bell's Palsy reported, 53% were reported after Pfizer vaccinations, 42% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 253 cases, or 8%, of Bell's Palsy cases were reported in conjunction with J&J.
- 310 reports of Guillain-Barrรฉ Syndrome with 45% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 41% to Moderna and 21% to J&J.
- 92,929 reports of anaphylaxis with 41% of cases attributed to Pfizer's vaccine, 50% to Moderna and 9% to J&J.
- 5,907 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 2,482 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 2,017 reports to Moderna and 1,367 reports to J&J.
As The Defender reported today, the CDC on Thursday announced plans to convene an emergency meeting of its advisers on June 18 to discuss higher-than-expected reports of heart inflammation following doses of Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines.
As The Defender reported Thursday, before the announcement, the CDC on June 1 had quietly updated its website to acknowledge a higher-than-expected number of cases of myocarditis among young teens after the second dose of an mRNA COVID vaccine.
Based on a May 24 report from the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group, the CDC on June 1 added new language to its guidance:
"Data from VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System] show that in the 30-day window following dose 2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, there was a higher number of observed than expected myocarditis/pericarditis cases in 16-24-year-olds."
The updated language differed significantly from the CDC's statement two weeks earlier, which said rates of myocarditis were not higher among vaccinated people.
During a Thursday meeting of advisors to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, CDC officials presented data showing a total of 475 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were recorded in patients 30 and younger following mRNA vaccines.
The CDC identified 226 reports that might meet the agency's "working case definition" of myocarditis. The majority of those affected have recovered, but 41 had ongoing symptoms, 15 are still hospitalized and three are in the intensive care unit.
On June 10, The Defender reported the Oregon Health Authority said it was aware of at least 11 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis โ inflammation of the sac surrounding the heart โ in all age groups following COVID vaccination.One of the cases is a 15-year-old teen in Beaverton, Oregon, who was hospitalized for heart inflammation after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.
"The hallmark symptom of myocarditis and pericarditis is chest pain or shortness of breath," Jonathan Modie, an Oregon Health Authority spokesperson, said in an email. "In rare cases, it can also present in the form of heart palpitations. Anyone suffering from unexplained chest pain should contact a medical provider or seek immediate emergency care."
A search of the latest available data in VAERS revealed 900 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, among all age groups reported in the U.S following COVID vaccination between Dec.14, 2020 and June 4, 2021. Of the 900 cases reported, 533 cases were attributed to Pfizer, 331 cases to Moderna and 32 cases to J&J's COVID vaccine.
Experts tell FDA for kids, benefits of COVID vaccines don't outweigh the risks
As The Defender reported June 11, an FDA advisory committee held a virtual meeting Thursday to discuss what data would be needed to vaccinate children under 12 against COVID under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or licensure.
Several experts spoke out against the plan, saying the benefits don't outweigh the risks for young children. Peter Doshi, Ph,D, associate professor University of Maryland School of Pharmacy and senior editor of The BMJ, said during the open public hearing session, there is no emergency that would warrant using EUA to authorize COVID vaccines for children.
Kim Witczak, an FDA consumer representative, expressed great concerns over the premature approval of COVID vaccines for children. Witczak said data shows children are neither in danger or dangerous and questioned the timing of last Friday's CDC announcement of the rise in children being hospitalized with COVID.
Dr. Cody Meissner, director of pediatric infectious diseases at Tufts University School of Medicine, said children are at low risk of severe disease from the virus and more study is needed about safety in younger age groups.
Witczak and Doshi were two of 27 researchers and clinicians around the world who launched a citizen's petition demanding the FDA withhold full approval of COVID vaccines until efficacy and safety measures are met.
The members of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee were not asked to provide specific advice or to vote during the meeting.
Moderna, Pfizer push to vaccinate kids as young as 5 by September
Moderna this week asked the FDA to expand emergency use of its COVID vaccine for adolescents aged 12 to 17. The vaccine maker said its COVID vaccine was 100% effective in a study of 3,700 12-to-17-year-olds.
Moderna and Pfizer both this week said they expect to make their vaccines available to children as young as 5 by September.
As The Defender reported this week, Pfizer is advancing late-stage clinical trials of its COVID vaccine, in lower doses, on children ages 5 to 11 years old and expects to apply for approval early this fall. The study will enroll up to 4,500 children at more than 90 clinical sites in the U.S., Finland, Poland and Spain, the company said.
Based on safety, efficacy and tolerability data from the 144 children included in Pfizer's phase 1 trial, the company will use 10 micrograms of each vaccine dose for kids between the ages of 5 and 11 in phase 2/3 trials, and 3 micrograms of each dose for those 5 and younger.
Moderna said it also expects its COVID vaccine will be available for kids as young as 5 by early fall. CEO Stรฉphane Bancel said Monday he thinks the data will become available sometime in September.
New Cleveland Clinic study shows vaccine provides no added benefit to those who already had COVID
A new preprint study by the Cleveland Clinic found people previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 were less likely to be reinfected than fully vaccinated individuals who never had the virus โ suggesting the vaccine is of no benefit to people who already had COVID.
As The Defender reported, the study, available on medRxiv, provides insight into how the immune system protects the body once a COVID infection is confirmed.
The clinic studied 52,238 employees. Of those, 49,659 never had the virus and 2,579 had COVID and recovered. Of the 2,579 who previously were infected, 1,359, or 53%, remained unvaccinated, compared with 41%, or 22,777 who were vaccinated.
Of all infections during the study period, 99.3% occurred in participants who were not infected previously and remained unvaccinated. In contrast, 0.7% of infections occurred in participants who were not previously infected but were currently vaccinated. Significantly, not one of the 1,359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study.
Pfizer skipped critical testing, documents reveal
New documents obtained by TrialSite News suggest routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use of Pfizer's COVID vaccine, and that U.S. and other governments are conducting a massive vaccination program with an incompletely characterized experimental vaccine.
As The Defender reported June 7, regulatory documents revealed Pfizer didn't thoroughly examine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics issues relating to its vaccine before submitting the vaccine to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for review.
Pfizer also did not use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) for all of its studies, but instead relied on a "surrogate" mRNA that produced the luciferase protein.
According to TrialSite News, it's standard practice for the EMA to disclose its assessment of investigational new drug submissions. In the case of Pfizer's vaccine, the EMA assessment included a summary of the agency's evaluation of the non-clinical vaccine distribution studies reported to EMA by Pfizer โ but the EMA did not disclose the results of Pfizer's biodistribution studies in its public EMA summary.
95 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender's inquiries
According to the CDC website, "the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated."
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. After repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions, a health communications specialist from the CDC's Vaccine Task Force contacted us on March 29 โ three weeks after our initial inquiry.
The individual received our request for information from VAERS, but said she had never received our list of questions, even though employees we talked to several times said CDC press officers were working through the questions and confirmed the representative had received them. We provided the list of questions again along with a new deadline, but never received a response.
On May 19, a CDC employee said our questions had been reviewed and our inquiry was pending in their system, but would not provide us with a copy of the response. We were told we would be contacted by phone or email with the response.
On June 4, the CDC employee we contacted said nobody had responded to our inquiries. We were advised to submit our questions again, which we have done numerous times.
It has been 95 days since we sent our first email inquiring into VAERS data and reports and we have yet to receive a response.
Children's Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.
Reader Comments
U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes said taking the COVID-19 vaccine is not like being part of a clinical trial, nor is it experimental.
The judge noted in the ruling that the U.S. government has advised that businesses can require employees to get COVID-19 vaccines.
"This is not coercion," Hughes said. "Methodist is trying to do their business of saving lives without giving them the COVID-19 virus. It is a choice made to keep staff, patients and their families safer."
This is the first federal court ruling on a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. [Link]
*
Houston attorney Jared Woodfill, who represents Bridges and other clients (and who thought it wise to include a Holocaust analogy in the original complaint), has promised an appeal.
"All of my clients continue to be committed to fighting this unjust policy," he said in a statement, adding. "What is shocking is that many of my clients were on the front line treating COVID-positive patients at Texas Methodist Hospital during the height of the pandemic. As a result, many of them contracted COVID-19. As a thank you for their service and sacrifice, Methodist Hospital awards them a pink slip and sentences them to bankruptcy."
"Weโre taking it all the way Supreme Court," he added.
*
With corrupt judgment like this, Revolution is certain. The only question is when will the shooting start.
The West lost its upper hand, its moral and ethical high ground is gone. Corruption has won. In France it was let them eat cake that surmised the guillotine, โlet them get jabbedโ is the slogan behind the 21st century Revolution.
Comparing this to Nazi Germany is "reprehensible"?
FACT: The Covid vaccine is not FDA approved because it is under EUA or Emergency Use Authorization. The Nuremberg Trials of 1947 forbid Governments from doing what the Nazis did which was to mandate experimental procedures "for the greater good". They are crimes against humanity, punishable by death.
Judge ruled forced vaccines being "experimental and dangerous was False"?!?!?!???
The fact that the FDA has these classified as "Experimental", and over 10,000 people worldwide have already died of them (i.e. "Dangerous"); appears to be lost on this man.
The only good news: This judge's federal judicial service has been "hallmarked by being one of the most reversed judges in the United States Court of Appeals".
Still, even for a heavily reversed judge, this is Simply INSANE.
Some would argue that Judge Lynn Hughes should/will hang by the neck until dead for crimes against humanity.
"They'll win on appeal.
I mean, maybe he did. Maybe he didn't.
It seems to me, Montagnier, at least up to this point, is a man who is very careful with his language.
It'll all come out in the wash, I guess.
*
It is surprising to have a scientist of Montagnierโs stature utter such questionable statements โ although Montagnier himself is a controversial figure. Among other causes, he has supported anti-vaxxers, homeopathy and a silly claim that DNA emits โelectromagnetic wavesโ.
As he lost credibility among his peers, scientific agencies around Europe began to reject his grant applications, and eventually he was left with no money to pursue his ideas. In a 2010 interview, Montagnier said he was leaving Europe to โescape the intellectual terror.โ He added, โIโm no longer allowed to work at a public institute (in France). I have applied for funding from other sources, but I have been turned down.โ [Link]
"Two-years-no-hope-prepare-to-incinerate-the-bodies" remains elusive. Is very interesting stuff and definitely worth a look.
I posted this the other day....[Link]
Plot spoiler not supplied.
Yes, that was my thought, a man careful with his words. After all, he has spent decades in the sociopolitical worlds of, what we call science and biological health.
All it takes is for some hit piece to go viral in the MSM, to destroy a career in science, and the work of a lifetime.
The devil is in the details ...