© AFP/Robyn Beck
The federal appeals court declared that Carla Gericke was exercising her First Amendment right when she attempted to film a late-night traffic stop. Gericke was driving behind Tyler Hanslin, because she did not know the way to his home. When she saw police lights flash behind her, she assumed she was being hailed and pulled over.
Sergeant Joseph Kelley approached her vehicle and told her that he had meant to pull Hanslin over, and she moved her vehicle to a nearby parking lot. Once there, she exited her vehicle and approached Hanslin's with her video camera, informing Sergeant Kelley that she was going to record the encounter. Sergeant Kelley ordered her back to her car, and she complied.
Shortly thereafter, Officer Brandon Montplaisir arrived at the scene, and he approached Gericke and demanded to know where her video camera was. When she refused to tell him, he arrested for her disobeying a police officer. At the station, officers also charged her with unlawful interception of oral communication.
Both charges were eventually dropped.
In her suit, Gericke claimed that the wiretapping charge" constituted retaliatory prosecution in violation of her First Amendment rights," and the First Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, writing that "she was exercising a clearly established First Amendment right when she attempted to film the traffic stop in the absence of a police order to stop filming or leave the area."
"It is clearly established in this circuit that police officers cannot, consistently with the Constitution, prosecute citizens for violating wiretapping laws when they peacefully record a police officer performing his or her official duties in a public area," the appeals court said.
The First Circuit Court's decision means that Gericke's lawsuit against the Weare Police Department for retaliatory prosecution in breach of her constitutionally guaranteed rights can proceed.
". . . when she attempted to film the traffic stop in the absence of a police order to stop filming . . ."
The police should have ZERO authority to give any orders of this type.
Unfortunately, in this police state of ours, the presumption of the laws is that the police have the authority to give ANY orders to the peasants who must obey without question or face arrest, great bodily harm, and/or death.