Health & Wellness
Dr. Steve Porter, a forensic psychologist at Dalhousie University in Halifax, N.S., studies micro expressions and says the face of someone telling a lie is different from someone experiencing true emotion.
"People manifest particular concealed emotions, so how does that express itself on your face?" he told CTV.
Porter looks at emotions frame-by-frame and says it's nearly impossible for someone to mimic the complex muscle movements of such emotions as sadness, stress or despair.
Porter's research revolves around those who have publicly pleaded for the safe return of loved ones, but were later found to be the actual killers.
During his analysis, Porter highlights a particular area of the face, such as the eyes or mouth, and compares the area with a textbook example of someone experiencing a true emotion.
One such case study is Michael White, who was sentenced last year to life in prison for the murder of his pregnant wife.
Long before he was charged, White gave a tearful plea for his wife's return and his own innocence.
"My wife is a good person, never hurts anybody. If she's out there and you see me or you see this, just stay out there and we'll find you," White said.
After analyzing the footage, Porter concluded, "He's showing sadness in the mouth region, but not in the eyes or in the forehead region. In a complete sadness facial expression, we would expect that," Porter said.
"They don't seem to be sincere expressions of sadness," he added.
Porter revealed it was White's real emotions, which were exhibited at inappropriate times, that further led him to conclude he was lying about his wife's disappearance.
"He showed an anger expression in several occasions. Looking at this context, there should not have been displays of anger or disgust and that's what we were seeing."
While it has yet to be used in Canada, Porter's research has been sought out internationally for airport and border crossing safety.
The study of micro expressions is more than 40 years old and was originated by Dr. Paul Ekman in the United States.
Research shows that up to 60 per cent of people lie; males more so than females.
There are numerous physical cues associated with lying. People who aren't telling the truth have a tendency to lean forward more, will lick their lips, handle objects and avert their eyes.
Raising a hand to the nose has also been associated with lying. Scientists say this is due to the engorgement of erectile tissue in the nose that occurs when someone tells a fib.
Verbal cues can also give someone away who is trying to get away with mendacity. Clearing of one's throat, stuttering or not using contractions (such as saying did not versus didn't) are all cues that someone is trying to pull the wool over your eyes.
Reader Comments
It's also important to remember that, as a matter of course, psychopaths do not exhibit the 'tell-tale' signs of lying that a person with a conscience will exhibit. There is no internal conflict in the psychopath as they lie - so the whole fidgeting thing is very misleading - if lying is a way of life, one doesn't lean forward, lick the lips, avert the eyes - there is no reason to because the psychopath is not nervous about it - it is what they do and who they are.
This research sort of turns the lie detector inside out. Instead of looking for tell-tale signs of lying that show up due to nervousness and/or guilt, it is looking for the lack of tell-tale signs of honestly felt emotion. In the same way a psychopath won't feel guilt for lying, they might not exhibit the facial markers of deeply felt emotion even when they are claiming they are feeling it.
Interestingly, this same technique was used in the movie Blade Runner to identify "replicants." They were asked emotionally charged questions while the interviewer examined their eyes looking for the tell-tale clues of actually feeling the emotions the questions should evoke.
In the book "Blink", Silvan Tomkins and his student Paul Ekman are featured, who are both specialists after years of reasearch and experience, on reading the mind as the book calls it through reading the facial expressions. Just like what Steve Porter seems to be doing in above article.
I wonder if expertise in this area IS the major key to identifying the psychopath? They are charmers, and you can't trust their words, while they can fake human emotions with great success. But can they fake their facial expressions if emotions are not truly felt?