Society's Child
People who lie about having travelled to the government's so-called 'red list' of coronavirus hot spot countries will face up to ten years behind bars, putting the offence on par with possession of a firearm with intent, making threats to kill, and poisoning.
Those found to have attempted to breach the mandatory hotel quarantine scheme will be subject to fines of up to £10,000 and anyone who fails to take a mandatory coronavirus test within 72 hours of their departure or upon their second day in quarantine faces a £1,000 penalty.
A £2,000 fine will be issued for those who do not take a second coronavirus test on their eighth day in the country.
Speaking before the House of Commons, Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: "Anyone who lies on a passenger locator form and tries to conceal that they've been in a country on our red list in the 10 days before arrival here will face a prison sentence of up to 10 years."
Mr Hancock said that he makes "no apologies" about draconian measures, claiming that it is "mission-critical" that the UK blocks more coronavirus variants from entering the country.
"People who flout these rules are putting us all at risk," he said, adding: "Passenger carriers will have a duty in law to make sure that passengers have signed up for these new arrangements before they travel, and will be fined if they don't, and we will be putting in place tough fines for people who don't comply."
Travellers will be required to stay in quarantine hotels for 10 days, which will cost £1,750 per person. Mr Hancock said that "people will need to remain in their rooms and will not be allowed to mix with other guests".
"When passengers arrive, they'll be escorted to their UK Government transport and taken to a designated hotel, which will be closed to guests who aren't quarantining," the Health Secretary explained.
"They must quarantine in their room for 10 days, or for longer if they test positive for Covid-19 during their stay," he added.
Brexit leader Nigel Farage blasted the plan, saying: "This is out of control. Ten years in prison for a lie goes too far, we must resist this tyranny."
The move was also questioned by travel industry leaders, fearful that the already struggling sector may further be damaged by the draconian measures.
The CEO of travel consultants The PC Agency, Paul Charles, told the Daily Mail: "Mass traveller testing alone is to be welcomed as it enables Government to stay one step ahead of possible new variants, but adding several layers of complexity to travel will stall any economic recovery."
"What is the exit route out of this? Travel cannot work on the short-term whim of Government," he warned.
Comment: Meanwhile, the UK's SAGE team have suggested they may be keeping this up for YEARS. From RT:
A member of the UK government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has claimed that lockdowns could be a part of people's lives for "several years" as variants of Covid-19 mutate.And apparently the British environment secretary has expressed disappointment that NHS workers have been turning down the jab. Again from RT:
Professor Sir Ian Boyd, who teaches at the University of St Andrews' School of Biology, warned this week against the frequent lifting of lockdowns because "it simply fuels a new wave of disease" that can cause the virus to replicate more and mutate into new strains.
"There are a lot of reasons for taking pain now in order to create conditions for controlled release from [restrictions] a lot easier," he argued, adding, "Otherwise we risk just passing through phases of various levels of lockdown and release."
Boyd said that lockdowns "could go on for a long time," despite the UK's mass vaccination program. "My suspicion is that we will experience a damped oscillation of control-release for a long time to come — perhaps several years."
The British environment secretary has bemoaned the decision of some National Health Service (NHS) staff not to get the Covid-19 vaccine, with those turning down the jab highest in ethnic minority groups.
"Obviously it is disappointing if people working in our NHS, who themselves in very small numbers, have decided not to have the vaccine," Environment Secretary George Eustice told Sky News on Tuesday morning.
"We want to get maximum protection particularly for those vulnerable cohorts but also for those such as those working in the NHS who are particularly exposed, and the vast majority of them have taken up the vaccine."
Amid discussion around whether employers should be able to mandate their employees to be vaccinated, Eustice suggested the NHS would not be forcing staff to get the jab despite being on the frontline of healthcare provision.
In late January, the board of Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust reported that while overall 80 percent of its staff had been vaccinated, only a quarter of black-African and black-Caribbean staff had taken the jab. Rates were even lower among Filipino and Bangladeshi workers.
Director of workforce Daniel Waldron said that rates were lowest among Filipino staff who are employed in their thousands by the NHS after heavy recruitment campaigns in recent years.
Other hospital trust bosses in London told the Health Service Journal that they had encountered similar issues.
One said: "Most of our white staff have been vaccinated and few of our BAME staff have. This is a real concern given that the majority of our hands-on clinical staff are black."
There is growing concern about 'vaccine hesitancy' among BAME groups in the UK. On Monday, it was reported that a vaccination centre had to close early on three days last week because of "really low patient uptake" in an east London borough. Forty-five percent of the area's residents were considered non-white in the 2011 census.
Reader Comments
Yes, but how , Mr Farage? Unless a lot of insiders like yourself overpower these tyrants, there's little defenceless sheeple can do.
"People who flout these rules are putting us all at risk,"Since this sub-human is obviously an illegal immigrant from Upsidedownland, let me translate that for all you people unfamiliar with the way they speak. Basically, all you have to do is invert the literal meaning of what they say to decode the truth of the matter.
Here is the English version:
"People who enforce these rules are putting us all at risk,"See how That works? It works on virtually anything that comes from the mouth of the modern liberal. Not kidding even a little. Try it. It's fun and revealing, and adds much needed truth to our mainstream news headlines and talking points. It works on their science and political rhetoric as well. Like I said, virtually anything the liberal says is not just untrue, but is the polar opposite of the truth.
They only want your Best !
Ignorance is Strength !