Lead, mercury, and aluminum scientifically are known neurotoxins!

Lead is condemned by science and medicine; whereas ethylmercury and aluminum are promoted and used in medicine with apparent recklessness. Science has been prostituted when it comes to mercury and aluminum in vaccines.

Flint, Michigan's water crisis has grown legs to the point where criminal charges are being filed. Those charges result from a period of about only two years of Flint's residents being poisoned by lead in their municipal water supply.

Vaccines, which have contained ethylmercury in the form of Thimerosal and aluminum in as many as four formulations—all being neurotoxins—for decades, undoubtedly causing adverse health reactions, especially since the CDC's VAERS reporting system contains hundreds of thousands of adverse reports, plus the U.S. Court of Federal Claims has paid out in excess of $3.3 BILLION [1] to date for vaccine damages. Why, if vaccines are supposed to be safe?

On page 5 of the Vaccine Compensation Data Statistics Report [PDF] we see that 1,191 death claims have been filed, which are included in the grand total of 16,878 claims filed as of the reporting date. Those claims represent the years 1988 to 2016! That's a heck of a lot longer than two years, I'd say.

Furthermore, on page 5 we see that more than 30 vaccines are involved with having been the source of harm to innocent infants [2], toddlers, teens, and adults. However, in Flint it was only one commodity: water, which everyone used.

Just about everyone at every level of society is incensed about Flint's water crimes, but hardly anyone is concerned about all those who are and have been damaged by vaccines—globally too. What is it that I'm not getting about human compassion or everyone does not understand a serious public health problem apparently resulting from fraud and deceit within the U.S. CDC, its scientists, and tobacco pseudoscience?

As far back as the Simpsonwood Meeting the CDC held in June of 2000, we find:
After the Simpsonwood gathering, the CDC also instructed the Institute of Medicine (IOM), i.e., the National Academy of Sciences, to produce a new study with contrived results: no correlation between thimerosal and brain disorders. According to Dr. Marie McCormick, who chaired the IOM's Immunization Safety Review Committee in January 2001, the CDC "wants us to declare, well, that these things are pretty safe." In fact, "we are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect" of thimerosal. In transcripts of the meeting, the committee's chief staffer, Kathleen Stratton, predicted that the IOM would conclude that the evidence was "inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation" between thimerosal and autism. Apparently, that was what "Walt wants"—a reference to Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the CDC's National Immunization Program. [3]
Flint city employees are being prosecuted—and rightfully so, but no one at the CDC, or elsewhere in federal health agencies, is being prosecuted, or even reprimanded, for deliberately concealing from publication and destroying incriminating research connecting vaccines with autism in young black boys, as documented by the CDC's study lead epidemiologist William Thompson, PhD. [4]

Something is terribly wrong with ethics, medicine, law, and, in particular, federal government alphabet health agencies like HHS, CDC, and FDA for not jumping all over the fraud that has been committed by government employees and government scientists. How about Congress, which has oversight? Nada, nothing, zilch! Why do the media ignore vaccine damage when they're all over the Flint water damage?

Where's the outrage about that?

What's being protected at all costs? Is it the consensus-science that's been sacrificing innocent infants, toddlers, and teens lives to Big Pharma's poisoned needles?

If society isn't allowing city government employees [5] to get away with the Flint water 'caper', why are we allowing federal government agencies to get away with fraudulent science and even deaths—due to vaccines?


[1] vaccinecompensation/data/statisticsreport.pdf pg. 9
[3] Source: as cited in the monograph "Vaccines & Vaccinations: The Need for Congressional Investigation, January 2011"