OF THE
TIMES
" Comment: Encouraging news, but it could be a feint. The same regulations on censorship and centralization of power could still be brought in...
At the end of the day - may the best ideas prevail. The chips are on the table. Place your bets!
Excellent SOTT comment.
Quote: "You gotta include the media, think tanks, and academia in this โ in addition to the military-industrial complex and the political class....
Cynthia Chung is one of the best journalist/historians at revealing the dark underbelly of USA created wars to subjugate countries, murder the...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
As readers of this site may know there has been at least one other allegation from "someone who should know" that the recent Bin Laden killing was a hoax.
For some time now, Alex Jones has been quoting physician Steve R. Pieczenik, a former government consultant and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, that he knew from CIA sources that Bin Laden had Marfan Syndrome and could not have survived past the end of 2001.
Another talk show regular has been reporting that his CIA contacts told him that Bin Laden died in early 2002. Now this guy, also ex-CIA, tells us it was 2006.
So the CIA is sure he died of natural causes, but not sure when.
And we are also told that the CIA was instrumental in this latest Bin Laden "death."
So all that is clear to me, besides it being almost a sure bet that Bin Laden is by now really deceased, is that the CIA has been trying to control the "spin" on the Bin Laden story ever since they acquired him as an asset (Tim Osman) in 1986.
But the CIA is a kind of group dramatization of a psychopath - will tell any lie necessary to accomplish what it wants. So why should we count on any "facts" that cite the CIA as their source?
Seems to me they lost their credibility decades ago.