Puppet MastersS

Info

Trump defends wishing Ghislaine Maxwell "good luck" in prison

axios trump interview
President Trump referred repeatedly during an "Axios on HBO" interview to Jeffrey Epstein's death in prison custody, citing it when asked about his prior comments wishing Ghislaine Maxwell good luck in the criminal justice system.

Why it matters: Maxwell has been charged with multiple counts of allegedly helping Epstein sexually abuse minor girls. She was arrested in New Hampshire in early July.

Info

Best of the Web: Trump promises to 'act under my authority' if congress won't pass economic stimulus bill

trump
© REUTERS / Joshua Roberts
US President Donald Trump has vowed to use his executive powers to get an economic stimulus bill into legislation if congressional Democrats and Republicans fail to reach an agreement in the near future.

Speaking from Bedminster, New Jersey, on Friday, Trump remarked that Democrats in Congress are holding up federal economic relief with "radical left-wing" demands.

"If Democrats continue to hold this critical relief hostage, I will act under my authority as president to get Americans the relief they need," he said.

Binoculars

Trump: John Durham has uncovered 'breathtaking' evidence of spying

john durham
U.S. Special Counsel John Durham
U.S. Attorney John Durham has uncovered "breathtaking" evidence about "corrupt" origins of the Russia investigation, according to President Trump.

He told Fox Business host Lou Dobbs on Tuesday that he believes that the federal prosecutor is conducting a criminal inquiry into the Russia investigation that will show members of the Obama administration maliciously targeted him and his campaign.

"We caught them spying. Now it's up to our attorney general. As you know, I wanted them to do it. I didn't want to get overly involved. Maybe I should, maybe I shouldn't, but I do hear it's breathtaking what they've found," Trump said. "That's all I can say, breathtaking."

Comment: See also:


Vader

Best of the Web: Irish govt announces 'first of many' regional lockdowns as 'dozens' of Covid-19 cases reported


Comment: And yes, by 'lockdown', they mean house imprisonment every bit as stringent as what the whole country went through from March to May. Which means many more unnecessary deaths to come...


police ireland checkpoint covid-19
Irish police issue govt orders at checkpoints: 'Stay home, stop living, watch TV'.
More lockdowns of counties will be rolled out across the country in a bid to stamp out clusters of Covid-19 at their source.

Gardaรญ [police] are to mount checkpoints in Kildare, Offaly and Laois for the next two weeks in an attempt to keep 385,000 residents in effective lockdown.

Non-essential travel to and from the counties is now banned, while restaurants, pubs and other industries have been told they must close their doors.

The move was met with a backlash from some business representatives, who described it as a "knee-jerk reaction" that would cost jobs.

Comment: All this for a grand total of "1,768 Covid19-related deaths in Ireland."

Over 6 months.

It looks like the One World Govt - especially in the anglosphere - isn't relinquishing its deathly grip on western populations any time soon. 'Liberal' fascism is here to stay.


Bomb

Best of the Web: 'Possibility of external interference': Lebanon's president expands blast probe, Hezbollah denies presence of weapons depot

Aoun
© AFPLebanon's President Michel Aoun (C) wears a protective face mask as he visits the site of a massive explosion the previous day in the heart of the Lebanese Beirut on August 5, 2020.
Lebanon's president said on Friday an investigation into the biggest blast in Beirut's history would examine whether "external interference" had a role, as residents tried to rebuild their shattered lives and homes after the explosion.

The search for those missing intensified, as rescuers sifted rubble in a race to find anyone still alive after Tuesday's explosion that killed 154, smashed up a swathe of the city and sent shockwaves around the region.

"The cause has not been determined yet. There is a possibility of external interference through a rocket or bomb or other act," President Michel Aoun said in comments carried by local media and confirmed by his office.

He said it would also consider whether it was a result of negligence or an accident. He previously blamed negligence in the storage of highly explosive material for years at the port.

The United States has previously said it has not ruled out an attack. Israel, which has fought several wars with Lebanon, has also previously denied it had any role.

Comment: Hezbollah leader Nasrallah has denied accusations that the port was being used to store Hezbollah arms:
"I absolutely deny that we have any weapons warehouse [at the port]," he said, adding that broader claims that Hezbollah runs Beirut's ports "are lies."

"We have nothing in the port: not an arms depot, nor a missile depot nor missiles nor rifles nor bombs nor bullets nor ammonium nitrate," he said, adding that any investigation will confirm this.

Nasrallah pointed out that Hezbollah members were among those killed and injured in the blast, and stressed that only an impartial investigation will reveal the truth about what happened. He emphasized that the investigation must be transparent and thorough, that "nobody should be protected," and that those responsible must be held to account.

Nasrallah suggested that the military, as an institution trusted by all sectors of society, should be allowed to conduct the investigation into the blast if the country's political forces agree. Alternatively, he said, a mixed committee including the army and other forces can be formed.
Another video of the explosions has come to our attention. It shows both the fire, then the first explosion, followed about 20 seconds later by the major blast. Curiously, you hear the sound of what seem to be jet engines just before the first explosion.


See also:


2 + 2 = 4

Sally Yates: DOJ watchdog findings would have stopped me from signing Carter Page FISA warrants

James Clapper and Sally Yates
© AP Photo/ Pablo Martinez Monsivais
A former top Justice Department official admitted she would not have signed off on two Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications targeting Trump campaign associate Carter Page if she knew then what she knows now.

Sally Yates, the deputy attorney general under President Barack Obama who briefly served as acting attorney general during the first 10 days of Trump's presidency, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee via video link on Wednesday as part of its investigation into the origins of the FBI's counterintelligence inquiry into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.

Yates said that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz unearthed a host of glaring problems with the process of obtaining warrants to wiretap Page and said that she would not have approved the first application in October 2016 or the first renewal in January 2017 if these issues had been disclosed at the time.

"I wouldn't sign anything that I knew to contain errors or omissions," she told Chairman Lindsey Graham during his line of questioning.

Comment: With Russiagate all but blown wide open as the hoax it really was, there's nothing left but to plead ignorance - all just a big mistake, you see!

Yates also slammed Comey, saying the interview with General Flynn was conducted without her authorization - she conceded that he had indeed "gone rogue". She was also allegedly angry that the FBI agents hadn't informed Flynn that they were in possession of his conversations with then-Ambassador Kislyak.


No Entry

Trump gives TikTok, WeChat 45 days to sell, or leave United States

tiktok logo
TikTok has 45 days from Thursday to find a buyer for its U.S. operations or the popular social media site will be banned, according to an executive order signed by President Trump on Thursday evening. He signed another order later that evening enacting a similar ban on WeChat, a social network, messaging platform, and forum for online payments.

National security concerns have circled these platforms for months, due to both companies being owned by Chinese entities. TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese tech company, which has joint ventures with state-run entities. WeChat is owned by Chinese tech company Tencent, which faces accusations of censoring private conversations. Both face accusations of censoring content that is politically undesirable for the Chinese Communist Party and sharing user data with the Chinese government.

Comment: The order vaguely bans Americans from any dealings with the parent companies ByteDance and Tencent (which has many gamers worried, as the company is heavily invested in numerous gaming companies and platforms). TikTok is naturally "shocked" by the news, and has threatened legal action:
"We are shocked by the recent Executive Order, which was issued without any due process," the social media platform wrote on its website. "For nearly a year, we have sought to engage with the US government in good faith to provide a constructive solution to the concerns that have been expressed."

"What we encountered instead was that the Administration paid no attention to facts, dictated terms of an agreement without going through standard legal processes, and tried to insert itself into negotiations between private businesses."
China hypocritically calls it a "blatant hegemonic act" - with no mention of their longstanding bans on countless American apps - and urges the U.S. to stop "politicizing" relations:
"These companies carry out business activities in the United States in accordance with market principles and international rules, and abide by US law and regulations. The US uses national security as an excuse to frequently abuse national power and unreasonably suppress non-American companies. This is a blatant hegemonic act."

Wang urged the US to stop "politicizing economic issues" and create a "fair and non-discriminatory environment" for foreign companies.
It may not be right, but it's certainly fair, given China's heavy-handed methods on their own soil. As with most governments, it's fair when we do it, unfair when anyone else does. In that regard, governments are the original SJW victim-mentality crybabies.


MIB

Arrest of 33 'Russian mercenaries' in Belarus may have been orchestrated by Ukrainian intelligence - newspaper investigation

wagner belarus
The paper trail behind 33 Russian citizens who were arrested in Belarus last week, and labelled mercenaries hired to destabilize the country, has been traced to Ukraine and could be a provocation by its intelligence services.

That's according to investigative journalist Aleksandr Kots of Moscow newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, who is known to have good sources in the Russian military.

Last week, Belarus detained the Russians, described as a group of hired guns sent to orchestrate turmoil and torpedo the upcoming presidential election. The Russian citizens were named as members of Wagner, a Russian private military company (PMC) accused in the West of supplying fighters throughout the world in alignment with Moscow's foreign policy goals.

The arrests may have been the result of a clandestine operation by Ukrainian intelligence, Kots revealed. The men involved have backgrounds as security contractors. The reporter says the recruitment was done under false pretenses and involved a Ukrainian tour operator.

According to Kots, the suspected frame-up started with a man who claimed to be seeking guards for protecting oil industry sites in Syria. He used a phone number that appeared to be located in the Middle Eastern nation, but was actually untraceable. The recruiter introduced himself as Sergey, had intimate knowledge of the PMC industry, and was interested in as many as 90 fighters.

In May, another man posing as a security official of Russian oil giant Rosneft joined the scheme and suggested boosting the number of recruits to 180. Next month, the fake Rosneft boss told the hires that 'Sergey' had been killed in action and that the company wanted to send them to Venezuela to work as guards there.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

US Gov & Yale hold clinical trials to test "Persuasive Messages For COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake"

covid vaccine
What Happened

The US Federal government in collaboration with Yale University held clinical trials to determine what the best messaging would be to persuade Americans to take the COVID-19 vaccine when it is ready. The news of this study does show an interest in finding the best way to persuade people into an ideal decision for the Federal government, and likely vaccine makers, and it also shows that a mandatory vaccine campaign may still be the plan B down the road, as opposed to plan A.

The official title of the trial is, "Persuasive Messages for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: a Randomized Controlled Trial, Part 1."

According to the brief summary for trial:
This study tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available. Participants are randomized to 1 of 12 arms, with one control arm and one baseline arm. We will compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available between the 10 intervention arms to the 2 control arms.

Study participants are recruited online by Lucid, which matches census based sampling in online recruitment.
The study essentially looks at the best possible messaging that can be used on Americans, ranging from expressing vaccine benefits, to using messaging about economic impact, making someone feel guilty or embarrassed for not taking the vaccine, and so on.

Comment: Perhaps the vaccine pushers have come to realize that the following messaging doesn't work (for a whole host of reasons). The following is from 2010 - when the Swine Flu pandemic scare was getting propagated. And we now know is that Swine flu was a big dud...




Target

Masks are a psychological preparation for mandatory vaccinations

Fauci in mask
This respirator does not protect against the risk of contracting disease or infection. โ€” Warning with a box of N-95 respirators.
You have no right not to be vaccinated. You have no right not to wear a mask. You have no right to open up your business .... If you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor's office and plunge a needle into your arm. โ€” Alan Dershowitz
The lockdown, along with the fear campaign with its daily doses of death statistics and warnings of impending spikes, is a full assault being advanced stepwise toward a dystopia of globalist design. The masks that now dominate on faces everywhere place wearers and non wearers into one or the other of two sharply defined categories, each category carrying a list of traits in the minds of those in the opposite category. What a perfect, visible way to split The People into competing teams. Wearers are sheep!; the maskless are public hazards!

Corporate media is pushing the division with all of its corporate gusto, and if one is looking for a stark example of MSM divisiveness, it would be hard to beat this from Politico: "Wearing a mask is for smug liberals. Refusing to is for reckless Republicans". Simple, no? In such an either-or world, fine distinctions within complex issues are not to be entertained, with the result that life-long leftists, if contending against the mask, are assumed to be solidly in the hardcore, rightwing Trump camp, fit for a MAGA hat.

Comment: See also: As well as: