Puppet MastersS


Magnify

Taiwan ditches plan to buy US-made anti-sub helicopters, Taipei still waiting on $14 billion in military equipment it ordered in 2019

US helicopter
Taipei said it can't afford excessively pricey military equipment
Taiwan's Defense Minister Chiu Kuo-cheng has said that Taipei will abandon its plan to purchase new US anti-submarine warfare helicopters produced by Lockheed Martin Corp, saying they were excessively pricey.

"The price is too high, beyond the scope of our country's ability," the island's defense chief said at a parliamentary hearing on Thursday.

Local media, however, have reported that Washington rejected the sale, in the belief that it was not in line with the island nation's needs.


Comment: That seems unlikely, because the US is incredibly keen to weaponise Taiwan against China, as it has done with Ukraine against Russia: US to approve another arms deal with Taiwan totaling $940 million in the last year, in latest provocation against China


Washington has failed to deliver on previous contractual obligations to Taiwan.

Comment: One wonders whether this is simply greed or whether China has helped Taiwan to think twice about such a deal; notably in the last few months US-aligned South Korea refuted claims that it was intending to supply the country with a submarine.

Also check out SOTT radio's:



Eye 2

Israel to substantially increase military aid to Ukraine's neo-Nazi aligned military

Azov Battalion
© Twitter @BenjaminNortonIsraeli newspaper the Jerusalem Post admits that Israeli weapons are being used by Ukraine's neo-Nazi Azov Battalion against Russian military forces.
Although the increase in aid would be a substantial step, no offensive weapons will be delivered so far to fight Russian forces, diplomatic sources told the newspaper.

Israel will increase its military aid to the Ukrainian Government, amid growing diplomatic tensions with Russia, Haaretz reported on Wednesday.

Although the increase in aid would be a substantial step, no offensive weapons will be delivered so far to fight Russian forces, diplomatic sources told the newspaper.


Comment: Are we really expected to believe that no offensive weapons will be delivered? Moreover, delivering anything but humanitarian aid is very revealing as to Israel's intentions.


Comment: Note that this is an increase in military aid, but it's not the first tranche, because, tellingly, Israel has been arming Ukraine's neo-Nazi military for at least seven years now, and Putin has repeatedly warned them against doing so.

In the last few weeks there have been a few reports revealing that relations between Russia and Israel are becoming frayed: And check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Context And Near-Future Outcomes




Arrow Down

Terror from Balochistan: a menacing tool to disrupt Sino-Pakistani economics

A Baloch suicide bombing targeting Chinese workers in Karachi comes a mere month after the US-backed ousting of PM Imran Khan. Pakistan is a critical BRI hub in Beijing's vast Eurasian connectivity project, and it looks like CPEC is the ultimate target of this disruption.
Balochistan
© The CradleBalochistan can only benefit from Chinese infrastructure investment in the immensely impoverished Pakistani province. But an uptick in attacks on Chinese workers by militant separatists suggests that external agendas may be in play.
This is the concise story of how a suicide bombing may carry the potential to subvert the whole, ongoing, complex process of Eurasia integration.

Recently, the Balochistan Liberation Movement (BLA) had released an ISIS-influenced video threatening "Chinese officials and installations" in Pakistan's vast province.

Yet what actually happened in late April was a suicide bombing outside of the University of Karachi's Confucius Institute - not Balochistan - and targeting Chinese teachers, not "officials and installations."

The suicide bomber was a woman, Shaari Baloch, alias Bramsh, who detonated her vest just as a van carrying Institute staff members approached the entrance. The attack was claimed by the BLA's Majeed Brigade, which stressed that this was the first time they used a female suicide bomber.

Shaari Baloch was a schoolteacher with a Zoology degree, enrolled to pursue a second Master's degree, married to a dentist and professor at Makran Medical College in her hometown of Turbat, in southern Balochistan. Her three brothers include a doctor, a deputy director at a government-funded project, and a civil servant. So Shaari Baloch was far from being a mere destitute online-indoctrinated Salafi-jihadi.

The Pakistani Foreign Office had to stress the obvious: this was a "direct attack on the Pakistan-China friendship and ongoing cooperation," always qualified, by both sides, as "iron brothers." Pakistan is an absolutely key node of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to connect the Eurasian landmass.

This was no standard terrorist attack. Its reverberations are immense - not only in one of Pakistan's provinces and South Asia regionally, but for the whole of Eurasia. It may be a harbinger of serious turbulence ahead.

Shaari Baloch's act of desperation should be seen, to start with, as the embodiment of a deep-seated Baloch alienation felt by the educated middle classes, from lawyers and traders to students, constantly permeating the complex relationship with a distant Islamabad. A significant part of the puzzle is that 26 Pakistani intel agencies never saw it coming.

Baloch leaders instantly made the point that the best possible reaction would be to call a Grand Jirga - modeled on the Shahi Jirga practiced at the time of the partition of the subcontinent - that would unite all tribal elders to address the most pressing local grievances.

Megaphone

The day America lost its status as the 'ultimate defender' of human rights

United Nations Human Rights Council room
© AFP / FABRICE COFFRINIUnited Nations Human Rights Council room in Geneva
May 4, 2001 marks the day when the US was voted off the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. The decision should have provided the superpower with a much-needed wakeup call. Instead, it just became more reckless on the global stage.

With the benefit of hindsight, there was no loss of irony about Washington losing its seat on the body for the first time since the panel's founding in 1947. That's because, as far as America's track record on human rights was concerned, the 'best' was yet to come. In a few short years, the United States would rewrite the book for inhumane behavior in its decades-long War on Terror. And while that is something nobody could have predicted in May 2001, perhaps the feeling that America had lost its moral compass was already in the air.

One of the stated reasons for the Geneva-based organization voting out the global power was its increasing frustration with Washington balking on its commitment to international treaties, such as the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. In direct opposition to the opinions of its European allies, George W. Bush withdrew Washington's tentative support for the measure, arguing it would cause "serious harm to the US economy."

Telephone

CIA trying to contact Russians who are against Ukraine war via dark web

CIA web
© Twitter/phys.org/KJNCIA web
The CIA is trying to contact Russians who are against the war in Ukraine and has offered a secure way to contact the agency. The spy agency wants Russians to communicate with them through a website the CIA set up on the dark web.

"We are providing Russian-language instructions on how to safely contact CIA — via our Dark Web site or a reputable VPN — for those who feel compelled to reach us because of the Russian government's unjust war," a CIA official told CBS News.

According to CBS, the CIA established a site on the dark web in 2019 and has used it to elicit information from people across the world. The CIA has released instructions in Russian on how to access the site on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and other social media sites.

The site requires users to use the web browser Tor, which encrypts a user's internet activity. The CIA is hoping that Russians, both civilians, and soldiers, will use the site to give information to the US.

Comment: We have your number. We know who you are!



Pistol

US spies are organizing assassinations against Russian military leaders in Ukraine

NYT headline
© Daniel Berehulak/New York TimesA Russian tank stuck in the mud in Zavorychi, outside the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, early April
Knowing now that US spies are using their proxies in Kiev to assassinate Russian military leaders, it's clear that this is truly the hottest proxy war of the New Cold War thus far. The New York Times' report, which is deemed credible by the average Westerner, now opens the narrative doors for Russia to asymmetrically respond if it so chooses.

The New York Times (NYT) revealed that US-led NATO's proxy war on Russia through Ukraine has escalated to the point where American spies are now feeding intelligence to Kiev that's then used to assassinate Russian military leaders in that former Soviet Republic. It should have been taken for granted that this was already happening but the "politically correct" narrative up until recently was that no such thing had occurred nor ever would occur since the US isn't officially at war with Russia. Those who described its billions of dollars of military assistance to Kiev as proof of an American proxy war on Russia were smeared as "conspiracy theorists" and "Russian agents", up until now at least.

Propaganda

US is world's 'greatest propagator of disinformation' - Senator

PaulMayorkas
© GOPUSA/Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/Pasquines/KJNUS Senator Rand Paul • Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
Due to its long track record of disinformation, the US government has no right to tell the American people what the truth is, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has stated. He went [on] to list a number of examples of where Washington had lied to its own people and the rest of the world.

During a Senate hearing on Wednesday, Paul grilled Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas over the so-called 'Disinformation Governance Board' his agency has announced to supposedly help social media platforms filter out 'fake news.' Paul pointed out:
"Here's the problem: we can't even agree what disinformation is. You can't even agree if it was disinformation that the Russians fed information to the Steele dossier."
He was referring to the controversial and largely discredited report that relied on info from anonymous sources to allege collusion between the Donald Trump campaign and Moscow ahead of the 2016 presidential election in the US.
"If you can't agree to that, how are we ever going to come to an agreement on what is disinformation, so that you can police it on social media?

"Do you know who the greatest propagator of disinformation in the history of the world is? The US government!"

Comment: See also:


Clipboard

Brazil's Lula names those responsible for Ukraine conflict

Lula da Silva
© Rodrigo Paiva/Getty ImagesBrazil presidential candidate Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
Brazilian presidential frontrunner Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Time magazine on Wednesday that he believes the Western narrative on the Ukraine crisis is simplistic and fails to reflect the reality behind the situation. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is "as responsible as [Russian President Vladimir] Putin for the war," he outlined, insisting that there is never just one guilty party in a conflict. While arguing that the US President Joe Biden could have averted the crisis, Lula remarked:
Zelensky "could have said: 'Come on, let's stop talking about this NATO business, about joining the EU for a while. Let's discuss a bit more first. The United States has a lot of political clout. And Biden could have avoided [the conflict], not incited it."
Lula believes the privileged position handed Zelensky by all western politicians is unjustifiable, noting that while he sees
"the president of Ukraine, speaking on television, being applauded, getting a standing ovation by all the [European] parliamentarians, Zelensky is "as responsible as Putin for the war.

"You are encouraging this guy, and then he thinks he is the cherry on your cake. We should be having a serious conversation. OK, you were a nice comedian. But let us not make war for you to show up on TV."

Arrow Down

West pressuring African countries, demanding to condemn Russia says Russian ambassador to Angola

Lourenço
© Getty imagesJoão Lourenço, President of Angola
Western countries are putting extreme pressure on African states to condemn Russia's actions in Ukraine, even resorting to threats, which is immoral. Russian Ambassador to Angola Vladimir Tararov told Sputnik:
"I know that they [Angolans] are under extreme pressure from Western countries, who call on them to condemn Russia. But they expressly behave in this way, saying that 'we will contribute to the establishment of peace, we will contribute with all our might so that agreements are reached between the parties.'"
The ambassador stressed that in its demands the West sometimes resorts to threats and blackmail, which is immoral. According to Tararov, the West is "threatening, blackmailing" the countries of Africa. And under this extraordinary pressure, African countries are "barely able to resist."

He also underscored that during the General Assembly vote to exclude Russia from the UN Human Rights Council on April 7:
"Many African countries voted neutrally, that is, they abstained. This means they did not support this resolution. But they did not dare to vote against it, because the pressure was extreme."

Comment: Where there is will, is there is a way?
Angola is prepared to search for ways to bypass anti-Russian sanctions, if necessary, in order to maintain cooperation with Russia. Russian Ambassador to Angola Vladimir Tararov verified:
"I have talked with Angolan government officials, they all understand what is going on and have said: 'we will be looking for alternative paths and using them where necessary.' I believe this has grounds, real opportunities for sidestepping the sanctions."
The ambassador noted that the cooperation between Russia and Angola cannot be threatened by the sanctions imposed by the European Union on Moscow and that the Angolans are interested in developing bilateral economic cooperation.

EU member states and several countries outside the bloc have sanctioned Russia for starting a military operation in Ukraine, which was at the request of the breakaway Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics. The European Union is now drafting its sixth package of sanctions against Moscow, which, according to reports, may contain an oil embargo.

Angola lacks the infrastructure at the moment to replace Russia as a supplier of gas to Europe, Vladimir Tararov said. The ambassador noted the increase in the number of European officials, including ministers, arriving in Angola in a bid to bargain a deal. Tararov said:
"They are very concerned that they cannot agree on payments with Russia and, of course, they want to stock resources from other countries. They are trying to find an alternative and, among others, they have their eye on Angola. I would like to stress that Angola has potential capacities, but, you know, it lacks the infrastructure yet."
There is only one plant in Angola, which produces about 74.5 million cubic meters of gas annually, while Russia's daily output exceeds tens of billions of cubic meters, the ambassador said. Moreover, about two-thirds of Angola's gas output goes to the domestic market.
"Therefore, of course, they are not able to assist in the coming years. So, yes, it is promising, but for the future, and not in the coming years, although Americans and Europeans have already started working with them [Angola] to actively develop this industry."



Eye 1

Is the West waging war on disinformation or dissent?

Keyboard fake news propaganda hoax
© Getty Images / Peter Dazeley
As populism rises in the West, so do crackdowns on narratives that deviate from those of the state

When US President Joe Biden announced on April 27 that a new Disinformation Governance Board would serve the Department of Homeland Security, it was just the latest turn of the screw on freedom. This time, it's an affront to citizens' right to a diversity of information.

It's one thing to correct inaccurate information, but this new entity seems more oriented towards narrative-policing that cracks down on the interpretation of information rather than the accuracy of it. Headed by a former communications advisor to the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, Nina Jankowicz, one of the board's first responsibilities will be to address "disinformation coming from Russia as well as misleading messages about the US-Mexico border," according to CBS News. Interesting that these two issues - immigration and foreign conflicts - are currently viewed as two of Washington's most significant failures, which have given rise to populist dissent. Make no mistake, it's the dissent that's the ultimate target.