Puppet MastersS


Vader

Blowhard Pompeo takes aim at Huawei, other Chinese tech companies: 'Trojan Horses' for Beijing spying


RT
Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:49 UTC
pompeo wang yi esper huawei
© Reuters / REUTERS/Andreas Gebert/Andrew Caballero-ReynoldsMike Pompeo, Wang Yi and Mark Esper at the Munich Security Conference
Tech firms that receive support from Beijing serve as instruments of Chinese intelligence, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has alleged, in the latest verbal volley aimed at Huawei and other Chinese companies.

"Huawei and other Chinese state-backed tech companies are Trojan horses for Chinese intelligence," Pompeo said in a speech at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday. The US secretary of state took on the Chinese tech giant while speaking about what he believes are the biggest threats to modern security.

Mirroring Pompeo's sentiments, US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told the conference that Washington would like to see "allied and US tech companies" develop their own technologies in order to compete with Chinese firms.

Comment: China fires back:
Beijing has issued a scathing rebuke of Mike Pompeo's claim that China is involved in covert activities as part of its desire to obtain greater power, noting that the allegation might be true - if he were referring to Washington.

"All these accusations against China are lies, not based on facts," Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the Munich Security Conference on Saturday. "But if we replace the subject of the lie from China to America, maybe those lies become facts?"

Washington has repeatedly claimed that Huawei poses an existential security threat to its allies. However, these allegations have been largely dismissed by Europe. The UK has already decided to allow Huawei limited participation in its 5G network, and countries such as Germany, Portugal and Italy have been vocal critics of US pressure to cut all ties with the Chinese firm.
It doesn't seem to matter how many times Huawei assures the Deep State neocons it has no intention of conducting intelligence activities or how many other cyber experts confirm those assertions. China bad is the message for the masses. In the meantime, it has emerged that the US has in effect been running a global 'PRISM' illegal surveillance network, intercepting diplomatic messages of dozens of 'friendly' countries for decades, and that they did it by selling the hi-tech services of a Swiss encryption firm (which doubled as a CIA front) which had backdoor access.

Do as we say, not as we do!

Read More...
Airplane Paper

Not a big surprise: White House memo says Soleimani strike was 'response' to past attacks instead of 'imminent' threat


RT
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:39 UTC
soleimani
© Reuters / West Asia News Agency / Nazanin TabatabaeePeople gather in Tehran to mourn during a forty-day memorial for Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a US air strike in January.
The US drone strike that killed a top Iranian general was ordered in retaliation for previous attacks, the White House said in a memo, contradicting earlier claims that an "imminent" threat justified the assassination.


Comment: You mean, they ... lied? Imagine our total lack of shock.


Now over a month removed from the targeted killing of Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, the White House on Friday has offered yet another rationale for the operation, the latest in a series of alternating arguments offered by the president and Pentagon officials.

"The president directed this action in response to an escalating series of attacks in preceding months by Iran and Iran-backed militias on United States forces and interests in the Middle East," the memo said.

While the document notes that the assassination was meant to "protect" American troops and "deter Iran" from future attacks, US President Donald Trump previously maintained Soleimani was killed specifically "because they were looking to blow up our embassy" - later expanding the alleged Iranian plot to four American embassies.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper initially questioned that assertion, telling CBS "I didn't see [a threat] to four embassies," but eventually came around to "the president's view," all the while providing no evidence for any of the conflicting accounts.

Comment: The Iranians have a sane view of the situation:
"It's unfortunate that the United States, based on misinformation, based on ignorance and arrogance, combined on a course that has brought the region very close to the brink. [...] We were very close to a war", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.

[Regarding the retaliatory strike on the American base in Iraq:] "We wanted to show to the United States that they could not bully Iran. Actions against Iran will have repercussions, but the intention was not to kill anybody [...] The intention was to send a message, a very clear message to the United States, that if they kill Iranians, we will hit back", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.
...
Zarif detailed that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had written an "extremely inappropriate letter to Iran" at the height of the crisis in January, adding that this message contained "threats", although the Tehran diplomat carefully declined to cite the content.

"Let him say what he put in that letter", Zarif offered, cited by NBC News.
...
"The United States hit at the wrong place, at the wrong time, and these are the consequences and we can't control the consequences, nor can the United States. I mean, people are responsible for the consequences of their actions and I think people who initiated this, need to walk back", Zarif said, cited by NBC News.


Read More...
Bullseye

Is the Middle East's "axis of resistance" in a better or worse position post-Soleimani?

Elijah J. Magnier
ejmagnier.com
Sun, 16 Feb 2020 16:53 UTC
supporters iran syria iraq hamas
© Marziyah Mousavi/IRNABrothers
The Martyr Qassem Soleimani achieves even more than the Major General did

More than forty days ago a US drone assassinated Major General Qassem Soleimani, leader of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) - Quds Brigade and leader of the "Axis of the Resistance". He was killed after midnight at Baghdad airport between the second and the third of January along with his companions. Has the "Axis of Resistance" been weakened by this event, and what has it achieved since then?

On the Syrian front, in an outstanding gain, the Syrian Army along with its allies from the Zoul-fi-Qar brigade and other partners liberated the 432 km Damascus-Aleppo road for the first time since it was blocked in 2012. It enlarged the security perimeter on its western flank. The strategic cities of Saraqeb, Rashedeen, Khan al-Asal have been liberated along with El-Eiss hil, a location that Major General Soleimani always wanted to free. Hezbollah lost 23 officers buried at the hill and wants to recover them to bring them back home.

Comment: Is the U.S., in all its arrogant, decades-long meddling, finally to reap the whirlwind?

Read More...
Dominoes

The Philippines want the US out, and they're not alone

Tim Kirby
Strategic Culture
Sun, 16 Feb 2020 11:31 UTC
maga hat sea
© Strategic Culture FoundationStrategic Culture Foundation
The pawns of the Grand Chessboard are starting to move much more boldly - in an unpredicted by the punditry decision the Philippines have asked U.S. forces to leave their islands indefinitely. It was impossible to think even 10 or 15 years ago that a country as completely militarily helpless as the Philippines would dare to stand up to Uncle Sam, but now this has become a reality. In a microcosm this move could be blamed on Duterte's fiery personal character, or as some sort of fluke, but this is a growing trend that will probably continue for at least the next few years, in which ideology actually plays a major unseen role.

The Philippines are a poor troubled island nation that is starting to get its house in order thanks mostly to a powerful charismatic central figure, but if we look at the country through the lens of "Geopolitics 101" then we can see that this nation has more value than one would think due to its location.

Comment: See also:

Read More...
Calculator

US 'defense' budget soars, driving world military spending to 10-year high

Lucie Béraud-Sudreau
IISS - Military Balance Blog
Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:00 UTC
Defence
Figure 1. Defence spending: top 15 in 2019 US$bn
In 2019, the United States remained by far the world's largest defence spender, widening the gap between it and the second largest spender, China. US investments in weapons procurement and R&D alone were larger than China's total defence budget. The United States' defence investments in weapons procurement and R&D were also worth around four times as much as European states' combined.

IISS data shows that in 2019 the United States, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia and India retained their positions as the world's top defence spenders. Indeed, the only movement in the top 15 saw Italy and Australia swap places, with Italy taking the 12th position and Australia the 13th (Figure 1).

The lack of change in the top 15 reflects an interesting underlying trend, in that the US has if anything just restated its spending dominance. In 2019, global defence spending rose by 4.0% in real terms over 2018 figures, but spending in the US grew by 6.6%. China's spending also rose by 6.6% over 2018 data, but the trajectory of the two states' defence spending is diverging. The budget increase in the US was the largest in ten years, and spending has increased year-on-year since US President Donald Trump took office. While spending is still rising in China, the pace of growth is decelerating, in line with Beijing's relative economic slowdown. This divergence in trajectories means that the spending gap between the two countries, which had narrowed since 2010, has since 2018 increased once more (Figure 2). It remains to be seen, however, if this trend will continue given Washington's plans for a more limited defence-spending increase in FY2021.

Comment: Meanwhile the US' output is increasingly riddled with flaws, and its position on the world stage becomes ever weaker:

Read More...
Arrow Up

HS2: UK in talks with China over construction of high-speed railway


BBC
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 12:00 UTC
HS2 rail high speed
Artists rendition of HS2
The UK and China have held "preliminary discussions" over giving Beijing's state-owned railway firm a role in building the HS2 high-speed rail line.

However, government officials said no "concrete commitments" had been made.

China's state railway company said it could build the line in just five years and at a much lower cost, according to a letter seen by Building magazine.

But Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat warned letting CRCC build HS2 would be "extremely questionable".

It comes after Boris Johnson this week approved the controversial HS2 scheme.

This was despite an official review warning costs could reach over £100bn, against a budget of £62bn.

Comment: The UK is going to need a lot more than merely a high speed rail line to turn around its current trajectory. But, as it is, it could do a lot worse than work together with China to improve it's infrastructure:

Read More...
Apple Red

Woman threw apple at Netanyahu during election conference - Reports


Sputnik
Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:38 UTC
netanyahu
© REUTERS / NIR ELIAS
During an election conference in Israel, a woman threw an apple at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to the Israeli Channel 13.

The incident happened during an election conference held by the Prime Minister in Netanya.

According to reports, the 25-year-old woman who tossed the apple may have been aiming for Netanya's mayor, Miriam Feirberg, who was also present at the campaign.
Read More...
Nuke

US holding off on new START extension, hoping to bring China into deal


RFE/RL
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:36 UTC
obama medvedev
© AFPU.S. President Barack Obama (right) toasts with Czech counterpart Vaclav Klaus and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev (right) after signing the New START accord in Prague in 2010.
The U.S. administration has not decided whether to extend the historic New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) with Russia because it wants more time to persuade China to join the negotiations.

A senior administration official told reporters in a White House briefing on February 14 that Beijing's silence on the matter raises questions about its intentions and will force the United States to strengthen its military readiness to counter any potential threat.

The Trump administration has said it wants an extension of New START -- which is set to expire in February 2021 -- to include China. The United States and Russia are the two signatories of the treaty that went into effect in 2011.

China, the third-largest nuclear power, is on track to double its nuclear arsenal over the next decade. However, China's arsenal would still be less than half of that of the United States and Russia.

Beijing has not publicly expressed any interest in such talks.

"Continued silence from China creates uncertainty about their intentions and only brings about the need for a renewed focus on deterrence and military readiness for the United States," the U.S. administration official said.
Read More...
Info

CNN breaks 'report' of Syrian airstrikes ... from 2018 - but will anyone actually notice?


RT
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:30 UTC
cnn screenshot
A screenshot from CNN's 'World' page, February 15, 2020
CNN readers anxious to get updates on the Syrian war have been treated with a fresh report on the "regime's atrocities" citing the usual suspects... or it would only seem so, as the network reran a two-year-old story instead.

Citing the UK-based and rebel-linked Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the story claims that forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar Assad killed at least 71 people and injured 325 others in a series of airstrikes on rebel-held Eastern Ghouta. Published this week, the report is featured on CNN website's 'World' and 'Middle East' sections.

The only problem is that Ghouta has been under the control of Assad's government for nearly two years. Homes in the region are being rebuilt, not leveled by bombs.

In fact, CNN ran the same story, word for word, back in February 2018. The same paragraphs detailing the horrendous bombing appeared, along with a handy get-out-clause: "CNN could not independently verify the claim."


Comment: Two years later and looks like they still haven't verified it! Good job, CNN.


So why tell old news again? Did the network feel the need to remind its readers again which side they should take in Syria's eight-year civil war? Did its editors slip in an old story under the radar to bulk up its weekend coverage?

Comment: The crazy thing about the US is that its spooky managers can literally claim anything and most Americans will believe it.

Read More...
Chart Pie

Zelensky calls for Donbass elections in October


RFE/RL
Sat, 15 Feb 2020 21:25 UTC
Zelensky
© Paolo Pellegrin-Magnum Photos TIMEUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
Ukraine's president has called for holding local elections in the war-torn east, along with the rest of the country, in October, despite the ongoing conflict in the region.

Speaking on February 15 at the Munich Security Conference, Volodymyr Zelenskiy again made a plea for support from Western nations for help in Kyiv's fight against Russia-backed separatists.

"The war in Ukraine -- I know -- is a war in Europe. Together with the annexation of Crimea, it has already been going on for as long as World War II -- just imagine!" Zelenskiy said.

"Our wish today is to hold local elections throughout all the territories of Ukraine, including particular parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in October 2020," he said. "There is the same wish concerning the territory of Crimea as well."


Comment: The Donbass is doable - it's a condition of the Minsk Agreements, after all. But as for Crimea, no chance:
Pompeo's bombshell: 'Crimea is lost and will remain Russian' quotes Ukrainian news outlet. True?


"The people in Donbas need elections that will be recognized by Ukraine and the entire world as legitimate," he said. "And they cannot be such if they are not held in line with Ukrainian legislation, at the sound of gunfire, and without [Ukraine's] control of our border."
Read More...