OF THE
TIMES
"Unnamed US officials speak about their country's support of terrorist activities in third countries. In this case, they talk specifically about Russia.Published by NBC News on Monday, the report in question centered on allegations that Moscow had paid "bounties" to Taliban fighters who killed American troops in Afghanistan, a claim that first surfaced in a June New York Times story. However, buried in the article's 12th paragraph, an anonymous official, as is customary in US media, is cited as saying that US intelligence had assumed a "bounty program" existed, as it believed it was "a proportional response to the US arming of Ukrainian units fighting Russian forces in Crimea."
"If it is true... we then demand the US side to clarify whether or not Washington directly or indirectly has facilitated the SBU [Ukrainian security services] in organizing terrorist attacks against the people of Crimea."
"The thing is that we're being told about traces of Novichok on a bottle, but specialists say that, if there were actually traces of Novichok on the bottle, at least those who touched it or were standing nearby would have been exposed," Peskov said.It is absurd. Bryan MacDonald sums it up well:
"This goes against the conclusions drawn by experts. If there was a bottle, then why was it taken away? Perhaps someone has no interest in holding an investigation. There is too much in this story that is absurd, which keeps us from believing these statements without proof," he added.
When it comes to Russia, the mainstream Western media operates in a self-contained pit of rumor, fear, braggadocio, bulls**t, and propaganda. Thus its correspondents have treated the Navalny case in a predictable fashion: Any pronouncements from the opposition figure's associates, and the German government - even when contradictory or scarcely believable - are treated like gospel truth, but anything Russian officials say is immediately disparaged.Unknown, yet identifiable by nameless German military specialists. More malicious and deadly than all other novichoks, yet can't kill its target or harm other people handing the contaminated murder weapon. Who writes this BS?
Before Thursday, the most blatant example of this came on September 9, when, to quote Max Seddon, a Moscow correspondent for the Financial Times, "Germany apparently concluded (that) Navalny was poisoned with a substance 'that the world did not know until this attack, but which is more malicious and deadly than all known offshoots of the Novichok family,' and that Russian security must have done it."
Comment: Again Wray shows where his allegiance lies in ruling out that Antifa is anything less than a terror group. Why? Because Antifa's terror tactics are part of the larger (failing) strategy to oust Trump at all costs. Which Wray would seem to be on board with given the narratives he's feeding into.
Have a look: