The federal government shouldn't dictate what local schools across the country teach — and in the past, conservatives have rightly denounced the idea that it should. Here, for instance, is Phyllis Schlafly in 2014 railing against Obama-era Common Core standards, which Schlafly saw as an "attempt to compel all U.S. children to be taught the same material and not taught other things parents might think important." Yet like so many other conservative principles, this one seems to have fallen by the wayside in the Trump era. Now, President Donald Trump is announcing plans for (yet another!) executive order, this one to create a "patriotic education" curriculum for U.S. public schools.

Not only is Trump's plan an attempt to impose curriculum on local school districts across the country with merely the president's pen and phone [Obama's claim and actions], but that curriculum sounds like the sort of propaganda we've come to expect from authoritarian regimes.

If Trump's announcement speech is any indication, the kind of "patriotism" the president has in mind comes with a hefty dose of MAGA rhetoric about the "anti-American" left trying to indoctrinate small children with "Marxist doctrine holding that America is a wicked and racist nation."

There's of course nothing wrong with honoring America's roots and teaching children about all the beautiful and positive things in American history. (And we currently do just that!) There's also nothing wrong with teaching the children the truth about all the ugliness in American history too. A good education should — in age-appropriate ways — encompass both.

Many schools fall short of this ideal at present. One way to ensure that gets even worse is to have whoever is in power in Washington — be that Trump, or Joe Biden, or some future unknown leader — setting an American history curriculum for every single student in every public school district across the country. Whoever is in charge, that's a recipe for a biased and propagandistic version of history.

Can individual states, cities, or school districts do much better? Some will, some won't — but the beauty of a decentralized system is that 1) it's easier for parents and teachers to change the bad parts of a local curriculum than it is a national one, and 2) it leaves room for parents to pull their children out of schools that don't do well at this, or at something else, and enroll them a school that does better.

Ultimately, the best antidote for politicized lessons and public-school propaganda is school choice. When parents can choose between a range of local education options — traditional public schools, traditional private schools, charter schools, online schools, small-group-based "education pods," homeschooling, etc. — we leave fewer kids trapped in schools whose values don't align with their families and communities — and less room for whoever is in the White House to try to set everyone's lessons from on high.

• Will failed presidential hopeful Tikhanovskaya become Belarus's Juan Guaido? Exiled candidate meets Mike Pompeo's deputy
• Belarusian opposition leader Tikhanovskaya is cozying up to Washington, a serious strategic blunder
• Belarusian Guaido! Lithuania recognizes exiled Tikhanovskaya as 'elected leader' of Belarus