Puppet MastersS


Bad Guys

How can anyone be so bloody stupid as to commit state murder?

trump  Soleimani
General Qasem Soleimani and President Donald Trump
Did World War Three begin last Thursday night? I fear it may have done. Forgive my language, but on this occasion I think it justified. How can anyone possibly have been so bloody stupid? We know from history that assassinations can have limitless effects. And when the President of the United States orders the state murder (for this, alas, is what it was) of an Iranian general, it is hard to see a good end.

There will be retaliation. Other countries will be drawn in. Our own ability to make moral objections to such acts is gravely weakened because Donald Trump's action lies miles outside the laws of civilised war. Iran has no long-range drones (as far as we know) but can you begin to imagine the justified rage in the USA if a senior American general was shot dead on the steps of the Pentagon by an Iranian hit team? Yet what, in the end, would be the moral difference between the two acts?

Comment: Hitchens brings up many valid points, though he occasionally descends into fearmongering. But as political analyst Joe Quinn points out, this may have been a 'lesser of two evils" choice on Trump's part. Realpolitik still holds.

What War Was Trump Trying to Stop by Killing Iranian General Soleimani?
Recently released diplomatic cables dating from 2014-15 detail the extent of Iran's influence inside the Iraqi government, showing how Iranian intelligence officers have co-opted much of the Iraqi government's cabinet, infiltrated its military leadership, and even tapped into a network of sources once run by the CIA. In the 4-5 years since then, Iranian influence has only grown and, from an Israeli perspective, reached a 'red line' point where Iraq could be used as a staging ground for attacks on Israel.

Given this, and Trump's talk of there being "less and less reason" for the US to remain in the Middle East combined with the upcoming Iraqi parliament vote to officially demand the removal of US forces from the country, it's likely that the killing of Soleimani was a negotiated (by Trump) alternative to a relatively imminent, large-scale Israeli attack on Iranian assets in Iraq, and possibly Iran itself. Such an attack would have sparked a real war between Israel and Iran, which would inevitably have drawn in the US. This is, I propose, what Trump meant when he said that "we took action last night to stop a war."

In this scenario, public statements made by Trump administration officials that killing Soleimani was necessary to stop "significant strikes against Americans" in the region can be understood as necessary lies to cover up the truth: that rather than protecting its own immediate interests, the US government was acting to prevent Israel from doing something dangerously irrational that would threaten the lives of millions in the Middle East and beyond.

What US officials privately told their Iranian counterparts soon after the assassination fits this scenario. Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi, deputy commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, told Iranian state television that "the Americans resorted to diplomatic measures" the very next morning. Fadavi said Washington asked Tehran to respond "in proportion." They "even said that, if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did" which makes the entire situation seem like something of a sordid geopolitical game. This evening, rockets were fired at the US 'green zone' in Baghdad. Perhaps that is Tehran's proportionate response.



Black Cat

Erdogan announces Turkish troops start moving toward Libya

Turkey troops libya
© Associated PressTurkish troops reportedly readying for deployment to Libya
Turkey has begun deploying troops to Libya for "coordination and stability," President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said, revealing that Ankara will establish an operational center in the country.

The Turkish military has already started moving "slowly" towards Libya, Erdogan revealed late on Sunday. The scope of Ankara's involvement in the years-long conflict is still unknown.

Comment:


Magnify

Pence falsely links Iranian general to 9/11 attacks

Mike Pence
© Associated PressVice President Mike Pence in Iowa in October.
On Friday afternoon, Vice President Mike Pence took to Twitter to justify the targeted U.S. attack that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Suleimani.

But scholars say his tweets contain several inaccuracies, including an allegation that appeared to link Suleimani to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

In that tweet, Pence wrote that Suleimani "assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States."

Nuke

Iran rolls back 2015 nuclear deal claiming enrichment is based on technical needs

Arak reactor
© AFP/Iranian Atomic Energy OrganisationThe nuclear water reactor of Arak, south of capital Tehran
Tehran has removed the last constraints it agreed to impose on its nuclear program under the 2015 deal but said it is ready to return to fulfilling its obligations under the agreement if the US lifts sanctions.

Iran's nuclear program "no longer faces any operating restrictions," a government statement cited by Iranian media said, adding that parameters of enrichment capacity, enrichment level and the amount of enriched material would from now on be determined only by the program's "technical needs."

Tehran still vowed to continue its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and said that it could potentially return to fulfilling its obligations under the nuclear deal if sanctions imposed by Washington are lifted and Tehran's interests are respected.

The move marks the fifth and the final step in Tehran's gradual scaling down of its commitments under the deal. The measure was taken in response to America's unilateral exit from the agreement last year, which was followed by its reissuing of crippling sanctions against Iran.

X

Boris Johnson offers 'F***' response to US killing of Iranian general

BJohnson
© Reuters/Toby MelvilleUK Prime Minister Boris Johnson
The confrontation between Washington and Tehran has worsened following the US killing of a top Iranian general in a drone attack on Friday, 3 January, with the two sides exchanging inflammatory rhetoric and threats as European leaders scramble to defuse the situation.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly uttered the abrupt, four-letter response of "F***" when he was informed of US President Donald Trump 's drone attack near Baghdad International Airport that killed a top Iranian general, reports the Mirror.

The Prime Minister, who has been enjoying a luxury Caribbean island holiday with his girlfriend Carrie Symonds since Boxing Day, was informed of the killing of General Qassem Soleimani, who headed the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' elite Quds Force, over the phone on Friday, 3 December, as Britain was reportedly given no advance notice of the attack, which came to its attention only because British troops are stationed alongside US forces in Baghdad.

Comment: See also:
British Navy will escort UK-flagged ships through Strait of Hormuz


Mr. Potato

Random Guy stumbles again: Venezuelan opposition rejects Juan Guaido's leadership

Juan Guaido
© ReutersVenezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido speaks at Venezuela's National Assembly in Caracas, Venezuela December 17, 2019
The Venezuelan opposition stated on Sunday that they would not be seeking the reelection of the self-proclaimed president Juan Guaidó. According to their statement, the opposition is choosing to move forward without Guaido, as his corruption and failures have worsened their cause.

The parliamentarians declared themselves in revolt against Guaidó for having used the presidency of the parliament as a personal project to enrich himself.

"In 2019 that has just concluded, you were the hope of the country, today you are the biggest disappointment, you could be the future, but today you are and you will be the past, you were a dream turned into a nightmare, Juan Guaidó from today your time ended," the right-wing opposition deputy, José Brito, said this week.

Comment: It seems that upstart puppet Juan Guaido's story is coming to an end. Even the might of the US propaganda machine couldn't push him into office.


Arrow Up

Raising the stakes? US to hit 'actual decision-makers' of attacks on American targets with 'lawful strikes'

Pompeo
© YouTubeUS Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo
Washington has apparently decided to further raise the stakes in the already potentially explosive conflict with Iran, with Mike Pompeo saying the US will continue to target the "masterminds" plotting attacks against Americans.

The US will continue to "respond with lawful strikes" targeting "actual decision makers" if it perceives a danger to any American targets, the secretary of state said. The remarks came as he continued to defend the assassination of Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qassem Soleimani, which was ordered by President Donald Trump.

Pompeo maintained that Washington had "all the authority" to do what it had done, but added that the White House would keep Congress informed about developments in the Middle East from now on. His view on the "legality" of the American strikes on Iraqi soil was clearly not shared by Baghdad, which even filed a formal complaint over the incident with the UN secretary general and the UN Security Council.

He also argued that the killing of Soleimani, which sent shockwaves across both Iran and Iraq, with thousands of people hitting the streets to mourn the slain general and condemn the measures taken by the US, was still the best course of action.

Comment: A new phase and new threats, says Nasrallah:
The assassination of Qassem Soleimani has opened a new phase for the whole region, the leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, has said, calling for attacks on US soldiers and military assets.

Iraqi resistance will not let a single US soldier stay in Iraq after the killing of the Iranian Quds force commander, Nasrallah said in a televised speech on Sunday.
Nasrallah
© Unknown
The Hezbollah leader, however, warned against harming any American civilians, as such acts will only play into the hands of US President Donald Trump, adding that every US military asset and serviceman in the region is fair game.

"When the coffins of American soldiers and officers begin to be transported ... to the United States, Trump and his administration will realize that they have really lost the region and will lose the elections," Nasrallah said.

Expulsion of the US from the whole Middle East is a fair price for the murder of Soleimani and other officials, Nasrallah said, issuing a rather grim threat to the US military. The suicide bombers, who had forced America to leave before, are still there - and now they are greater in numbers, he added.

Avenging the deaths of Soleimani and other high-ranking Iranian and Iraqi military officials, including Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iraq's Popular Mobilization Force (PMF) militia, is the responsibility of not only Iran but of all its allies in the region. Nasrallah urged all the members of the so-called 'Resistance Axis' to make up their minds on how they will deal with the assassination.
Trumps new bloat and gloat
Facing promises of retaliation for the killing of a popular Iranian general whose death he ordered personally, Donald Trump threatened in no uncertain terms to escalate the conflict further. He said that if Tehran fails to turn the other cheek, the US will hit 52 Iranian sites of great value. Hours later, the US president returned to Twitter to brag about the amount of money the US military has received for equipment under his watch.


Stocks of US defense contractors rose in the wake of the killing as investors predicted that there will be no shortage of US taxpayers' money going their way if, as Trump threatened, their products are headed for Iran.


See also: Trump: US will strike 52 Iranian sites 'very fast and very hard' if Tehran moves to avenge general's death - UPDATE: Zarif responds


Attention

IRGC Commander vows Tehran's response to US will end its presence in the region

BrigGenSalami
© theiranproject.comIranian Brigadier General Hossein Salami
The Middle East, considered one of the most unstable regions in the world, was further plunged into an escalation of tensions following the killing of Qasem Soleimani, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander, early on Friday in a targeted airstrike ordered by US President Donald Trump.

IRGC Major General Hossein Salami has stated that "the assassination of martyred General Qasem Soleimani will be followed by a strategic revenge which will definitely put an end to the US presence in the region", according to Fars News.

Salami highlighted that Iran's response would come "in a vast geography throughout time and with determining impacts". In apparent effort to double down on his pledge, the commander suggested that his statement "should come in written, since everyone will see its realization."

Comment: Iranian Admiral: We'll force US Navy out of the Persian Gulf
US forces and allies will soon be forced out of the Persian Gulf waters, where they have been seeking to establish a foothold for years, says Iran's navy commander.

Rear Admiral Hossein Khanzadi said that in his view the United States has come to find itself with very little elbow room in the regional waters to advance its attempted objective of setting up a coalition to protect its interests. "We should force them out as soon as possible. God willing, this will happen and it is shaping up in various aspects already," said Khanzadi.

The interview was made before the US military conducted a vicious operation in Baghdad during the early hours of Friday, assassinating Lieutenant General Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC).

Khanzadi had said the United States had gone to considerable lengths to peel Russia and China away from the joint war games in the Sea of Oman and in the India Ocean in late December.

He said the presence of the US Navy and its allies, including the British, in the Persian Gulf is not a matter of concern to Iran.

"Each aircraft carrier dispatched to the region is deployed within 300 miles from the Iranian borders. Such massive equipment floats idly and this piles huge pressure on the Americans and the British," said Khanzadi. "Others do not wish to pay the cost for such a deceitful game. This is why no country is joining their coalition."
The unforgivable has been done and it has served not only to unite all of Iran, but the entire region. The US/UK are now in the crosshairs while Israel sits on the sidelines gloating.


Stock Down

Retaliation: Iran could cause an 'overnight economic depression' to the detriment of many countries

Riyadh stock exchange
© AFP/Fayez NureldineThe exchange board at the Stock Exchange Market (Tadawul) bourse in Riyadh.
Tehran could block a key shipping route in the Gulf region after US attack, thus causing a terrible headache to global oil markets and the world's economy in general, former Pentagon official Michael Maloof told RT's Boom Bust.

Crude prices rose on Friday - with both Brent and West Texas intermediate (WTI) gaining more than three percent - on the news of the US drone strike that killed Qassem Soleimani, the most powerful Iranian general and the commander of the Revolutionary Guards' elite Quds Force. However, that could be only the beginning of the economic consequences of the attack, according to Maloof.
"If the Iranians take retaliatory actions of some kind, let's say in the Persian Gulf or the Strait of Hormuz, basically blocking through mining or sinking ships...it will bring virtually overnight economic depression because 40 percent of the oil comes through there for other countries."
While the US could feel less impact in this case as it produces its own crude, China could be one of those countries "dramatically" hit by such a scenario, Maloof believes. However, Iran may also target oil refineries in Gulf countries, which house US personnel, to hit the Americans indirectly, the former Pentagon official added.

Comment: Financial repercussions from the US attack are having a negative rippling effect - boding a major miscalculation in the making and a costly price to pay. Onus USA.


Fallout: US-Iran tensions affect US and ME stock markets
Saudi Arabia's Tadawul All Share Index (TASI) as well as other key Middle East stock exchanges were down on Sunday after the killing of Iran's top general triggered a new round of tensions between the US and Iran.

The TASI slumped around 2 percent and was below 8,230 points on Sunday morning. Shares of energy giant Saudi Aramco fell to the lowest level since its record IPO last month, trading at 34.55 riyals per share.

Other key equity markets in the region also fell sharply. The major stocks of the Dubai Financial Market were down more than three percent after losing nearly 85 points, while the Qatar Exchange Index slid nearly 2.1 percent and shares included in Kuwait's premier index fell more than four percent. The overall index of the 30 most highly capitalized and liquid stocks traded on the Egyptian Exchange also slumped, falling nearly 2.5 percent.

The drop comes as Washington and Tehran continued to exchange threats on Sunday.

Earlier, the US stock market was shaken by the consequences of the attack, finishing the first trading days of 2020 with the biggest losses in a month. On Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 233.92 points or 0.8 percent, while the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite fell more than 0.7 percent and nearly 0.8 percent respectively.



Star of David

Israel set to steal more millions of Palestinian money

Palestinian barbed wire
© AFPPalestinian protesters at the Israel-Gaza border, December 27, 2019
Israeli Security Cabinet on Sunday approved stealing more than $43 million of tax funds from Palestinians, claiming the money has been used to promote violence.

The sum, Israel claims, [is what] the Palestinians used to pay the families of Palestinians who have been jailed or killed by Israel. Palestinian officials say the payments are needed to help vulnerable families who have been affected by Israeli occupation.

Under past agreements, Israel collects customs and other taxes on behalf of the Palestinians and transfers the money to the Palestinian Authority. These monthly transfers, about $170 million, are a key source of funding for the budget of the authority, which administers parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Jerusalem.

Israel last year passed a law deducting parts of these transfers that it said were supporting martyrs' families. Sunday's decision was a continuation of that policy.