Puppet MastersS


Document

'It's going to be staggering': Jeffrey Epstein associates prepare for worst in imminent document dump

Jeffrey Epstein
© Corbis/Getty ImagesSex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein
As the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to unfold, a laundry list of celebrities, business magnates and socialites who have flown anywhere near the registered sex offender's orbit are now tainted with pedo-polonium. Many of them, such as Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak, and Victoria's Secret boss Les Wexner have sought to distance themselves from Epstein and his activities - however their attempts have fallen on deaf ears considering their extensive ties to the pedophile.

As Vanity Fair's Gabriel Sherman notes, "The questions about Epstein are metastasizing much faster than they can be answered: Who knew what about Epstein's alleged abuse? How, and from whom, did Epstein get his supposed $500 million fortune? Why did Acosta grant Epstein an outrageously lenient non-prosecution agreement? (And what does it mean that Acosta was reportedly told Epstein "belonged to intelligence"?)"

Also illuminating is a statement by attorney Brad Edwards, who said during a Wednesday press conference seated next to Epstein accuser Courtney Wild that "There were other business associates of Mr. Epstein's who engaged in improper sexual misconduct at one or more of his homes. We do know that," adding "In due time the names are going to start coming out."

Comment: See also:


Better Earth

The West freaks out over 'Frankenstein' China while New Silk Road is already decades ahead

frankenstein
© iStockWestern intellectuals freak over 'Frankenstein' China.

Academics in Beijing plot decoupling business with the US and teaming up with EU and ASEAN
Western economists and intellectuals obsessed with demonization of China are never shy of shortcuts glaringly exposing their ignorance. The latest outburst posits that "we" - as in Western intellectuals - "are the modern version of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein," who electro-shocked a dead body (China) into a resurrected "murderous monster."

So, welcome to the Sino-Frankenstein school of international relations. What next? A black and white remake with Xi Jinping playing the monster? Anyway, "we" - as in mankind's best hope - should "avoid carrying on in the role of Frankenstein."

The author is an economics professor emeritus at Harvard. He cannot even identify who's to blame for Frankenstein - the West or the Chinese. That says much about Harvard's academic standards.

Now, compare this with what was being discussed at a trade war symposium at Renmin University in Beijing this past Saturday.

Comment: Pepe Escobar shares on Facebook a few ways of how China is divesting itself of the dollar:
THE NEW SILK ROADS AND THE US DOLLAR

Will China build up the vast New Silk Roads/Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with US dollars?

Michael Hudson has the answer:

"No, they are getting rid of dollars. They already are receiving such a large surplus each year that they only use the dollars to buy gold or some goods, such as Boeing airplanes, but mostly food and raw materials. When China buys iron from Australia, for instance, they sell dollars from their foreign-exchange reserves and buy Australian currency to pay Australians for the iron ore that they import. They use dollars to pay other countries that are still part of the dollar area and still willing to keep adding these dollars to their official monetary reserves instead of holding gold."
See also:


Bullseye

Ilhan Omar has introduced a resolution affirming that Americans have the right to boycott Israel

Ilhan Omar
© WikimediaIlhan Omar
Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar has introduced a bill affirming that Americans have the right to participate in boycotts. Although the legislation doesn't specifically mention the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS), it coincides with an anti-BDS resolution that is currently being pushed by many Democrats.

House Resolution 496 (HRes496) asserts that boycotts "have been effectively used in the United States by advocates for equal rights since the Boston Tea Party and include boycotts led by civil rights activists during the 1950s and 1960s in order to advocate for racial equality, such as the Montgomery bus boycott, and promote workers' rights, such as the United Farm Workers-led boycott of table grapes." It also identifies historical moments when Americans participated in boycotts to push human rights in other countries: the boycotting of Imperial Japan during the late 1930s, the boycotting of Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1941, the boycotting of the 1980 summer Olympics in Moscow, and the boycotting of South Africa. The text of the bill also takes aim at legislative efforts to prohibit boycotts urging, "Congress, States, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing anti-boycott resolutions and legislation."

Arrow Up

US complains about Iran's missiles yet the influx of American weapons is "making our region ready to explode" - Iranian FM

Zarif
© Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty ImagesIran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif speaks during a press conference in Tehran on June 10, 2019.
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said Monday that if President Donald Trump truly wants to engage in good-faith negotiations over Iran's ballistic missile program, his administration must stop selling tens of billions of dollars in weapons to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and other U.S. allies in the Middle East.

Zarif, who is in New York on United Nations business, told NBC's Lester Holt that the influx of American weapons is "making our region ready to explode."

"If you want to discuss ballistic missiles, then we need to discuss the amount of weapons that are sold to our region," said Zarif. "Last year, Iran spent $16 billion altogether on its military. We have a 82 million population... The United Arab Emirates, with a million population, spent $22 billion. Saudi Arabia — with less than half of our population — spent $67 billion, most of them are American [arms]."

Comment: RFE/RL reports that Trump is claiming a lot of progress has been made, despite denials from Tehran:
U.S. President Donald Trump says "a lot of progress" has been made toward ending a tense standoff with Iran, even as tough language continues to be exchanged between the two sides.

"A lot of progress has been made. We'll see what happens. But a lot of progress has been made," Trump told a cabinet meeting on July 16, referring to Washington's efforts to persuade Tehran to negotiate over its missile program.

Trump's remarks echoed those made by his secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, who told the cabinet that Iran had signaled a readiness to negotiate with Washington on the matter.

"The Iranian regime is struggling to figure out what they're going to do with their economy because we've been terribly effective," Pompeo said.

"And the result is...frankly, I think it was yesterday, maybe the day before, for the first time the Iranians have said that they're prepared to negotiate about their missile program. So we will have this opportunity, I hope, if we continue to execute our strategy appropriately, we'll have this opportunity to negotiate a deal that will actually prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon."


Iran has been at the negotiating table from the very beginning, it's the US that has been intent on sabotaging any agreements.


Pompeo appeared to be referring to comments by Iran's foreign minister in an interview with U.S. television on July 15. Mohammad Javad Zarif, who was in New York for a UN conference, told NBC News that Shi'ite-led Iran would discuss its missile program only after Washington stopped arming Sunni Arab states Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which are bitter regional rivals of Iran.

However, Alireza Miryousefi, a spokesman for Iran's mission at the United Nations, wrote on Twitter, "Iran's missiles...are absolutely and under no condition negotiable with anyone or any country, period."

"We categorically reject the...characterization of [Zarif's] comments to NBC News that 'if the U.S. wants to talk about missiles, it should stop selling weapons, including missiles, to regional states' as meaning that Iran is willing to negotiate on its defensive missiles," he wrote.


Tensions have surged between Washington and Tehran since the United States last year withdrew from a 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran and reimposed sanctions after the U.S. administration said the deal would enable Tehran to produce a nuclear weapon in a few years. The sanctions have devastated the Iranian economy.

Trump and other U.S. officials have said Iran's continued testing of ballistic missiles violates the spirit of the accord, claiming the technology can be used to develop nuclear weapons. Iran says its missile program is strictly for defensive purposes and that its nuclear program is for civilian use.

"They can't have a nuclear weapon," Trump told the cabinet meeting. "We want to help them. We'll be good to them, we'll work with them. We'll help them in any way we can, but they can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not looking, by the way, for regime change."

"They [also] can't be testing ballistic missiles," he added.

Iran has announced breaches of the 2015 nuclear accord and said that more will follow if Europe does not help the country overcome the damaging effects of U.S. sanctions.

Iran has said the breaches could be reversed if Washington returned to the deal, even as it accused Washington of waging "economic war."

"Western governments' major vice is their arrogance," said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"If the country opposing them is a weak one, their arrogance works. But if it's a country that knows and stands up against them, they will be defeated."
The US is having to reconsider its position on Iran because starvation sanctions, intimidation and false flags, for now, don't appear to be working:


Arrow Up

Duterte defies UN human rights panel, says he'll 'only face a trial in a Philippine court'

mural of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte
© REUTERS/Romeo RanocoA mural of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte overlooks prisoners inside the Manila City Jail, October 16, 2017. It reads: "Steer away from illegal drugs to save your life and in turn, will save the country's."
Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has defiantly refused to cooperate with a UN human rights tribunal, saying that if he is ever to be put on trial over his 'War on Drugs', it would have to be in the Philippines.

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) adopted a resolution last Thursday to investigate alleged human rights abuses by Duterte's government as part of Manila's 'War on Drugs.' The measure was introduced to the 48-member international body by Iceland, prompting Duterte to consider severing ties with the Nordic nation.

In an interview with Philippines pastor Apollo Quiboloy on Wednesday, Duterte said that he would never recognize the UN organization's authority.

Bullseye

Big Tech is taking a beating by both sides in Washington

Matt Perault
© Andrew Harrer/BloombergFrom left, Facebook's Matt Perault, Amazon's Nate Sutton, and Apple's Kyle Andeer, swear in to a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust hearing in Washington, D.C., on July 16.
Facebook, Google and Amazon grappled with multiple attacks across Washington from lawmakers and President Donald Trump over a range of grievances that underscored the kind of reckoning the companies could face.

House Democrats on Tuesday grilled Amazon.com Inc. over perceived conflicts of interest on its platform, while senators from both parties slammed Facebook Inc. over its plan to introduce a cryptocurrency, saying the company can't be trusted. Alphabet Inc.'s Google got broadsides from Senate Republicans who complained of anti-conservative bias and from Trump, who said he wants the Justice Department to look into its work in China.

The pressure isn't going away. Facebook Vice President David Marcus is facing another day of testimony Wednesday answering questions about its Libra cyrptocurrency project from the House Committee on Financial Services. Panel chairwoman Maxine Waters has called on the company to stop the project while Congress investigates.

David Marcus
© Andrew Harrer/BloombergDavid Marcus speaks during a hearing in Washington, D.C., on July 16.

Comment: See also:


Roses

5 years on since MH17 was shot down, killing 298 people: Nobody has yet been held officially responsible

MH17 Memorial at AMS
© Roman Boed/Wikipedia CommonsA makeshift memorial at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, Netherlands for victims of flight MH17.
On July 17, 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by a missile over eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board and spawning an ongoing political battle.

The aircraft, a Boeing 777, was traveling between Amsterdam and Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, when it was shot out of the sky by a Russian-made missile over Donetsk, a territory controlled by pro-Russian separatists who want to take the region out of Ukraine.

It took almost five years for anyone to be formally accused of the attack, and the suspects have not been apprehended.

The incident only increased tensions between Ukraine and Russia, with each nation repeatedly contradicting the other's account. As Kiev and Moscow squabble, families continue to call for justice, and criticism that the US hasn't stood up to Russia over the incident remains.

Comment:



Chess

Flashback Best of the Web: The political forces that led to the shootdown of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17

MH17
© Reuters/ Maxim Zmeyev
Four years ago, on 17 July 2014, in the midst of a civil war raging in eastern Ukraine, Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 was destroyed with all 298 passengers and crew. On 25 May last, the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) entrusted with the criminal investigation of the downing and composed of the Netherlands, Australia, Belgium, Malaysia and paradoxically, given its possible involvement, Ukraine, presented its second progress report. Like the first report in September 2016, it took the form of a press conference, with video animations supporting the investigation's findings. This time there was even less to report; the main conclusion was that elements from the Russian 53rd Buk missile brigade were the culprits, a claim already made by the London-based investigative group Bellingcat two years before. In February 2016 that assertion had still been dismissed as unfit for evidence by the Dutch chief prosecutor on the JIT, Fred Westerbeke, in a letter to victims' relatives. How can it possibly have become the core component of the case for the prosecution two years and two months later?

The JIT press conference was immediately followed by a formal declaration on the part of the Dutch and Australian governments that held Russia responsible. However, JIT member Malaysia dissociated itself from the accusation, whilst Belgium has remained silent. The obviously over-hasty conclusion, on the heels of the alleged Skripal nerve gas incident in Salisbury and the likewise contested Syrian government gas attack on jihadist positions in Douma, all point in the same direction: Putin's Russia must be kept under fire and there is no time to wait for a court verdict.

Airplane

SOTT Focus: 'Call for Justice' - Investigative Report on Gaping Holes in The Official Story of MH17

MH17 amsterdam
Five years on from the MH17 terror attack, an investigative team from Bonanza Media has published the following half-hour video report comprising footage from exclusive interviews they've conducted in the intervening years with - among others - one of the suspects in the downing of MH17, the Malaysian prime minister and a Malaysian colonel who recovered black boxes from the crash site.

Their report includes testimony from eyewitnesses, evidence from experts, and footage of large sections of the downed plane still lying around in eastern Ukraine, leaving viewers with no doubt that the official JIT investigation is incomplete at best, corrupt at worst...


Star of David

Israelis getting twitchy as former prime minister's ties with Epstein get attention

Killary and then Defense Minister Ehud Barak
© ReutersEhud Barak and Hillary Clinton
Jeffrey Epstein's arrest is reverberating in Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing Likud party are calling for a criminal probe into former prime minister Ehud Barak's personal and business ties with the accused sex trafficker, Israeli media is reporting.

Barak, 77, served as prime minister from 1999 to 2001. This month he formed a new party to run for prime minister against Netanyahu, who called for new elections in September. Once political allies, Barak and Netanyahu have been sparring on social media, with Netanyahu producing a video raising Barak's relationship to the multimillionaire New York financier, and Ohio billionaire Les Wexner, who has given money to Barak, the Times of Israel reported.

Barak was a close friend and business partner with Epstein for years. Now some of those business partnerships are being scrutinized amid questions about Barak's own source of wealth. The Times reported Saturday that Barak is exploring whether to sever business ties with Epstein, 66, who was charged last week with sex trafficking underage girls.

In 2015, Barak formed a limited partnership company in Israel to invest in a high-tech startup called Reporty, now named Carbyne., which develops video streaming and geolocation software for emergency services, the Times reported. A large part of the investment money was supplied by Epstein.

Barak also received $2.5 million from the Wexner Foundation in 2004 for research, which has never been fully explained, Haaretz reported. Epstein was a member of that foundation.

Comment: Pure political opportunism by Netanyahu here. But that doesn't mean he's wrong. From the Daily Mail:
EXCLUSIVE: Married Israeli politician Ehud Barak is seen hiding his face entering Jeffrey Epstein's NYC townhouse as bevy of young beauties were also spotted going into mansion - despite his claim he NEVER socialized with the pedophile and his girls