Puppet MastersS


Pyramid

SOTT Focus: 'Bipartisan' Washington Insiders Reveal Their Plan For Chaos If Trump Wins The Election

Trump and Congress
A group of "bipartisan" neoconservative Republicans and establishment Democrats have been "simulating" multiple catastrophic scenarios for the 2020 election, including a simulation where a clear victory by the incumbent provokes "unprecedented" measures, which the Biden campaign could take to foil a new Trump inauguration.

A group of Democratic Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as a cadre of "Never Trump" neoconservative Republicans have spent the past few months conducting simulations and "war games" regarding different 2020 election "doomsday" scenarios.

Per several media reports on the group, called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office, potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis. However, according to TIP's own documents, even their simulations involving a "clear win" for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.

Comment: You didn't think this maniacal, power-hungry cabal would leave Russia out of the US presidential election narrative, did you?
The Hill writes (emphasis added):
Russian media and other groups are intentionally "amplifying" concerns around mail-in voting in order to undermine the 2020 U.S. elections, a report compiled by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) made public Thursday found.
...
"Russian state media, proxies, and Russian-controlled social media trolls are likely to promote allegations of corruption, system failure, and foreign malign interference to sow distrust in democratic institutions and election outcomes," the Office of Intelligence and Analysis wrote.
Do these DHS folks ever look into mirrors?

And what exactly are the Washington Post and New York Times pieces below doing but "to sow distrust in democratic institutions and election outcomes"?

What's the worst that could happen?
The election will likely spark violence — and a constitutional crisis

What Will You Do if Trump Doesn't Leave?
Playing out the nightmare scenario.



Arrow Up

Trump bans 'divisive, anti-American' diversity training

trump
© EPAThe president has previously said he does not believe the US has a systemic racism problem
US President Donald Trump has ordered federal agencies to stop racial sensitivity training, labelling it "divisive, anti-American propaganda".

A memo to government agencies says it has come to his attention that millions of dollars of taxpayers' money have funded such "trainings".

The document says these sessions only foster resentment in the workforce.

Mr Trump has previously said he does not believe systemic racism is a problem in the US.

Comment: Yet another corrupt and divisive tax-payer funded program that Trump has rightly pulled funding from:


Alarm Clock

Did Trump's commitment to federalism just win him the election?

trump twitter
© Donald Trump/Twitter
For months we've been told that President Trump has trailed Democrat Joe Biden in the opinion polls. His odds of winning were vanishingly small.

From the moment the George Floyd protests turned into violent riots Trump refused the call of conservative pundits like Mike Cernovich and Ann Coulter to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1878 in Minneapolis.

They were wrong to jump the gun. Trump was being goaded into acting like a dictator which the Democrats would have pounced on him for. It was too early in the cycle.

He had to, politically, take a punch in the mouth and allow things to get out of hand. There was no good decision for him back in May.

Bomb

Small crowds, little enthusiasm: Biden bombs in historically Democrat Kenosha after 'desperation trip'

joe biden airport
Biden leaves his basement for a belated PR trip to Kenosha after the riots and killings.
There was no crowd of supporters to greet Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at the airport when he arrived in the battleground state of Wisconsin, Thursday, and as of 1:00 p.m., no crowd (other than his MSM supporters) had formed on the streets or in front of the Kenosha church where he was expected at 2:00 p.m. to hold a community event.


Comment: Compare this debacle to Trump's latest campaign crowds. Even a fake pandemic doesn't dim his base's enthusiasm:

New Hampshire airport arrival August 28:
trump rally new hampshire airport august 2020
© Rightside BroadcastingTrump arrival for New Hampshire rally
Mt. Rushmore July 4:
trump july 4 rushmore
© Anna Moneymaker for The New York TimesMore than 7,000 Trump supporters attended the July 4th event at Mt. Rushmore
Charlotte March 2:
trump rally charlotte march 2020
© Doug Mills/The New York TimesPresident Trump at a campaign rally in Charlotte, N.C., on March 2. Soon afterward, the coronavirus forced a halt to traditional campaign events.
Wildwood New Jersey, January 28:
trump rally new jersey january 2020
Trump rally in Wildwood, NJ, January 28, 2020



Attention

Biden's only chance to win rests on a false flag

joe biden
© REUTERS/Kevin LamarqueJoe Biden
The Black Revolution is in full swing in the U.S. Over the next sixty days we will be treated to the greatest political show on Earth as the Democrats and their handlers in The Davos Crowd pursue the biggest lie since Climate Change.

The events of 2020 are lining up for a climax to this story that ends with only one outcome, a contested election which fuels a coup attempt after the election results come in on November 3rd.

And because of this now obvious plan, setting up a false flag around the election is the most likely means to produce election results close enough to support this course of action.

I'm not the only one thinking in these terms at this point. Joaquin Flores, writing for Fort Russ, mused similarly last week. As the polls shift towards Donald Trump and the Democrats run around concocting fairy tales after allowing Joe Biden out of his gimp cellar long enough for people to see how far he has fallen mentally, I'm nearly convinced this is likely.

Headphones

Belarusian state TV releases recording of alleged Warsaw-Berlin call casting doubt on Germany's Navalny-Novichok narrative

navalny ambulance
The ambulance that transported Alexei Navalny to Charite Mitte Hospital Complex in Berlin, Germany August 22, 2020
Previously, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko claimed that his country had managed to intercept a call between Berlin and Warsaw, ostensibly proving that Chancellor Angela Merkel's claims about Navalny having been poisoned were a deliberate lie.

Belarusian state television has released a recording of a phone call regarding Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny that was allegedly made between German and Polish authorities and purportedly intercepted by Belarusian intelligence.

In the alleged recording, the two individuals, one of whom goes by the name "Nick" and the other by the name "Mike", discuss the documents on Navalny's "poisoning" that were about to be presented to Chancellor Angela Merkel's office. When an alleged Polish official asks if the poisoning was real, "Nick" says that this is not so important, adding that all methods are good in "war".

The callers went on to discuss how the scandal over Navalny's poisoning could be used to dissuade Russia's President Vladimir Putin from continuing his purported attempts to influence the situation in Belarus, which is currently experiencing protests. At the same time, one of the speakers said that his alleged work in Belarus was not yielding results that were as good as expected, calling the country's president, Alexander Lukashenko, a "tough nut to crack" who is surrounded by "loyal" officials and the military. Lukashenko has repeatedly said that the protests in his country are orchestrated and backed from abroad, condemning foreign interference in Belarus' domestic affairs.

The Belarusian broadcaster ONT said that the "recording" had been passed on to the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) for them to look into the contents.

X

Trump says he has seen no proof of Navalny poisoning, awaiting German findings

Trump/Navalny
© Getty Images/New York Times/thinkstock/Alexey Malgavko/Reuters/KJNUS President Donald Trump • Alexei Navalny
President Trump on Friday cast doubt on the consensus from Germany that leading Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny was poisoned in an assassination attempt in Siberia, saying he is waiting to review the evidence. Trump said during a briefing at the White House:
"We haven't had any proof yet. I would be very angry if that's the case, so we'll take a look at the numbers and the documents, because we're going to be sent a lot of documents over the next few days."
The president's remarks came hours after NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said there is "proof beyond doubt" that Navalny was poisoned with the Novichok nerve agent. The NATO head called it a violation of international law that required an international response.


Comment: See also:


House

The CDC is America's new landlord

CDC Headquarters
© Getty Images/BloombergCDC Headquarters, Atlanta, Georgia
This is astonishing, even by 2020 standards.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, operating under the US Department of Health and Human Services, has asserted jurisdiction over private residential leases nationwide. It intends to curtail evictions until at least the end of the year, and in fact its new directive threatens federal criminal penalties against landlords who ignore tenant "declarations" made using CDC forms.

It is unclear, to put it mildly, exactly how this jurisdiction over private contracts and state/local courts flows even to Congress, much less an administrative agency acting on its own. One federal official justifies the bizarre and legally dubious action based on the CDC's broad charter to stop the spread of communicable diseases — a charter at which they've failed miserably with covid:

Comment: And the plan just marches on: Eliminate the working class for the benefit of the few.


Attention

Novichok, Navalny, Nordstream, Nonsense

Bundesnachrichtendienst/novichok
© picture-alliancde/dpa/M. Kappeler/Sky News/KJNBundesnachrichtendienst
Once Navalny was in Berlin it was only a matter of time before it was declared that he was poisoned with Novichok. The Russophobes are delighted. This of course eliminates all vestiges of doubt about what happened to the Skripals, and proves that Russia must be isolated and sanctioned to death and we must spend untold billions on weapons and security services. We must also increase domestic surveillance, crack down on dissenting online opinion. It also proves that Donald Trump is a Russian puppet and Brexit is a Russian plot.

I am going to prove beyond all doubt that I am a Russian troll by asking the question Cui Bono?, brilliantly identified by the Integrity Initiative's Ben Nimmo as a sure sign of Russian influence.

I should state that I have no difficulty at all with the notion that a powerful oligarch or an organ of the Russian state may have tried to assassinate Navalny. He is a minor irritant, rather more famous here than in Russia, but not being a major threat does not protect you against political assassination in Russia.

What I do have difficulty with is the notion that if Putin, or other very powerful Russian actors, wanted Navalny dead, and had attacked him while he was in Siberia, he would not be alive in Germany today. If Putin wanted him dead, he would be dead.

Comment: A '4N' view of the Navalny mystery, Murray connects the obvious dots in context of a bigger picture. Is he right?

See also:
German military toxicologists claim to have found traces of Novichok in Russian opposition figure Navalny's blood, urine & skin - Der Spiegel


Vader

Let's not fall into the empire's trap

rioter/fire
© Reuters/Stephen MaturenKenosha, Wisconsin, August 24, 2020
I'm sorry, those who know me know that I'm strongly anti-racist and have previously written (positively) about the American Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, but things that have happened in the last two years have dramatically changed the perspective.

It is obvious that the United States is a racist country, but what is happening today is unfortunately not a genuinely popular revolt but rather a manipulation of events to resolve the current power conflict within the American elite.

I am sure that neither Malcolm X nor Martin Luther King would have supported this kind of protest, not because they would accept at all the discrimination and violence against blacks and minorities in the United States, but because the protests are developing in a sectarian sense to divide the impoverished population of the United States and provoke a civil war.

This is not what those two great leaders wanted.

Comment: Sorry, some are not that smart when it comes to 'chaos for hire'.