Puppet MastersS

Stock Down

Deep State eating itself? Zuckerberg Loses $7 Billion as Firms Boycott Facebook Ads

Mark Zuckerberg
© George Frey/BloombergMark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg just became $7.2 billion poorer after a flurry of companies pulled advertising from Facebook Inc.'s network.

Shares of the social media company fell 8.3% on Friday, the most in three months, after Unilever, one of the world's largest advertisers, joined other brands in boycotting ads on the social network. Unilever said it would stop spending money with Facebook's properties this year.

The share-price drop eliminated $56 billion from Facebook's market value and pushed Zuckerberg's net worth down to $82.3 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. That also moved the Facebook chief executive officer down one notch to fourth place, overtaken by Louis Vuitton boss Bernard Arnault, who was elevated to one of the world's three richest people along with Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates.

Comment: See also:


Eye 1

Total lockdown extended following increased coronavirus testing in Leicester, UK

Leicester
866 coronavirus cases were reported in Leicester in the last two weeks
The current lockdown measures should remain in force in Leicester for an extra two weeks, it has been recommended, while coronavirus restrictions are eased across the rest of England from this Saturday.

But a parliamentary statement on the city's fate, to be made by Health Secretary Matt Hancock, was due at 5pm and has been delayed until shortly after 9pm this evening. It is not known why.

The city's mayor Sir Peter Soulsby had said he received a report by email just after 1am today detailing the suggestions which he said were unjustified and had been "hastily cobbled together".

Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

The toppling of Eliot Engel: Israel-firster is defeated in congressional primary

Eliot Engel
© ny1.comNY Congressman Eliot Engel
Sometimes listening to the morning news on television is a bit like entering into an alternate universe. Last Wednesday, the day after primary elections in New York State, CBS News reported that New York Congressman Eliot Engel was "facing a challenge" from Democratic Party challenger Jamaal Bowman. NBC News reported that Engel was "trailing." The reality, according to the New York Times tally of the results that morning was that Bowman had beaten Engel by a margin to 60.9% versus 35.6% with more than 82% of votes counted. Even though it posted the numbers, the Times felt compelled to describe the apparently impending lopsided loss as if it were something less than that, as a "stiff challenge" for Engel.

The media deference to Engel derives from the fact that he is a protected species, possibly the leading Israel-firster in Congress. In 2003, Engel supported the invasion of Iraq and in the following year he organized a group of fellow congressmen to demand cuts in the U.S. contribution to the United Nations office that assists Palestinian refugees. He attended the infamous Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu address to Congress in 2015 that many other Democratic lawmakers boycotted due to the insult to President Obama and afterwards called Netanyahu's speech "compelling."

Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Andrew Cuomo and Nancy Pelosi all had endorsed Engel, who has been in Congress for going on 32 years and currently heads the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Clinton explained that Engel "...is deeply committed to working with our allies to maintain American leadership on the global stage." She was, of course, referring to Israel.

Che Guevara

Three recent signs the Democrats want a 'socialist' revolution

Scott/Pelosi/Schumer
© Getty Images/Chip SomodevillaSenator Tim Scott โ€ข Speaker Nancy Pelosi โ€ข Senator Chuck Schumer
Three events last week showed that Democrats do not want a mere transfer of power if they win the November election: they intend to revolutionize our entire system of government.

The first happened Wednesday, when Democrats blocked the Senate from considering a bill on police reform by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC).

Scott, who is African American, has been working on the issue for years. He had the full support of the rest of the Republican caucus. He also agreed to consider whatever amendments Democrats offered.

They still used the filibuster to block the bill from even being debated.

The episode showed that Democrats do not actually care about police reform. Nor do they want to unite the nation behind any sort of bipartisan compromise. They simply want to use the issue in the elections, which they hope will give them the House, the Senate, and the presidency. Then they can get rid of the filibuster and pass whatever they want.

Comment: Another example of Democrats doing what they are not good at.


Clipboard

Iran issues arrest warrant for Trump, asks Interpol to act on killing of General Soleimani

Alghasi-Mehr/Trump
© radiozamaneh.com/New York Daily News/Reuters/Edgar Su/KJNAli Alghasi-Mehr โ€ข US President Donald Trump
Iran has identified 36 people involved in the US assassination of General Qassem Soleimani and will seek their arrest through Interpol channels, media reports said. The list of suspects is topped by President Donald Trump.

The names of the suspects in the high-profile murder of Iran's elite Quds Force commander have been relayed to Interpol by Tehran's chief prosecutor Ali Alghasi-Mehr, Iranian media said on Monday. The official called the killing a "murder" and a "terrorist act."
"President Donald Trump is at the top of the list, and his prosecution will be pursued even after his term is over."

Comment: Interpol has refused, saying it can't act the on Iranian request due to 'rules and collaboration protocols'.
The Lyon-based organization [Interpol] told RIA Novosti if it receives a request to arrest Trump, its own rules will not allow it to act on it. Interpol acts as a liaison between law enforcement organizations in member states, helping them to collaborate with each other in solving crimes and arresting suspects trying to flee justice in a different jurisdiction.

Interpol maintains political neutrality and is barred by its charter from getting involved in activities of a political, military, religious, or racial nature, a spokesperson for the organization said.
This is a smart ruse by the Ayatollah, assuming he colluded with the Trump administration to off a dangerous political rival.


Briefcase

The US indictment against Assange fails to disclose crucial info as required by UK law

Julian Assange
© Reuters/Pierre Albouy/KJNJulian Assange
The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has issued a new superseding indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. But the indictment fails to disclose crucial information as generally required under UK law.

This failure could be seen as highly prejudicial and therefore present another opportunity for the defence to lodge a challenge to the extradition request.

The indictment

On 24 June, the DoJ released a statement accusing Assange of conspiring with "Anonymous" affiliated hackers, among others. A 49-page document accompanying that statement provides further details. According to Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola, the document, one-third of which merely reiterates the original 18 charges, significantly:
"expands the [original] conspiracy to commit computer intrusion charge and accuses Assange of conspiring with "hackers" affiliated with "Anonymous," "LulzSec," "AntiSec," and "Gnosis."
The computer crime charge is not limited to March 2010 anymore. It covers conduct that allegedly occurred between 2009 and 2015.

Comment: We shall see if procedural irregularities and the above-mentioned flaws in the US case against Assange make a difference. Man against machine...hopefully he has a chance.


Arrow Up

'Sanction Schumer' calls for increased sanctions against Moscow, boding a new wave of anti-Russian hysteria

Schumer
© Reuters/Leah MillsUS Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
The US Senate minority leader, Democrat Chuck Schumer, seemingly got on his hobby-horse once more as he demanded new sanctions against Moscow amid reports about Russian agents putting 'bounties' on US troops in Afghanistan.

"We need, in this coming defense bill, which we are debating this week, tough sanctions against Russia," Schumer told journalists, emphatically gesturing to drive home the point.
The reason for the "tough sanctions" is a report by the New York Times that cites "interrogations of captured Afghan militants and criminals," and accuses Russia's military intelligence agency, the GRU, of literally offering bounties to the Taliban for every US soldier killed in Afghanistan.

Comment: Same debunked arguments, same mind lock, different year.

See also:
One more time! MSNBC asks Bolton if Trump's 'too afraid' to take on Putin because he helped him get elected


Snakes in Suits

One more time! MSNBC asks Bolton if Trump's 'too afraid' to take on Putin because he helped him get elected

Putintrump
© Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via ReutersVladimir Putin and Donald Trump meet on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan.
MSNBC is still doing its best to spread the theory that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election, thanks to an anonymous report from the New York Times claiming the nation paid militants to attack US troops in Afghanistan.

"Do you think that the president is afraid to make Putin mad because maybe Putin did help him win the election and he doesn't want to make him mad for 2020?" Chuck Todd asked of John Bolton in a Meet the Press interview on Sunday.

Comment: The last 6000 times this question was insinuated, the answer was emphatically 'NO'. Even miserable John Bolton could not answer 'yes'. We can't even say Chuck Todd was 'beating a dead horse'...there was no horse!


Airplane

MH17 trial prosecutors warn judges not to unravel Ukrainian cover-up, reject calling Gen. Konashenkov to testify

Ferdinandusse
Dutch state prosecutors told the court in the trial of the shooting-down of Malaysia Airlines MH17 that Major-General of the Russian Army Igor Konashenkov should not be allowed as a witness for the defence. To justify this in a hearing last Friday, the prosecutors revealed an illegal trick exposing the evidence in the case as a fit-up by the Ukrainian government's military and security agencies.

Dismissing almost all the defence applications to the court for new evidence and witnesses, prosecutor Ferdinandusse* (lead image, right) said: "We do not see any reasonable grounds for accusing the prosecution of not being objective" (June 26 hearing, Min 9:17).
[*] Ferdinandusse has a first name but this will not be reported. The reason is that Ferdinandusse repeatedly shows his animus towards the defendant, Oleg Pulatov, by refusing to use the conventional honorific "Mister". This is so customary in Anglo-American court practice that the Dutch refusal to observe it makes a display of prejudice towards the defendant. That this is exceptional Ferdinandusse revealed himself as he read his script. Twice he read out the name as "Mr Pulatov" -- at Min. 53:37 and 55:35. Ferdinandusse had typed the honorific in his script, but read it out by mistake; this is the exception that proves his prejudice. Ferdinandusse's practice is also in violation of the Dutch criminal code requiring the defendant in an indictment and in trial to be considered innocent until proven guilty. In court Pulatov is as much a Mister as Steenhuis the judge.
The trick the prosecution has asked the court to accept is that apart from the Ukrainian government's say-so, there is no chain of custody for the evidence of the weapon alleged to have been fired by the accused to destroy the aircraft and kill its occupants on July 17, 2014. If the Russian government says the Ukrainian government is lying, planting the evidence and fabricating the chain of custody, the prosecution has told the court to ignore the Russians - believe the Ukrainians. Presented in court last Friday, this chain of custody argument has transformed the trial into a Ukrainian war operation conducted by Dutch proxies, and mercenaries.

For there to be the trial of a crime there must be evidence; for there to be evidence there must be a chain of custody. Except in The Netherlands.

Comment: See also:


Bulb

White House cuts off deadweight in staff changes

White House
© Reuters/Leah Mills
President Trump has replaced his chief of staff, press secretary, legislative affairs director and domestic policy adviser and retooled his communications shop in a span of about three months and will soon bid goodbye to two top economic advisers.

Trump's White House has experienced a dizzying amount of staffing changes that began following his impeachment acquittal and seemed to accelerate with the arrival of new chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Trump has presided over a record amount of turnover in the Cabinet and senior levels of his administration, demonstrating a penchant for removing and replacing top officials as well as swapping existing staff into new roles.

But the recent staffing shake-ups have been striking particularly because of the proximity to the 2020 presidential election. Officials working in past administrations have been informally urged to hold off on leaving their roles in an election year until the ballots are cast in November.