• No end in sight for creepy DARPA human control programs
• Mind control: Pentagon's DARPA researchers learn to control rat's brain over internet
• Mass mind control: Human trials set to begin for brain implantation of DARPA microchips

• Worldwide volcanic activity uptick update, and new volcano discovered on Jupiter's moon Io
• Scientists spot never-before-seen lava waves on Jupiter's volcanic moon Io
• Stunning side-by-side video of Mars shows how the planet-wide dust storm has transformed the surface of the red planet

• Bad news for warmists: Sun has gone quiet - Weakest solar cycle in over 100 years
• Say Goodbye to Sunspots? The Ice Age Cometh!
• Sun's Magnetic Field May Impact Weather And Climate: Sun Cycle Can Predict Rainfall Fluctuations
• Cosmic Rays Reflect Stratospheric Weather
• Extreme weather 2017 caused by cosmic rays not CO2, the grand solar minimum amplifying effect
• Adapt 2030 Ice Age Report: Cosmic rays, atmospheric floods and record snows - are they connected? (VIDEO)

"I guess I worry about a couple of things. I think there's sort of the potential for unintended consequences of gene editing in people for clinical use. How would you ever do the kinds of experiments that you might want to do to ensure safety? And then there's another application of gene editing called gene drive that involves moving a genetic trait very quickly through a population. And there's been discussion about this in the media around the use of gene drives in insects like mosquitoes to control the spread of disease. On one hand, that sounds like a desirable thing, and on the other hand, I think one, again, has to think about potential for unintended consequences of releasing a system like that into an environmental setting where you can't predict what might happen."

CRISPR may be far more sophisticated and precise than previous genetic engineering techniques, but precision is no guarantee of safety, as these two studies reveal. There have been many occasions where a genetically engineered (GE) crop has been shown to be unexpectedly toxic or allergenic when the conventional crop had no such issues. The reality is that scientists really don't know what side effects may be produced by DNA tampering. The effects are extremely unpredictable.

Even CRISPR, for all its precision, creates off-target effects. This is a serious concern not only in medicine but also in agriculture. As noted in a recent paper,²³ "CRISPR technology is erasing barriers to genome editing and could revolutionize plant breeding." In plants, the potential for unintended effects such as toxicity and allergic potential remain high even with CRISPR technology, for the simple fact that when you alter one or two genes in a genome the side effects ripple through the whole genome.

A new protein could be created in the process that could be toxic or allergenic, or you could change the biochemical pathways of a plant, making it less nutritious or more toxic. Moreover, most GE plants are engineered for the express purpose of either expressing an internal insecticide or to tolerate direct herbicide application. So even if CRISPR technology improves the specificity of the genetic alteration, the toxic effects of herbicides and insecticides in the plant remain an issue.