The crisis did not start in 2022, it started in the mid-1990s - just as the Second World War really began with the post-First World War Treaty of Versailles, which was unfair and laid the foundations for what transpired.
Almost three decades ago, the West refused to strike a just arrangement with post-Soviet Russia. Instead, as it seemed to many at the time, it created a new domination system based on so-called "rules."
Others later referred to it more accurately as global liberal imperialism. But it was built on sand. It contained a World War III landmine that would sooner or later explode. Veterans like me tend to store memories, often misremembered, but I have been on the record since 1996-1997 that a world based on NATO expansion and Western domination would lead to war.
US-led hegemony began to crumble in 1999 when, in a daze of impunity, the bloc violated Yugoslavia. The crumbling went further when, in euphoria, it went into Afghanistan, then into Iraq and lost, devaluing its then military superiority and moral leadership. At the same time two even more important processes were taking place. Russia became convinced - after Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty - that it was impossible to build a just and lasting peace with the West, and began to restore its military might.
Thus, once again, as Moscow had done in the past, it began to kick at the foundations of Western domination in the global economic, political and cultural spheres, which was based on military superiority. This dominance lasted for 500 years and began to crumble in the 1960s. In the 1990s, because of the fall of the USSR, it seemed to have returned, but now Moscow has started to shake its foundations again.
At the same time, the West missed the rise of China. In parallel, an even more surprising mistake was made. In the late 2000s, it began to restrain both China and Russia simultaneously, pushing them towards a single political-military bloc that combined their core interests.
A manifestation of this was the 2008 economic crisis, which took place against the backdrop of the aforementioned processes and undermined confidence in the West's moral, economic and intellectual leadership.
Since the late 2000s the West has been creating the conditions for a Cold War. But there was still a window of opportunity to agree with Russia and China on the terms of the new world. It existed somewhere between 2008 and 2013. But it wasn't used. Since 2014, the US-led bloc has intensified its active policy of containment of China and Russia, including promoting a coup d'état in Kiev to prepare proxies to try and undermine Moscow.
The West - losing military, political and moral ground and even its moral core (look at Western Europe's move away from Christianity) - went on a hysterical counterattack. War was becoming inevitable, the question was where and when.
Covid was used as a substitute for two years. But once its effect had been diluted, a clash here or there became inevitable. Realizing this, Russia decided to strike first.
Comment: The author ascribes more sweeping motivations to Russia than there actually were. Putin clearly stated Russia's objectives in its Special Military Operation more than once: the de-nazification, de-militarization, and neutral status of a country with which it shares a long border. Moscow offered diplomacy every step of the way, until the attack on the Kerch Bridge. This was followed by the Nord Stream pipeline bombing, and most recently, an attack on the Russian escort ships guarding grain shipments from Ukraine.
Is it any wonder that after eight years of bombing Donetsk, being lied to at the Minsk talks, and taking as much care with the Ukraine civilian population as possible, Russia is finally fed up?
This operation had several aims: to prevent the West from creating a military offensive bridgehead on Russia's borders, which was rapidly taking shape, and to prepare the country for the long-term effects of conflict and rapid change. This requires a different model of society and economy - one of mobilisation.
The next goal is to purge the elites of pro-Western and "comprador" elements.
But perhaps the main thrust of the offensive from the perspective of world history, not just Russian history, is the struggle for the final liberation of the planet from the 500-year-old Western yoke, which has suppressed countries and civilizations and imposed unequal terms of engagement on them. First by simply plundering them, through colonialism, then neocolonialism, and later through the globalist imperialism of the last 30 years.
The conflict in Ukraine, like many events of the last decade, is not only about shattering the old world, it is also about creating a new, freer, fairer, more politically and culturally pluralistic and multi-colored world.
The global meaning of the fight in Ukraine is the return of freedom, dignity and autonomy to the non-West (and we propose to call it by another name - the Global Majority, which was previously suppressed, robbed and culturally humiliated). And, of course, a fair share of the world's wealth.
Russia cannot fail to win this war, although it will be difficult. Many of us had not counted on such a strong willingness on the part of the West to fight militarily, and on such a determination from some Ukrainians - who had been transformed into the likeness of the German Nazis previously set against Moscow - to fight desperately, and at their level of armaments. Probably, given the general global trends and the global balance of power, we should have struck earlier. But I don't know the level of readiness of our Armed Forces.
I think that in 2014 we definitely should have acted more decisively, abandoning hopes of an agreement.
Comment: In 2014, Russia was in no shape militarily or economically to begin any sort of action. It would have crumbled under the sanctions it now laughs off. It needed time to build itself and its alliances up. Putin has stated this clearly too.
We are living in a dangerous period, on the brink of a full-fledged third world war that could end humanity's existence. But if Russia wins, which is more than likely, and the hostilities do not escalate into a full-blown nuclear conflict, we should not look at the coming decades as a time of dangerous chaos (as most in the West are saying). We have been living in this period for a long time.
It will be, if we choose a world of constructive creation and the attainment of freedom, justice and dignity by peoples and nations.The old system of institutions and regimes has already collapsed (freedom of trade and respect for private property). Meanwhile, institutions like the WTO, the World Bank the IMF, the OSCE and the EU are, I am afraid, reaching their last years.
New bodies are beginning to emerge to which the future belongs. They are the SCO, ASEAN+, the Organisation of African Unity and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The Asian Development Bank is already lending many times more than the World Bank. Not all new institutions will survive, and let us hope that a number of them will survive, especially in the UN system, which urgently needs reform to primarily represent the Global Majority in the secretariat, rather than the West.
The main thing is to prevent a losing West from stalling history or derailing it through a world war.
Not only Global Majority countries, but Western countries can live quite happily in this world. The West will simply lose the opportunity to plunder the rest of the planet and it will have to shrink a bit. They will have to live within their means.
I am afraid that this new world taking shape now will be created beyond my intellectual or physical life. But my young colleagues and certainly their children will see it.
But this beautiful vision has to be fought for, first of all by preventing a third world war, because of the attempted revenge of the West. Again, it was in Europe that the first two world wars were unleashed. Russia is now fighting, among other things, to ensure that the prerequisites for a third are not ripe. But conflicts will occur in an era of rapid change. So the struggle for peace should be one of the main themes of our intellectual community and the world at large.
Professor Sergey Karaganov is the honorary chairman of Russia's Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, and academic supervisor at the School of International Economics and Foreign Affairs Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow
Reader Comments
Sorry Sergey but you sound like a member of the Atlanticists, a fifth column inside the Russian government. You must be dug in very deep because most of you like-minded 'academic' associates scurried off the Russian ship two years ago.
Sergey is a Russian CFR senior member, a globalist and he speaks the same language and thinks many of the same thoughts as Yuval Harari. He even looks a bit like him.
And we won't know until it happens.
Best of the Web: The dark origins of the Davos Great Reset
Important to understand is that there is not one single new or original idea in Klaus Schwab's so-called Great Reset agenda for the world. Nor is his Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda his or his...This agenda continues under Klaus Schwab and the WEF. You may ask, how could one man, David Rockefeller, so mold the world in his own image, over so many years?
Well, in 2009 the Russians after 50 years declassified and released a KGB study dated 1959, which had assessed the wealth controlled by the Rockefeller family, principally John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and his six children. It amounted to $75 billion, distributed among over 1,000 corporations, trusts, foundations and institutions. In that year of 1959 the entire tax revenues of the US Government were $79 billion. That one family owned as much wealth as the entire United States of America. Klaus Schwab is merely an acolyte of David Rockefeller, and this is their ongoing agenda:
The cult of Globalism: The great reset and it's 'final solution' for useless people
The idea of the Great Reset derives from the New World Order which is still alive in the minds of the establishment or who we can call the globalists from people like Henry Kissinger to the...Now, one would imagine that there is a permanent state of war between Communists and Capitalists. This is a lie. The Soviet Union would not have lasted 5 years without constant infusions of cash, technology, and infrastructure from the capitalists of Wall Street (mostly Jews,) who had financed the Bolshevik takeover in 1918. It was Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. on Wall Street who gave the orders for the assassination of the Romanov Royal Family in 1919, to end the last hope of freedom for the Russian people, by destroying forever their national icon in which their culture was personified, their Tsar.
Why would the capitalists finance the Bolsheviks, you may ask? Simple: Because the Soviet State owned everything in Russia, and had a slave population of 170 million living in abominable conditions, slaving their entire lives for the all-powerful State, and the capitalists in the West, who financially owned the Soviet Union, thus had 170 million slaves working for THEM. The interest on their loans to the USSR, plus the resources which were exported to the West from the USSR, all went to them.
And that, dear friends, is what they are trying to re-create on a global scale today. (The present war in Ukraine has nothing to do with Ukraine. It is aimed at destroying Russia. Lloyd Austin, John Bolton, and Hillary Clinton have all said exactly that, in public and as quoted in the MSM. China comes next.)
You will own nothing, and you will be happy. You'd better declare yourself to be happy, as unhappiness will lead to a swift death. Unhappiness will not be permitted. Just as it was not permitted in the USSR. Smile and keep your mouth shut.
Many innocent dupes belong to the WEF, just as many dupes are Freemasons, and many dupes are members of the CFR, not realizing the Satanic agendas of these organizations, which present themselves as altruistic and humanitarian. Only Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping stand in the way of the realization of this enslavement of the entire human race and ownership of the entire planet by a tiny class of oligarchs. Two men. Pray for their safety.
RIGHT HERE 👉🏻 [Link] SMDH
Is ranting about Globalism Anti-SemItic ? [Link]
Like Danny Glover said in Predator 2 - “your cutting my Dick off & shoving it up my Ass”. [Link]
Bonus: Spine-Chilling prediction of Corona Virus/Vaccine [Link]
ANTI-GLOBALISM is ANTI-SEMITISM - RIGHT HERE 👉🏻 [Link] SMDH
Is ranting about Globalism Anti-SemItic ? [Link]
Like Danny Glover said in Predator 2 - “your cutting my Dick off & shoving it up my Ass”. [Link]
Bonus: Spine-Chilling prediction of Corona Virus/Vaccine [Link]