Opponents of affirmative action hoped that the Supreme Court had delivered a death blow to the controversial policy in 2023 when Chief Justice John Roberts declared for the court's majority that "Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it."
But as sweeping as that pronouncement was, it came in a ruling in the landmark
SFFA v. Harvard case, solely barring the use of racial preferences in college admissions.
The practices that the court deemed illegal on campus have persisted elsewhere, including in programs across the federal government.A
lawsuit now wending its way through the courts,
Revier v. Loeffler, aims to change that. Building on the
SFFA ruling, the suit's plaintiffs are taking aim at regulations that they allege direct agencies to unconstitutionally dole out tens of billions of dollars in awards on the basis of race - most prominently through no-bid or limited competition contracts reserved for so-called "Small Disadvantaged Businesses" and facilitated by the Small Business Administration. The case could have
wide implications, as the SBA's definition of disadvantage has been widely adopted by many other federal agencies.
Comment: This is just part of the picture. Between the US, UK and Israel, no other country comes close to their psywar capabilities, and they've been doing this for a long time, dating back to the turn of the century.