Health & WellnessS

Sun

Salt - Is It Really the Problem It Is Made Out to Be?

Image
© Photo courtesy of www.naturallygreen.co.uk
Is salt the real problem that it is made out to be? It seems that by oversimplifying the information on salt and its relationship to health we complicate what is a really simple and important issue. After reviewing more than 100 scientific papers it became clear that salt is not the public enemy that it is made out to be, rather it appears to be an imbalance of minerals as a result of eating processed foods. And some very simple changes can make a lot of difference. This does not mean you go out and lather salt on all your food and justify it from my article, instead it means back to some common sense dietary changes.

Salt, in the form of sodium chloride, has been consumed by humans since the late Palaeolithic period, when it was used to preserve and flavour food. In modern times, however, some very limited studies and an incomplete understanding of nutrition have led to salt being labelled "public enemy number one" when it comes to blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. But is salt really so bad?

Salt in the human diet has been the subject of a great deal of research. Health professionals have, for many years, recommended reduction or even elimination of salt intake. This is mainly due to findings that link the excessive salt in the modern human diet to health problems such as high blood pressure. Yet it would be shortsighted to simply accept or reject such recommendations, as there are other factors involved requiring further investigation.

Salt intake is widely recognised by public health and medical organisations as the leading cause of blood pressure disparities (1). However, it is simply not valid to state that reducing salt intake will lower our prevalence of hypertension; the truth is that a number of factors, including lifestyle and nutrition, play an important role.

Bacon

Idiotically Dangerous Diet "Reverses Diabetes" but So Does Moderate Carb Restriction Without Calorie Restriction

Image
All last night and this morning my email inbox has been filling up with notes pointing me to this story:

Crash Course Diet Reverses Type 2 Diabetes in a week.

It is yet another example of the tragically flawed pseudo-science that damages the health of people with diabetes.

There's no mystery here, nor is the effect reported a result of "reducing fat in the pancreas" as the doctor who came up with this "cure" suggests. All he has done is craft a "balanced" diet that has so few calories it is also low in carbohydrates.

As all my readers know, most people with Type 2 diabetes--especially those recently diagnosed--can recover normal blood sugar control simply by cutting back their carbohydrate intake to somewhere between 30 and 100 grams of carbohydrate a day. The actual number varies with the size of the person, their gender (men can usually tolerate more carb), and the ability of the individual's beta cells to secrete insulin.

But a low carb diet with normal calories is a high fat diet, and doctors have been brainwashed to believe that high fat/low carb diets cause heart disease. They don't. You can read the research that has proven this HERE.

People

The Stigma of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Image
My husband snaps a picture as I wait for the doctor
I've been sick since 2001 when I failed to recover from what appeared to be an acute viral infection. It has left me mostly house-bound, often bed-bound. In effect, I've had the flu without the fever for almost ten years: the aches and pains, the dazed sick feeling, the low grade headache, the severe fatigue. It cost me my career as a law professor; it cost me the ability to be active in the lives of my children and grandchildren.

Because I meet the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition, I've been given the diagnosis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Although there have been some promising developments (a possible connection to a retrovirus; the presence of unique proteins in the spinal fluid of CFS patients), as of this writing, there's no proven cause and no cure. This is not surprising, given that so little money is allocated for research into this debilitating illness. Why? One reason is the absurd name. As others have pointed out, calling it, "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome," is like calling Emphysema, "Chronic Cough Syndrome," or Alzheimer's, "Chronic Forgetfulness Syndrome."

Comment: There is some evidence to suggest that CFS is linked to a stomach virus, thus healing the gastrointestinal tract may prove beneficial to CFS patients. For more information about the importance of detoxing and creating better health and wellness read the following threads on the forum:

Important threads for Diet and Health

Detoxification: Heavy Metals, Mercury and how to get rid of them

Anti-Candida, Inflammation, Heavy Metals Detox and Diet

Detoxify or Die Cookbook


Pills

Newspaper Takes Money from Food Company to Promote Cholesterol-reducing Food by Apparently Non-Existent Journalist

Image
© allwomenstalk.com
Have you heard the adage 'don't believe what you read'? In the area of health I believe this is generally good advice. Trawling through newspapers has convinced me that much of what is written about how best to manage our health is based more on science fiction rather than fact. I believe this applies as much to anything else to the constant drip-feed of information we get about cholesterol and its supposedly artery-clogging effects. By way of example, take a look at this article which appeared in the on-line version of The Telegraph - a British 'broadsheet' newspaper. At first sight, it looks just like any other on-line article. For one thing, it's written by 'Telegraph journalist' 'Chris Jones'.

Ms Jones tells us how downing cholesterol-reducing Flora pro.activ drinks each day has helped her get her cholesterol levels down to a "much better figure." Pieces of this nature have long been used by companies to legitimise and add credibility to their products by blurring the lines between editorial and advertising - that's why they're called 'advertorials'.

The risk with advertorials is that they will promote the benefits of the product being pushed, and fail to mention some important failings. So, please allow me to fill in the blanks that Chris Jones appears to have left...

First of all, products like Flora pro.activ are sold to us on the basis of their cholesterol-reducing ability. My attitude to this is 'so what?' That's because the impact that a food or anything else has on cholesterol is irrelevant - it's the impact it has on health that counts.

Comment: Our research has shown that low-fat diets and cholesterol-reducing drugs do not contribute to the health of individuals. For a better understanding of the necessity of fats in the diet - read the following:

What If It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?

The Origins of the Cholesterol Con

Dispel the Myths: Why You Should Eat Cholesterol


Question

Cesarean Section Rates Hit All-Time High, Study Shows

NewBorn
© Live Science

Rates of Cesarean section deliveries in the United States climbed to 34 percent in 2009, hitting an all time high, a new study says.

Florida, New Jersey and Texas had the highest rates, while Utah, Wisconsin and Colorado had the lowest of the 19 states included in the study.

"Obviously, a 34 percent C-section rate is far too high," said Jacqueline Wolf, a researcher at Ohio University who wasn't involved in the study. "Medical reasons alone cannot possibly explain why more than one in three American women need major abdominal surgery in order to safely give birth."

A C-section (cesarean section) is necessary to remove the baby from the uterus when a vaginal delivery could risk the health of the mother or the baby, or when a prior C-section makes vaginal delivery difficult or dangerous.

"In many cases of C-section in recent years, the benefits may be questionable and important healthcare organizations, including the Joint Commission and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, have endorsed safely reducing C-sections rates in certain types of pregnancies," wrote the study researchers.

The new study was performed by HealthGrades, a company whose website allows patients to search for and rate physicians.

Smoking

5 Health Benefits of Smoking

Smoking
© Live Science
Who says smoking cigarettes is so bad ... well, aside from the World Health Organization, Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and every medical board and association on the face of the Earth?

But should smokers be fortunate enough to dodge all that cancer, heart disease, emphysema and the like, they will be uniquely protected - for reasons unexplained by science - against a handful of diseases and afflictions.

Call it a silver lining in their otherwise blackened lungs. Although long-term smoking is largely a ticket to early death, here are (gulp) five possible benefits from smoking. Breathe deep.

Comment: Let's All Light Up!


2 + 2 = 4

Traditional Bone Broth in Modern Health and Disease

Introduction

Broth, made from the bones of animals, has been consumed as a source of nourishment for humankind throughout the ages. It is a traditional remedy across cultures for the sick and weak. A classic folk treatment for colds and flu, it has also been used historically for ailments that affect connective tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract, the joints, the skin, the lungs, the muscles and the blood. Broth has fallen out of favor in most households today, probably due to the increased pace of life that has reduced home cooking in general. Far from being old-fashioned, broth (or stock) continues to be a staple in professional and gourmet cuisine, due to its unsurpassed flavor and body. It serves as the base for many recipes including soup, sauces and gravy. Broth is a valuable food and a valuable medicine, much too valuable to be forgotten or discounted in our modern times with our busy ways and jaded attitudes.

Comment: It's important to avoid bones from battery farming animals but from wild game if possible. The same goes for vegetables. They should be organic in order to avoid pesticide concentration.


Megaphone

How Healthy Lifestyle Can Prevent HALF of All Alzheimer's Cases

Image
Disease: Changes in lifestyle could reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer's
Half of all Alzheimer's disease cases could be prevented by lifestyle changes such as exercise, eating healthily and not smoking, claim researchers.

They say hundreds of thousands of patients could potentially avoid the devastating illness by simply changing bad habits.

Around 820,000 people in Briton suffer from dementia, of whom half have Alzheimer's, and this is expected to rise to a million within the next ten years.

For the first time, scientists have calculated the extent to which certain lifestyle traits - including lack of exercise, smoking and obesity - all contribute to the disease.

Comment: For more information on better ways to prevent and treat Alzheimers read the following:

Benefit Of Combination Therapy For Alzheimer's Disease Confirmed

Reversing Alzheimer's memory loss may be possible

Research Suggests Marine Oil May Prevent Alzheimer's Disease

Reversal Of Alzheimer's Symptoms Within Minutes In Human Study

Nutrients Stimulate Brain Connections, Could Treat Alzheimer's


Whistle

Gamma-Irradiated, Virus-Sprayed FRANKENFOODS

There is a profound misunderstanding in the mass market today about the value of certified organic food. The question is not whether the 30% or more you pay at the register for an organic product is really worth the added vitamin, mineral and phyto-nutrient content you receive. Even though organic food does usually have considerably higher nutrient density, it is not always the positive quality of what it contains that makes it so special. Rather, it is what you know the organic food does not contain, or has not happened to it on its journey to your table, that makes buying organic a no-brainer to the educated consumer. Let me explain.

The FDA presently supports and actively promotes the use of Cobalt-60 culled from Nuclear Reactors as a form of "electronic pasteurization" on all domestically produced conventional food. The use of euphemisms like "food additive" and "pasteurization" to describe the process of blasting food with high levels of gamma-radiation can not obviate the fact that the very same death-rays generated by thermonuclear warfare to destroy life are now being applied to food to "make it safer." This sort of Orwellian logic, e.g. WAR is PEACE, is the bread and butter of State sponsored industry propaganda.

Alarm Clock

Doctors To Pregnant Women: Wait At Least 39 Weeks

 A rendering of a 36-week fetus in the womb.
© Researchers A rendering of a 36-week fetus in the womb.

In her living room, Caroline Nagy introduces the newest member of her family - the 6-week-old infant in a striped onesie cradled in her arms. "This is Alex Joseph. He was born May 24th - my birthday," she says.

Their shared birthday wasn't entirely a coincidence. Two weeks before her due date, Nagy was swollen, and uncomfortable. So she asked her doctor for relief.

"I was just miserable. It was like uncomfortable to walk; I couldn't sit on the floor and play; I felt like I was neglecting my first kid because I just couldn't move and I couldn't do anything," says Nagy. "So I asked, 'Is there any way I can speed this up and have a baby earlier?' "

For Jackie McGinty, it wasn't discomfort but timing that caused her to schedule her daughter's birth by C-section eight years ago. McGinty's first child was delivered by C-section for medical reasons, and although this time around she had hoped to deliver naturally, she had just moved out of state and wanted her family nearby to help with the baby.

"My mom was coming out and she was only going to come out for a few weeks. I needed her to be there after the birth. ... So having the option to schedule it was good for us," says McGinty.