OF THE
TIMES
Both drones and cruise missiles were used to attack the refinery at Abqaiq and the Khurais oil field, flying over southern Iraq and Kuwait to avoid Saudi air defenses, according to CNN's source. This information was also quoted by AFP, but it was unclear whether their source was the same official or a different one.See also:
CBS News quoted a "senior US official" who said the Saudi air defenses did not stop the drones and missiles because they were pointed south, to detect and prevent attacks from Yemen.
While Washington immediately blamed Iran for the attack, the Saudi authorities have been more circumspect, with Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman saying they "don't know" who was behind it just yet.
France was likewise skeptical, with Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian telling reporters he had seen no evidence indicating the origin of the attack just yet.
"Up to now, France does not have any proof that would allow us to say where the drones came from," Le Drian, who is on a working visit to Egypt, told reporters on Tuesday.
Speaking at a news conference with his Egyptian colleague, Le Drian urged a "strategy of de-escalation" and seconded Saudi calls to involve the UN in the investigation.
Riyadh to Invite Int'l Experts to Join Investigation Into Attacks on Oil FacilitiesSee also:
Riyadh also called on the international community to "take a firm and clear position against this reckless behaviour that threatens the global economy."
Houthi rebels regularly conduct drone attacks on facilities in Saudi Arabia, which has been providing air support to Yemen's internationally recognized government in its fight against Houthis since spring 2015. At the same time, US officials have claimed that intelligence indicates Iranian involvement in the incidents. Iran firmly denied any involvement.
"On a daily basis Yemen is being bombarded and innocent civilians are dying ... so they have to retaliate. Yemeni people are exercising their legitimate right of defense ... the attacks were a reciprocal response to aggression against Yemen for years."Rouhani added his hope that the conflict in Yemen would be resolved through diplomacy, and said that such a process might even mirror Syria's Astana talks.
While Saudi Arabia is investigating the attacks on its oil facilities, President Donald Trump has said that "it certainly would look like" Iran was the culprit. Yet, he also noted he doesn't want another war.
Trump's statement, made to reporters on Monday, is the latest in a series that stop short of outright blaming Iran for the attack, which has already been claimed by Houthi rebels in Yemen. Earlier in the day Trump tweeted that "there is reason to believe that we know the culprit," before questioning Tehran's denial of the strike.
Other US officials have been more forceful in ascribing blame. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo immediately called the "unprecedented attack" the work of the Iranians, and hawkish US Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) called for retaliatory strikes on Iranian targets.
Amid rising fears of conflict, Trump boasted of the US' military might, saying that "the United States is more prepared" for a conflict than any country in history, but told reporters that he would "certainly like to avoid" war. "I don't want war with anybody," the President said.
Saturday's drone attacks targeted two oil refineries in Abqaiq and Khurais in the country's east. The strikes cut off half of Saudi Aramco's oil output, or five percent of the world's supply.
The Kingdom's foreign ministry added later on Monday that it will invite international experts, including UN officials, to investigate the attack.
1. The moment your data is out of the SCIF (or if it never made it there), you can safely assume that it's being read by every decent intelligence organization in the world. HRC's emails were no exception. So, the moment her emails were placed on a private server everyone (including her IT team) were reading them.We know from expert analysis that Hillary used at least six different personal phones over the years. Here she is with phones 1 and 3:
2. Every decent intelligence agency has a whole department dedicated to senior US political figures like the Secretary of State, the FBI Director, etc. These teams can have dozens of individuals who on daily basis analyze everything the target does.
Like for example what restaurant they visited last night (then another team hacks into the restaurant's high resolution CCTV system, gets the video footage, and a different team does some lip reading).
Tracking someone like HRC would have quickly revealed that she was using a non-government issued phone. As a matter of fact, she was using six different phones. This meant that her voice/email/messaging had to be non-government based. Once that was known, intercepting the calls, messages, and emails of HRC becomes a trivial problem.
Comment: RT reports: What does it say about a candidate who flouts his country's basic laws? Although this is of course to be expected with Netanyahu: