LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK AND JOE QUINN
Since the 9/11 attacks, no book has provided a satisfactory answer as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately responsible for carrying them out - until now.
· Riding the Wave: The Truth and Lies About 2012 and Global Transformation by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
No Kindle? Get the FREE Amazon Kindle Reader software for your computer, phone, or tablet!
| Current total: 194,061 € | Status: Level 2 |
Gee they can mention Comet Honda that probably wont be visible from the northern Hemisphere but fail at all to mention Comet Elenin? The comet thats coming directly in between the sun and the earth on Sept 26 2011, The one that has everybody up in arms and some scientists are saying it may just be under intelligent control. The one thats tail may actually hit the earth and rain down unwanted meteor showers? Well glad I mentioned it then.
This continued blackout on ELEnin is extremely irresponsible of the these people. One cannot undermine the intense speculation and FALLOUT because these ass&^%$ that control the press REFUSE to release INFORMATION or truths about ELENIN! shame on them !
when elenin turns up in the next 3months, it will be great, beacuses then nasa will hav to identify what this random comet is. MAYBE. plus if elenin does turn up that means hercolubus is on its way and will be able to see that in 2012, carnt wait. [Link]read this and read well keep scrolling down theres blank pages
Hey, folks, Be Wise and Expect little from an article that claims “The moon will be directly between the Earth and the Sun “ and yet mentions no solar eclipse. i.e., an astrophysical impossibility. (Ask Ark- and if I’m wrong, I’ll most humbly, yet certainly defer to him or other more qualified souls.)
The exact quote is "July 30 - New Moon. The moon will be directly between the Earth and the Sun and will not be visible from Earth. This phase occurs at 18:40 UT” when what they apparently meant was that, at that time, "the moon will be as close as it gets, in its particular 28 day cycle, to being . . . "directly between the earth and the sun, “
And this truth still applies if the eclipse happens to be visible only over some obscure ocean or distant pole, for any competent report would comment upon same or clarify that “when we said "directly between”, uh, well, we really meant “somewhat between” or “kinda between” - Yeah, that’s the ticket!”
There are literally, in this instance, worlds of differences between those statements.
Such self-evidently false “statements claiming to be truthful” display an underlying incompetence, stupidity, flaw, and/or fraud. (I personally vote for the first alone.) The readers of any self-respectingly-competent and frank space/astronomy-based website would have or should have noticed and corrected this long before it was relinked here. I don’t see same, and shan't further try to save the world’s self-serving, self-deceiving, or unreasonably extraneously deceived or misled souls, fools, or idiots from themselves or their cohorts/misleaders beyond the time here expended.
Beyond that, as some soul wiser than myself once said: “ “Nuff said.”
God bless, and the best of ye first, if God be fair.
R.C.
Sott.net is controlled media....
There are plenty of articles on SOTT already discussing comet Elenin.
Shaka2622, states: “Elenin! what about Elenin?” and “Sott.net is controlled media....,” to which vinny validly replied “there are plenty of articles on SOTT already discussing comet Elenin.”
Shaka2622, I certainly agree with you that there exist many “controlled media” websites, which are those having improperly undeclared “controller(s)” and whose words, articles, actions or inactions are designed to conform to certain ulterior motives and/or agenda(s) of those sites’ undeclared “controller(s).” I’m also confident that you’re aware of such classic, discovered, and proven examples like “Project Mockingbird” or COINTELPRO, and the very high likelihood that to this day, there remain still-undiscovered successors of same, along with a near infinitude of varying levels of control by various improperly undisclosed “controllers.” See, e.g., sites that shill a particular company simply in order to up the value of a particular stock, that they undisclosedly have an interest in, etc., etc.
I also agree that this very incomplete and imperfect article - see, for example, my comment above about “directly between,” and eclipses, etc. - should have included Elenin, and I agree that the fact that it did not is likely due to some improperly undeclared control upon that site, (KHTS) and/or sources there linked. (Do those sources it links likewise omit Elenin???) Now if SOTT only or mostly linked such articles, most of us would soon find ourselves looking at other sites in the natural human pursuit of discovery of truth. However, it’s been my experience that on articles like this, the good folks at SOTT usually throw comments regarding such omissions into the body of the article. Moreover, it seems like they might be under some extraordinary pressures at present as per the absurdities discussed in “The French Connection Redux” article at the top of the SOTT home page on 7/29/2011. Ultimately, however, SOTT’s mere linking of this article does not mean that it too is controlled.
Your statement that “Sott.net is controlled media...” requires that out there, in the great WWW, can be found three categories of “media” websites:
1. Media, Uncontrolled;
2. Media, Controlled; and,
3. Media, other/not relevant to the point. (E.g., a now deceased homemaker’s website with no advertising, nor hope of same, which simply provided links and articles on what were, at that time, the latest cookie recipes, etc.)
I, like most folks I know, would certainly prefer to read the most uncontrolled and expansive media sites available (i.e., Category 1, Media, Uncontrolled), which of course would also be the sites most likely to be both honest and openly dedicated to ascertaining and revealing truth rather than propaganda. (We’ve all seen sites change and become co-opted or cowed out of Category 1, into Category 2, resulting in an ever shrinking pool of Category 1 sites.) Leaving Category 3 out of it as irrelevant to the issue, and given that you have concluded that SOTT falls into Category 2, “Media, Controlled,” I would simply request that you provide some examples - frankly, the more the better - of the sites you consider to be Uncontrolled Media.
Finally, I would also greatly appreciate your theory as to who the improperly undeclared controllers of SOTT might be.
R.C.
There is a very stimulating article on VeteransToday by Paul Sheridan which ought to be on SOTT also - its called The New March to a New Cosmology and debugs the Bing Bang theory plus Einstein and supports the electromagnetic universe...there is also a splendid video snippet on multiculturalism within the wide ranging article...its a very good all round article. Their website is easy to find...
SOTT, Laura, et al have recommended The Electric Sky, by Donald E. Scott, Jim McCanney's books and the work of Walter Thornnhill, et al, (Thunderbolts), which all fairly well deconstruct the holy grail of astrophysics - The Big Bang, with valid astronomical observations and solid scientific interpretation.
It is good to see plasma theory finally coming out of the closet. Much wailing and gnashing of teeth by orthodox astronomy.
the quote of today:-
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
- Albert Einstein
How about "Illusion is as much a reality, albeit a very pervassive one...
go to the article on VT and see the issue about Einstein "One Stone"
This program is very good, set your location and run it to see what's visible on any given night. Great for learning the night sky and finding out what you are looking at.
[Link]