© Bloomberg
In Australia, where Victoria state has been reporting record deaths, some 3,000 checks last month on people who should have been isolating at home found 800 were out and about. In Japan, where the virus has roared back, people are staying home but aren't in isolation: 40 per cent of elderly patients are getting sick from family members in the same apartments.
Comment: A deliberate framing of the facts that makes forced isolation appear to be the only solution. It's not, but that is what the PTB want people to think so they can have an even finer order of control over people.
The failure to effectively manage contagious people with mild or no symptoms is a driving factor behind some of the world's worst resurgences. But lessons from Italy, South Korea and others that have successfully contained large-scale outbreaks show that there's a tried-and-tested approach to cutting off transmission: move them out of their homes into centralized facilities while they get over their infections, which usually doesn't require longer than a few weeks.
Comment: A tried-and-tested approach that doesn't always work: Mystery: Argentine sailors infected with virus after 35 days at sea
"A laissez-faire approach naively trusting everyone to be responsible has been shown to be ineffective, as there will always be a proportion who will breach the terms of the isolation," said Jeremy Lim, adjunct professor at the National University of Singapore's Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health.
Faced with a new cluster this week after 102 days without a locally transmitted case, New Zealand has quickly enacted this strategy, placing 17 people -- including two children below the age of 10 -- into centralized quarantine.
Comment: How exactly is putting 17 people, including children, into forced isolation after 102 days of without a locally transmitted case praised and not considered an over-reaction crossing the line into totalitarian tyranny? How did the line move from simply needing to spread out the infections so as not to over-whelm the hospital systems all at once to no cases are allowed at all, ever?
But other countries facing sustained spread like Australia and the U.S. are not broadly enacting the policy despite its proven track record. Their unwillingness -- or inability -- to do so underscores the challenges faced by liberal democracies whose populations are less likely to tolerate measures that require individual sacrifice for the greater good.
Comment: Hydroxychloroquine has a proven track record as well. The unwillingness or inability for liberal democracies to use such a cheap and effective treatment underscores the challenges faced by normal humans whose governments ignore obvious solutions in favor of practices that destroy their lives and livelihoods because it benefits some small and powerful group.
Not at Home
The existence of a large group of carriers who hardly feel sick is a unique feature of the coronavirus crisis, and a major factor that has driven its rapid spread across the globe. Unlike in previous outbreaks like the 2003 SARS epidemic, many infected people don't feel ill enough to stay home, and so spread the pathogen widely as they go about their daily lives.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has estimated that 40 percent of COVID-19 infections are asymptomatic.
Comment: Given the political and practical difficulties involved in getting an accurate number of asymptomatic infections, this should be taken as a likely underestimation of the real number.
In Wuhan, the Chinese city where the coronavirus first emerged last year, mildly sick patients were originally turned away from hospitals and told to rest at home, given that the overwhelmed health-care system needed to tend to the most severe cases. But health experts soon found that these people would infect their family members and others as they moved around in the community, precipitating a deluge of cases.
Comment: Scaremongering intended to illicit a desire for some solution to the "dangerous and deadly" situation.
Bringing mild or asymptomatic patients to designated facilities -- re-purposed convention centers, hotels and stadiums -- for basic medical care marked a turning point in the city's fight against the coronavirus. Simply separating them from healthy people halted the pathogen's silent spread through the community.
Comment: And once again forced isolation is the only solution presented though it is not the only possible solution.
The strategy has since been used in Italy, Singapore and South Korea at the height of their own coronavirus outbreaks earlier this year. Faced with a resurgence last month, Hong Kong converted an exhibition center to accommodate mild COVID-19 patients and is building more such facilities.
In New Zealand, the government put "a lot of thought" into enacting the policy, and is asking family members of confirmed cases to go into centralized quarantine with them if they require care, said director general of health Ashley Bloomfield.
Comment: Bullsh*t. The only thought that went into enacting the policy was how much fun these people will have being in almost absolute control over peoples lives.
The approach is effective firstly because it prevents people from infecting family members in the same household -- over 80 percent of cluster infections in China cities were in households after mild patients were allowed to stay home, said a Lancet study. In Europe, the surge of household infections drove Italy's Milan to start putting such cases in hotels, enabling the country to gain control over its outbreak in early May.
Beyond household spread, the strategy is necessitated by a facet of human nature that's been seen time and again across countries and cultures: left to their own devices, some people just won't follow the rules.
In Australia and Japan, infected people who've been told to stay home have gone out for a variety of reasons -- some can't work from home and need the income, while others want to pick up groceries and supplies. One woman in Tokyo traveled cross country by bus after having her infection confirmed.
"It is far better to be more aggressive in the short term with even mild cases than it is to allow such cases to slip under the radar," said Nicholas Thomas, associate professor in health security at the City University of Hong Kong.
Comment: If your life and livelihood are ruined in the process of having isolation forced upon you, then that is the cost of serving the greater good. At least you'll be able to sleep soundly in your ditch as a homeless person knowing what your sacrifice meant to literally no one.
Locked Up
But forcibly moving mild or asymptomatic patients into centralized facilities has been met with backlash in some countries where citizens are not as accepting of government directives. Some people might lose their jobs if they disappear for two weeks, or have caretaking responsibilities for young children or older parents where it's unfeasible to be separated.
"People would be wondering what on earth they're doing locked up in a hospital," said Stephen Leeder, emeritus professor of public health and community medicine at the University of Sydney. "From what I know about the Australian psyche, I don't think it would go down all that well."
In places like Venezuela and India where conditions in quarantine facilities are poor, the prospect of being taken away has caused some to avoid being tested or to lie to contact-tracers for fear of being found positive, making the work of health officials more challenging.
In an emailed response to Bloomberg News queries, the Department of Health and Human Services in Victoria said the government provides alternative accommodation for quarantine, but that these are for health workers "who may not be able to safely live at their normal address" and other vulnerable groups.
Rather than forcing isolation on mild cases, authorities have locked down 5 million residents in Melbourne and are tightening restrictions until new cases come under control.
Comment: Forcing total isolation on a few people or locking down an entire city, which is the lesser evil? Neither. It is a fool's choice as there are other alternatives, but the author and the authorities don't want to acknowledge them as they provide real solutions and do nothing to increase the government's power and control over the population.
Officials are using a combination of stepped-up checks and fines of A$4,957 ($3,550) to convince infected people to stay home, while repeat offenders risk a A$20,000 penalty in court. More than 500 military personnel are helping the police conduct checks on 4,000 households every day to ensure those who are supposed to be staying home are there.
Comment: Threatening people who can't stay home because they can't afford to take time off with fines they'll never be able to pay is abhorrent and inhumane. Especially considering that their staying home is needless and unnecessary.
To be sure, aggressive and thorough contact-tracing and case follow-up have successfully contained outbreaks in countries like Germany without a centralized quarantine strategy. But these places relied on an army of efficient workers hunting down every chain of transmission, a resource not many governments have had time to build up.
Comment: Contact tracing has failed everywhere it's been tried because there's neither enough adoption of the apps necessary for the tracing to work nor is there enough honest cooperation among the citizens for the tracers to do their jobs well. This is just blowing smoke to shore up the position that forced isolation is the only solution.
"The classic practice in public health is to identify, trace and quarantine," said Yang Gonghuan, former deputy director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. "But how that is carried out depends on popular sentiment and the country's resources."
Always trust a name with see saw in it!