© TimeThe May 21, 2012, cover of Time
The provocative cover, published online Thursday, was met with the predictable Twitter jaw-drop.
"Love the Time cover," AllThingsD.com's Peter Kafka wrote. "In the cringiest way possible."
"Anybody else slightly slack-jawed over this week's Time cover?" The Atlantic Wire's Adam Clark Estes asked rhetorically.
"Breastfeeding your 3-year-old is one thing," the Daily News' Bill Hammond wrote. "But putting a picture of him doing it on the cover of Time?"
"The kid on the cover of this week's Time magazine is really going to hate middle school," Gavin Purcell observed.
"Heads up, parents!" John Cannon warned. "If you're planning to take your kids grocery shopping, you will have to explain this Time mag cover."
"I would be way more impressed with Time if they put a mom on the cover in the typical age bracket of 'attachment parenting,'" Salon's Irin Carmon tweeted. "Not a 26-year-old."
Time managing editor Rick Stengel defended the decision for the cover.
"We used an image that represents the attachment of a mother and child," Stengel said on MSNBC's Morning Joe. MSNBC showed the cover but blurred the breast out during the broadcast. ABC's The View covered it up, too.
"I don't wince when I look at the picture," he continued. "I think it's provocative. I think it's a little whimsical. I think she represents an outlier of women who are breastfeeding beyond one year. The cover is meant to get your attention. It gets your attention. I think this is a legitimate debate. It's a debate lots and lots of women are having."
It's not the first time Time has put a breastfeeding mom on its cover. In 1999, the magazine's cover featured a woman breastfeeding her baby for a special report on the war in Kosovo. And Time has featured breasts on its cover before for stories related to breast cancer.
It's worth noting that the international cover of Time's May 21 issue does not feature a breastfeeding image--it's new French president Francois Hollande.
Nonetheless, it's likely going to get Time magazine censored at some newsstands. New York's Hudson News has a history of covering up magazines in its window display that put scantily clad women on their covers. In 2006, the Grand Central Terminal newsstand put sheets of paper over three consecutive issues of FHM.
Later that year, Hudson News censored an issue of Marie Claire featuring a topless Ashley Judd.
Reader Comments
In contemporary tribes kids are breast-fed from 1 to 4 years with an average of probably 3 years. Thinking of a 3 year old as "too old for breastfeeding" is a modern culturual prejudice. Maybe its due to the sexualization of women you noted and that we think of it as a pathological relationship if a 4 year old is still breast-fed.
If so, then I believe that they extend the breastfeeding period because it is less of a load on the shared food supply.
We do not really have that problem in western society and thus the breastfeeding period can be shortened, if so desired.
*with an average of probably 2 years.
is with the camoflage pants on junior. He'll grow up to be a nice little state educated robot killer thing after all that good motherly nourishment, won't he? Another fine day in clowntown. Anybody heard from the mammy-nuns lately?
Why the hell does every damned thing
HAVE TO BE OVERSTATED ? ?
It makes some uncomfortable to see a child breastfed,but the same folks have little problem with public displays of homosexual shenanigans.
The west is a mess.......
Personally, I have no problem with public breastfeeding as long as I am not made to feel like a sleaze for sneaking a peek. I'm sorry but it's very hard to resist when it's being flaunted.
As far as this picture goes, it's a bit creepy imo, especially since the mom is particularly attractive. Instantly my thoughts get dirty and then I realize how wrong that could be considered to be.
If the kid has teeth, I'd say this is a big clue that it's time to stop breastfeeding.
Just my opinion.
Love your comment Lisa. A healthy dose of common sense.
My maternal grandmother used to breastfeed her babies about one and half years, it was a form of natural birth control.