"The purpose of GLADIO was to attack civilians, the people - women, children, innocent people, unknown people, far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force the public to turn to the State and demand greater security. Under a strategy of tension, you 'destabilize in order to stabilize', to create tension within society and promote conservative, reactionary social and political tendencies."
~ Italian neo-fascist whose prosecution led to the discovery of NATO's 'Gladio' networks across Western Europe
CSIRO was involved in cloud seeding back in 1947 but pulled out for various reasons including these... The "Persistence" and Verification Problem:...
An interesting read - "My Big Toe: A Trilogy Unifying Philosophy, Physics, and Metaphysics" - by Thomas Campbell (B.S. and M.S. in Physics)[Link]
good behavior really. what good is a prison system which doesn't adequately reward model prisoners for their correct behavior(s)? the system needs...
Schumm and colleagues used the clock to look for evidence of dark matter, the invisible, massive substance that is thought to pervade the universe...
how about the whole universe is conscious
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
This geezer should have lived long enough to know that "resource" is not a stand alone concept. He even obliquely references the fact that it was the invention of a technology capable of using oil (which was in the ground for how may millions of years without a technology to use it?) that defeated Parson Malthus's similar argument: oil provided a means of feeding the increased population--a feat Malthus swore could not be done "because of the mathematics."
I don't know whether to laugh or cry when you ask me for money then push articles repeating the genocidalist message of the "Georgia Standing Stones ("we need to destroy billions of people to survive") and claim to know what you are talking about.
I thought all intelligent people knew that the concepts of "non-renewable resources" and "interest rate banking" were long ago joined at the hip (as Joseph Farrell argues in his book on the subject). Certainly you know that the means of "free energy" were invented long ago by Tesla, based on a new physics you seem to have never heard of, and that this physics was suppressed , of course, by J, P Morgan (yes, the banker) who instead promoted Einstein. Later, as Constable said in his 1977 book on the subject (studiously ignored by Laura), when confronted with this physics Einstein "proved he preferred bombs." So the bankers' physics and the Colorado geezer's arguments go hand in hand, don't they?
The truth is, that "resources" are defined by human cognition and inventiveness and are ever-changing as a function of that same attribute of humanity; they are "not crap in the ground that cannot be renewed therefore you will die." That is the sort of argument you get from a jerk who does not know enough to call a plumber when the bathroom in his apartment house is too small (see the video if you can stomach it).