OF THE
TIMES
" Comment: Encouraging news, but it could be a feint. The same regulations on censorship and centralization of power could still be brought in...
At the end of the day - may the best ideas prevail. The chips are on the table. Place your bets!
Excellent SOTT comment.
Quote: "You gotta include the media, think tanks, and academia in this โ in addition to the military-industrial complex and the political class....
Cynthia Chung is one of the best journalist/historians at revealing the dark underbelly of USA created wars to subjugate countries, murder the...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
MIVILUDE is the depth of thought given to "vectoring" the thinking/feeling of the public. On one hand we have a group protecting the public from the supposed threat of rampant cults and cult behaviors, while on the other we have obvious counter-intelligence programming occuring to induce the same cultish behavior. Who benefits, huh? The beneficiaries are those in power playing both sides like Clint Eastwood's character in Sergio Leone film "A Fistful of Dollars." The right-hand knows what the left-hand is doing, although it would seem "inconceivable" to most that this depth of depravity could exist.
Note, too, that concluding that MIVILUDES is delusional and seeking to "justify its own existence" does at least two things further corrupting possible clear viewing and identification of what is - in fact - going on: 1) it imparts volitional agency to governmental bureau, thereby displacing blame to a tool rather than the maker(s) of the tool; and, 2) it permits the development of a meaningless discourse as concerned but ill-informed and "vectored" discussants set about fixing it or exposing it in opposition to some equally "vectored" protectorate.
In the course of the former, an absence of critical thought can be seemingly excused because we all know "how stupid government programs, agencies, etc." can be. This is more vectoring. How long have morally defunct, non-emphathic trolls hid behind the curtain of bureaucracy (Cases in point: Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Chaney, Paul Wolfowitz, etc.)? Did they start this meme or repurpose it to their ends? Regarding the later, this is seen all the time, especially in the two-party North American State.
Still, I doubt this writer is some COINTEL pro -- just an ontologically confused explicator of the day's happenings.