© Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested Monday for the courts to give them until 2076 to review and fully release the documents pertaining to the approval of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.The FDA denied Sept. 9 a
request for an expedited release of the vaccine's approval records from a group of doctors and scientists, the Public Health Medical Professionals for Transparency (
PHMPT). The PHMPT has since filed a
lawsuit against the FDA for failure to complete their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The agency had
determined that there were a total of 329,000 pages that needed to be reviewed in order to fulfill the plaintiff's FOIA request, and proposed that they would be able to "process and produce the non-exempt portions of responsive records at a rate of 500 pages per month." The FDA said they would provide the plaintiff with prioritized documents and release the non-exempt portions of the records on a "rolling basis." This rate of review places the FDA's release of the documents at nearly 55 years.
"This rate is consistent with processing schedules entered by courts across the country in FOIA cases," said the FDA, explaining that the plaintiff's request for documentation within a 4-month timeframe would force the FDA to have to work through 80,000 pages per month.
Due to an inability to reach an agreement on a set disclosure schedule, the plaintiffs have called for a hearing to argue their case before a judge, according to
The Epoch Times.
© ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty ImagesA vial of Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is seen at a pop up vaccine clinic in the Arleta neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, August 23, 2021.
The PHMPT had filed the lawsuit on Sept. 16, 2021, stating that although the Pfizer vaccine was approved and described by the FDA as meeting "the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product," others with large social or media platforms have publicly raised questions regarding the sufficiency of data used in the review of Pfizer's vaccine.
The PHMPT states in the lawsuit the importance of releasing this information to the public, as
federal law provides that "After a license has been issued, the following data and information in the biological product file are immediately available for public disclosure unless extraordinary circumstances are shown." The PHMPT stated that the purpose of their organization is to adequately disseminate information to the public regarding all COVID-19 vaccines and to ensure that the FDA is maintaining its commitment to transparency.
"The FDA's promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions," wrote attorney Aaron Siri in a blog post, whose firm is representing PHMPT in the lawsuit, according to The Epoch Times.
"It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine," said Siri. "Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizer's documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public," Siri continued, reported The Epoch Times.
Pfizer's BioNTech vaccine was approved for use Aug. 23, 2021 for individuals 16 or older, and approved for kids ages 5-11 Oct. 29, 2021."Releasing this data should also confirm the FDA's conclusion that the Pfizer Vaccine is safe and effective and, thus, increase confidence in the Pfizer Vaccine," the PHMPT said.
The Daily Caller reached out to the FDA with a request for comment, but the agency did not respond in time for publication.
Reader Comments
How's things in Kawartha land? Here I see lots of lights going up on houses, and cheer being spread. It's nice. I get ticked off when I read some of the news, but in general my spirits are brighter. Really, this can't last forever, can it? We will prevail.
shitshot. it's not easy keeping bright eh but it's up to us to light the waySometimes fake news gets to me too, so it is important to affirm our life and lighten up where we can. Bless all of you.
[Link]
[Link]
The Swedes blew up the dam with their study and the water began to flow. If, under the influence of the Spike protein, DNA recovery and repair stops after it enters the cell nucleus, it means degeneration. Degradation not only at the level of nerve cells (fatigue, dizziness, coordination disorders, memory loss, loss of ability to experience higher feelings, observed personality change, dementia, etc.) but also degeneration anywhere. If the process of its side effects goes from the inside out, from the bone marrow to (hematopoietic disorder) to the skin (necrosis, inflammation of the skin, inflammation of the subcutaneous vessels). All oncology is all about repairing and restoring DNA, and if it doesn't, cancer arises. But children are already learning that in elementary school. In the case of a healthy self-preservation instinct, this alone would lead to the idea of โโa door with a sign โAttention! Danger of injury! โ Once you open them, you have to be very careful! And you also run the risk that they may shut themselves behind you and you have no idea where the key is from them.
[Link]