OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
Comment: Let it be noted that the Houthi's actions are not indiscriminate. They have clearly defined what is a target and what is not. Any ship...
Elephant Seal in BC today, is RC fascinated? RC knows why he's on the other side, prematurely. 😔 [Link]
They're starting to 'eat their own'.......running scared, looking to see who will be the scapegoat since some lawsuits are starting to emerge....
This article seems a bit " homo-sapiens-centric " "Adoption of stone tools or fire, or intensive hunting techniques, are extremely flexible...
Sadly, the next time it will be the same. Most people will do whatever they are told, whatever the consequences. In a way, I think there are...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
[Link]
"I got that 4'9 and 1500lb gorilla in the room. He says, I'm not here to lie about the pain, I'm here to make you feel it"
That's when I start referring to "tons of pro" and the brightest light.
If explains why psaki emptied the interview room with Biden and Johnson
workat home...)*
Bonus song at above link, Marty Stuart, 'Hard working man.'
I'm just a random guy.
The powers that exist believe in social science. DARPA has their New Social Science 2 program where they study collective identity to manipulate the people. Is this a benevolent study? It is to control.
The interview flowed beautifully. Nick showed how education at the college level has morphed into its opposite. In my view this morphing was manufactured over time. The story about the "Climate Activist" student tells you what has happened to education.
Nick talks about the breakdown of family, and the result of it in the black community where 9 of 10 end up dead or in prison. In my view, this too has been engineered through RAP music becoming the example to follow.
Nick recommends reading groups to create civilized conversation of freedom and equality for example. This sounds great for the literate who have been fortunate to read real literature. Our education system has dumbed down many. How to teach/reach them? In some way we need a rebirth of spiritual values.
There needs to be equality of opportunity, but there is free will and choice as Nick states. We each choose and learn from mistakes, or we descend into moral nihilism.
And a poorly written "General Welfare" clause in the same. (Interpreted to facilitate the Nanny State, producing generations of entitlement disease, particularly corporate )
The authors thereof were the progenitors of today's corporatists/bankers/property swindlers.
“The nationalists, placing their faith in persons and being skeptical of the people, were reluctant to allow a popular government to interfere with private business and not at all reluctant to conduct the business of government by interweaving its doings with those of private business and businessmen.” E Pluribus Unum p6
“The Founding Fathers, being skeptical of man's virtue, designed a republic whose actuating principle would be the opposite. The untidiness of the system necessitated that the operation of American government would ever recapitulate its process of birth. That is, the system was born of compromises—some arrived at openly and some under the table, some arrived at through ‘respectable’ means and others through ‘corrupt’ deals—and it could be made to work only through similar methods. So cumbersome and so inefficient was the system that the people, however virtuous or wicked, could not activate it. It could be activated through deals and deceit, through bargains and bribery, through logrolling and lobbying and trickery and trading, the tactics that go with man's baser attributes, most notably his greed and his love of power to those republicans who viewed the ‘grand question’ as what kind of national government should be created, rather than whether one should be created at all, the Constitution would be likely to be unpalatable.” E Pluribus Unum p194-5
" by 1787 a number of Americans had come to believe that even that modicum of democracy was incompatible with security for liberty and property. In thinking the subject through, James Madison and various others focused upon a feature of republics that had always been troublesome, namely, the tendency of men to divide into factions or parties and to put the interests of the parties ahead of those of the public." Novus Ordo Seclorum p162
That's how we got here. And this is but a wee drop in the ocean of evidence.
[Link]
Its people STILL thinking a constitution will solve the Swamp's political venality that is this country's problem.
Go read the Anti-Federalist Papers and see just how prescient their predictions were. Read Thomas Paine's Common Sense and see if we don't have today in the Beltway exactly what he spoke of WRT Britain.
Anti-Federalist Papers #16 “When I look to our situation-climate, extent, soil, and its productions, rivers, ports; when I find I can at this time purchase grain, bread, meat, and other necessaries of life at as reasonable a rate as in any country; when I see we are sending great quantities of tobacco, wheat and flour to England and other parts of the globe beyond the Atlantic; when I get on the other side of the western mountains, and see an extensive country, which for its multitude of rivers and fertility of soil is equal, if not superior, to any other whatever when I see these things, I cannot be brought to believe that America is in that deplorable ruined condition which some designing politicians represent; or that we are in a state of anarchy beyond redemption, unless we adopt, without any addition or amendment, the new constitution proposed by the late convention; a constitution which, in my humble opinion, contains the seeds and scions of slavery and despotism. When the volume of American constitutions [by John Adams] first made its appearance in Europe, we find some of the most eminent political writers of the present age, and the reviewers of literature, full of admiration and declaring they had never before seen so much good sense, freedom, and real wisdom in one publication. Our good friend Dr. [Richard] Price was charmed, and almost prophesied the near approach of the happy days of the millennium. We have lived under these constitutions; and, after the experience of a few years, some among us are ready to trample them under their feet, though they have been esteemed, even by our enemies, as ‘pearls of great price.’”
Anti-Federalist #38 "It is degrading to a freeman, and humiliating to a rational one, to pin his faith on the sleeve of any man, or body of men, in an affair of such momentous importance…. I deny that we are in immediate danger of anarchy and commotions. Nothing but the passions of wicked and ambitious men will put us in the least danger on this head. Those who are anxious to precipitate a measure will always tell us that the present is the critical moment; now is the time, the crisis is arrived, and the present minute must be seized. Tyrants have always made use of this plea; but nothing in our circumstances can justify it…. I have seen enough to convince me very fully, that the new constitution is a very bad one, and a hundred-fold worse than our present governmen t. "
“Even the most enlightened inhabitants of the interior of New Hampshire—and of the Berkshire Hills and Worcester County, Massachusetts, and of Pennsylvania west of Harrisburg, and of the piedmont of lower Virginia and all of North Carolina and the South Carolina up-country—normally did not have contact with national authority from one year to the next, felt the existence of their state governments only through the militia muster and the annual visit of the taxgatherers, and encountered information, ideas, or people from the outside world only two or three times a year. To them it was as unreasonable to suppose that the thirteen states could be well governed by a single national government as it had been to suppose that the thirteen colonies could be well governed from London. Accordingly, for most people all the force of inertia was opposed to the Constitution, and it took something special to bring them to think otherwise.” p196-7 E Pluribus Unum
Anti-Federalist #68 “When you have a strong democratical and a strong aristocratical branch, you may have a strong executive. But when those are weak, the balance will not be preserved, if you give the executive extensive powers for so long a time. As this government is organized, it would be dangerous to trust the President with such powers. How will you punish him if he abuse his power? Will you call him before the Senate? They are his counsellors and partners in crime. Where are your checks? …. But were a revolution to happen here, there would be no means of restoring the government to its former organization.”
“ Many American Patriots became disillusioned with the idea of checks and balances by reading a single, grand polemical tract, Thomas Paine's Common Sense. To say that the English constitution was a ‘union of three powers, reciprocally checking each other,’ Paine wrote, is ‘farcical.’ The contention that the Commons provided a necessary check upon the king presupposed that he had ‘a thirst for absolute power’ which made him untrustworthy, and that the Commons was wiser and more deserving of trust. Yet the constitution also gave the Crown the power to check the Commons, which ‘supposes that the king is wiser than those whom it has already supposed to be wiser than him.’” p83 Novus Ordo Seclorum
“When political independence was secured, the stark doctrine of the Declaration went into abeyance, with only a distorted simulacrum of its principles surviving. The rights of life and liberty were recognized by a mere constitutional formality left open to eviscerating interpretations, or, where these were for any reason deemed superfluous, to simple executive disregard; and all consideration of the rights attending ‘the pursuit of happiness’ was narrowed down to a plenary acceptance of Locke's doctrine of the predminent rights of property, with law-made property on an equal footing with labour-made property p63 Our Enemy, the State
All you seem to know about the origin of that parchment likely came from the Pablum of PubEd. You imply that I am a troll of sorts. Well so would be Patrick Henry, who opposed the Constitution, Benjamin Franklin who did not like it, but signed it anyway to please those men present, nor Thomas Jefferson, who when he learned of it while ambassador to France was convinced those men involved were seeking to lay down the equivalent of a king in the vestige of a "President." You may call them trolls too.
Get some political history under your belt. To effectively argue a case in the positive, you have to know it well enough to argue against it.
Who are the readers that you write this for? Whether only D44 or SOTTites in general, you should have enough 'common sense' to recognize that what valid points you might have are hugely and objectively weakened by those selfsame ad hominems.
To paraphrase: RC
My original question stands, please give a better Constitution. Or are you suggesting anarchy?
I figure you might appreciate what I'm listening to: (it's actually in my paste memory) " Weed, whites and wine." Little Feat, Waiting For Columbus, Willin: [Link]
And, something it followed to: TP doing that song: [Link]
RC
And: Second, re Mr. Capaldi, any relation to Jim of Traffic* or Karen of Colorado?
R.C.
*Saw them 7/94 in Orlando at a concert that was almost empty because they purposely refused to advertise (and play, as I recall) any of Windwood's smash solo stuff and they announced it in advance. I have always admired Steve for that. PHENOMENAL SHOW! I'd always learned to play every damn bar chord that existed, and watching that, it was there the light went off and I told self: 'Hey, dumbshit: Using a capo's a lot easier". (E.g., John Barleycorn.)
RC