"There are many ways of thinking about God. Some see God in DNA, some think of God as the universe, and others think of God in Biblical, personified terms," said study lead author Professor Kathryn Johnson. "We wanted to know if scientific engagement influenced beliefs about the existence or nature of God."
Comment: See: Scientists: Since DNA is the software of life, how can you have its incredibly complex programming without a programmer?
Study co-author and graduate student Jordan Moon explained that, even though science is often thought of in terms of data and experiments, it may mean more to some people.
The research team examined two types of scientific engagement - logical thinking or experiencing the feeling of awe - to get a better understanding of how they may affect an individual's religious beliefs.
The study participants were asked to report on how interested they were in science and how committed they were to logical thinking. The individuals were also asked how often they felt awe, or an overwhelming feeling of wonder that often leads to open-mindedness.
The participants who reported both a strong commitment to logic and having experienced awe were found to be the most likely to have faith in God. These individuals commonly described God in an abstract and unconventional way, as being mystical or limitless.
"When people are awed by the complexity of life or the vastness of the universe, they were more inclined to think in more spiritual ways," said Professor Johnson. "The feeling of awe might make people more open to other ways of conceptualizing God."
"A lot of people think science and religion do not go together, but they are thinking about science in too simplistic a way and religion in too simplistic a way," said study senior author Professor Adam Cohen. "Science is big enough to accommodate religion, and religion is big enough to accommodate science."
The study is published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Reader Comments
I seem to remember that the church once upon a time, didn't take too kindly to those who expanded their minds and suggested that nature was responsible for all we now know and see.
Faith, to have complete trust, or a strong belief, and science, the bedrock of all we are supposed to know.
They both rest on dodgy ground, neither ever sure of there convictions.
Science is a momentary concept, proven, until proven otherwise, in constant flux, searching for the Holy grail of all that is yet to be known.
We say we have faith in this, attach a belief in something that is here today and gone tomorrow.
Pagans celebrated the bounty, of the harmonisation of mankind and the planet in which they stood.
No silly God's to be fearful of, and their practice was that which produced the best yield.
Two is company, three is a crowd, so I'll let you decide as to what works best together science, faith and God.