OF THE
TIMES
Heaven and hell are eternal places because they are always present at the extremes of human existence, for better or for worse. People are constantly choosing between them, although they are generally not conscious of that in an articulated manner.
Washington doesn't reflect the body's stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Russia's envoy has said ... I wonder if that is a prelude to an...
Over the years the Russian admin has learned all its lessons well. Their biggest, IMO, was learning that their information would not be seen or...
And we all wonder why america is fucked? Attacking people protesting a modern genocide? These protestors need protecting. Quite a few US sites are...
Yeah Perfidious Albion. That includes the whole of Great Britain, Blake was right. Then and now. How will telling me I'm intolerable help our...
The people cannot really complain too hard when they allow unelected and treasonous criminals to pull the levers of power, making themselves...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
Thinking about tradition, repetition, and novelty. I think that the emergence of novelty, should expand on, and/or improve the tradition, and not destroy it, at least at the social cultural level. Today's SJWs for example, seem hellbent on destroying just about everything. Which sort of brings into the equation, the influence of pathogens and ponerology. I guess at the scientific level, novelty could overthrow an existing paradigm that is flawed, like Darwinism? I think what I am saying is, for changes to be evolutionary, novelty doesn't delete repetition/stability. Novelty enhances, expands, improves.
I like the idea that the human mind is in a "symbiotic relationship" with the information field, (for want of a better term)? That consciousness introduces novelty, depending on the level of consciousness, of course.
Damn! I wish I'd written that!
Well stated, sir, well stated.
R.C.
R.C.
Jest joshing. (And I don't recall reading that previously.) Thus, thank you!
R.C.
[Link]