OF THE
TIMES
The more I hear reports about such excessive violence perpetrated by jews (Khazars ?), the more I wonder if the claimed persecution of this group...
C'mon babylong, make it funnier. "This came about because the WH video showed Kamala hiding a bag of white powder - right, you know where - and...
Because of the recent post that HAARP can create auroras, I question whether this was a test of how effective it was. In other words, they are...
'Flesh-eating' streptococcal disease cases skyrocket in Japan in just 1 year, surge followed covid vaccine rollout What a coincidence ... :O Don't...
I think it won't take long until the French government will bring the soldiers back home - because they are needed there.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
To my knowledge we've not found any mummified creatures older than thirty or forty thousand years. There have been several high profile incidences of people in academia losing their jobs for finding soft tissue in ancient specimens and then questioning the dating method rather than trying to come up with some ludicrous reason that proteins and DNA should last well beyond what is reasonable given the discoveries of paleontologists and archaeologists over the past hundred years or more.
I am more inclined to think our dating methods need to be re-evaluated. Mt. St. Helen volcanic ash fall had accumulated and solidified in the surrounding rivers for thirty years when some enterprising people chipped off a piece of this 30 year old rock and sent it to several labs for conventional dating. No report came back at less than 5 million years old.
I'm convinced they don't have a clue when it comes to age... How do they date a dinosaur? By the age of the layer its in. How do they get the age of that layer? By the dinosaurs found in the layer.
Mmmm, ok
Or maybe it was one of our 'fresh from Florida' "Lubbers",
[Link]
OR,
One of our American Roaches.
[Link]
R.C.
P.s., the roach is obviously photoshopped.
R.C.
No mention of that.
This is no more than 12,000 years old. It was engulfed in a tsunami, swamping continents in water, sand and corals. All the "Extinctions" happened at this time. ElectroMagnetic forces rip open unstable isotopes, causing them to appear to be depleted by time.
One proof that has occurred to me is the Vger, Voyager, probes. Their radioactive power sources should have failed a while ago. But as they left the influence of the largest EMF source, the Sun, the isotopes have slowed in their decay. This should affect the heat they give off, eventually causing failure of radio, but has in the meantime meaning more transmissions.