OF THE
TIMES
Time to state the Bleedin obvious as Monty Python used to say. USA,UK France Germany and Netherlands infiltrated at the highest levels of...
BBC captured by transgenderist muppets. On Radio4,( The main BBC News channel) at 6.30 in the evening after the Main 6.00 news there has been a...
. Quote: Two centers with different signs - an anticyclone to the west of Moscow and a cyclone to the east of Moscow - created conditions for the...
The more I hear reports about such excessive violence perpetrated by jews (Khazars ?), the more I wonder if the claimed persecution of this group...
C'mon babylong, make it funnier. "This came about because the WH video showed Kamala hiding a bag of white powder - right, you know where - and...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
ANYTHING nuclear- anywhere in the world- would give them reason to instantly clamp down on everything. Free speech, movement, news, data- all could be changed overnight by a simple small yield nuke going off even in a completely unpopulated area. The radiation risk would be minimal- as planned by the neocons- but would be effective in increasing the control level worldwide. This is of course pure speculation, but is based on the rather primal thought processes they use.
I'm interested to know if anyone else thinks along these lines as well, and if not, where is my error in my current thought on this.