© Spike
One lesson from military history is that once mobilization for war begins, it takes on a momentum of its own and is uncontrollable.
This might be what is occurring unrecognized before our eyes.
In his September 28 speech at the 70th Anniversary of the United Nations, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia can no longer tolerate the state of affairs in the world. Two days later at the invitation of the Syrian government Russia began war against ISIS.
Russia was quickly successful in destroying ISIS arms depots and helping the Syrian army to roll back ISIS gains. Russia also destroyed thousands of oil tankers, the contents of which were financing ISIS by transporting stolen Syrian oil to Turkey where it is sold to the family of the current gangster who rules Turkey.
Washington was caught off guard by Russia's decisiveness. Fearful that the quick success of such decisive action by Russia would discourage Washington's NATO vassals from continuing to support Washington's war against Assad and Washington's use of its puppet government in Kiev to pressure Russia, Washington arranged for Turkey to shoot down a Russian fighter-bomber despite the agreement between Russia and NATO that there would be no air-to-air encounters in Russia's area of air operation in Syria.
Although denying all responsibility, Washington used Russia's low key response to the attack, for which Turkey did not apologize, to reassure Europe that Russia is a paper tiger. The Western presstitutes trumpeted: "
Russia A Paper Tiger."
The Russian government's low key response to the provocation was used by Washington to reassure Europe that there is no risk in continuing to pressure Russia in the Middle East, Ukraine, Georgia, Montenegro, and elsewhere. Washington's attack on Assad's military is being used to reinforce the belief that is being inculcated in European governments that Russia's responsible behavior to avoid war is a sign of fear and weakness.It is unclear to what extent the Russian and Chinese governments understand that their independent policies, reaffirmed by the Russian and Chinese presidents On September 28, are regarded by Washington as "existential threats" to US hegemony.
The basis of US foreign policy is the commitment to prevent the rise of powers capable of constraining Washington's unilateral action. The ability of Russia and China to do this makes them both a target.
Washington is not opposed to terrorism. Washington has been purposely creating terrorism for many years. Terrorism is a weapon that Washington intends to use to destabilize Russia and China by exporting it to the Muslim populations in Russia and China.Washington is using Syria, as it used Ukraine, to demonstrate Russia's impotence to Europe - and to China, as an impotent Russia is less attractive to China as an ally.
For Russia, responsible response to provocation has become a liability, because it encourages more provocation.
In other words, Washington and the gullibility of its European vassals have put humanity in a very dangerous situation, as the only choices left to Russia and China are to accept American vassalage or to prepare for war.Putin must be respected for putting more value on human life than do Washington and its European vassals and avoiding military responses to provocations. However, Russia must do something to make the NATO countries aware that there are serious costs of their accommodation of Washington's aggression against Russia. For example, the Russian government could decide that it makes no sense to sell energy to European countries that are in a de facto state of war against Russia. With winter upon us, the Russian government could announce that Russia does not sell energy to NATO member countries.
Russia would lose the money, but that is cheaper than losing one's sovereignty or a war.To end the conflict in Ukraine, or to escalate it to a level beyond Europe's willingness to participate, Russia could accept the requests of the breakaway provinces to be reunited with Russia. For Kiev to continue the conflict,
Ukraine would have to attack Russia herself.The Russian government has relied on responsible, non-provocative responses. Russia has taken the diplomatic approach, relying on European governments coming to their senses, realizing that their national interests diverge from Washington's, and ceasing to enable Washington's hegemonic policy. Russia's policy has failed. To repeat, Russia's low key, responsible responses have been used by Washington to paint Russia as a paper tiger that no one needs to fear.
We are left with the paradox that Russia's determination to avoid war is leading directly to war.Whether or not the Russian media, Russian people, and the entirety of the Russian government understand this, it must be obvious to the Russian military. All that Russian military leaders need to do is to look at the composition of the forces sent by NATO to "combat ISIS." As George Abert notes, the American, French, and British aircraft that have been deployed are jet fighters whose purpose is air-to-air combat, not ground attack. The jet fighters are not deployed to attack ISIS on the ground, but to threaten the Russian fighter-bombers that are attacking ISIS ground targets.
There is no doubt that Washington is driving the world toward Armageddon, and Europe is the enabler. Washington's bought-and-paid-for-puppets in Germany, France, and UK are either stupid, unconcerned, or powerless to escape from Washington's grip. Unless Russia can wake up Europe, war is inevitable.
Reader Comments
the world wants to ban anything that might make anyone , anywhere,uncomfortable:
but despite all their efforts - this will never work for any longer than the time it takes
to prepare for the next WAR - because people that cannot even listen to what is
going on in the world, will be the first ones to die when the anger boils over:
And no amount of fake legislation will ever keep the truth from reaching center stage!
You got any doubts that BHO ain't Muslim.
Instead of spending so much time screening kids Christmas cards made for Veterans, why don’t they spend a little more time providing treatment for the Veterans and moving more of them through treatments reducing waiting times. Folks we are losing our country and we are losing it fast.
Check it out
[Link]
[Link]
Obama’s military command will prevent delivery of Christmas cards being sent from families to their servicemen loved ones overseas spokesmen for The Pentagon said today. The White House claims that traditional Christmas greetings wish will upset Muslims in host countries and will have to be confiscated and returned to the sender.
Per executive order, all overseas military mail will be monitored for references to Christmas, Jesus Christ, or pork products which are known to offend Muslims.
An Army Veteran who reached out to Fox News said Pentagon leadership is “hypersensitive to anyone who says they feel like their rights are being violated.”
“It’s extremely frustrating,” the soldier said. “The U.S. Military is living in fear of radical Muslims.”
The soldier, who asked not to be identified because he feared being disciplined or assaulted my Muslims, said many people are furious over the censorship
“If soldiers cannot speak the name of God, let alone Christ, what are we fighting for?” he asked. “I’ve towed the company line for years but this has pushed me too far to sit quietly while personal liberties are trampled upon.”
The soldier said in recent months they have been reminded that they cannot proselytize and they cannot share their faith say anything nice about Jesus or Christianity.
“We are strongly discouraged from having any kind of Christian items on our desks or in our offices,” he said Texas-based Liberty Institute sent a demand letter to the White House, insisting they immediately drop this policy which allows a generic greeting but disallows references to Christmas, which is officially recognized as a national holiday under federal law.
Liberty Institute’s Director of Litigation, Hyman Stratcher, responded in a statement, “Obama is once again engaging in unlawful religious discrimination. It is shameful that the military continues to censor religious speech in Christmas cards while allowing atheists,gays, and satanists to send porn,drugs,electronic cigarettes,or any other ungodly thing they want.”Imam Al-Suq Akweer of the Islamic Friendship Coalition applauded the move as a step in the right direction in the quest for improved Islamic relations.
"Disbelievers are trying to draw Muslims away from the straight path".he said,"Christmas Day and associated celebrations are among the ''falsehoods'' for a Muslim to avoid.A Muslim is neither allowed to celebrate the Christmas Day nor is he allowed to congratulate them. Americans on Muslim soil must learn to abide by our customs to ensure peaceful relations.The ban will go into effect December 1st. Military personnel will be given handbooks to explain what can and cannot be sent from home.
Posted by Fox Entertainment
Kirwan -
Only 5 minutes long and speaks volumes about the Religion of Peace.
With what is happening in Paris at this moment - a prelude to what is going to happen in this country.
VIDEO FROM PARIS THAT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN IN THE U.S.A., Australia or Canada
YET! CLICK BELOW:
[Link]
Your link is a bad connection
an analysis right here, right now, please correct me wherever you think I'm wrong and also any input is welcomed.
#1 : WW3 is planned for after 2,175 AD when the first Earth like colony on Mars will be ready, so
the let's call them "Important" people of the planet will be in safe distance while we, the pleb will try to survive in a hellish environment.
#2 : Military momentum was pickin' up during the "Cuban missile crisis" when again we nearly
blew up the planet.
#3 : Syria now is what Cuba was then. Only this time it's worse because every country with a considerable military force is on Defcon2 which is dangerous.
#4: Countries which can not play a serious military role in a global conflict are in deep economic or social trouble which renders them neutral but some of the countries with a strong military force also face deep socio-economic trouble which renders them dangerous.
So either we are at a critical point (again) and we need to defuse the situation (again) and only
the defending side can do this like in Cuba (that means Putin and Assad) or we switch down to Defcon1
and kiss this planet goodbye. In other words like back in the sixties the Kennedys who were later assassinated (and maybe that's the future for both Assad and Vlad) defused the situation along with their staff now it's time for the other side to do the same.
Let's see the geopolitical aspect of the whole situation. In the 1st zone Canada, Mexico, Central and Latin America can't do much. Forget the Brits, they don't exist, the rest of Europe simply doesn't have enough fire power, including Scandinavia. Africa is a dead zone. So that leaves the Eastern
Mediterranean as the starting point of a world conflict with all the major militaries, especially towards Asia on alert. Ok, fine so far,
but that doesn't explain 2 things : The Why (I mean from my standpoint I fail to see it) and Why now ? Doesn't make any sense. If we wanted to commit suicide on a global scale we still have a few decades ahead.
So yes, global situation on the red lines but highly unlikely to explode now. I really hope I reached the correct conclusion.