password
© www.ibtimes.co.uk America's Code of Conduct.
Global technology giants like Google and Microsoft have teamed up with civil liberties groups to get Congress to change the country's spying laws. Tech companies say they're potentially losing billions in sales following Edward Snowden's NSA revelations.

More than 40 companies wrote a letter to Congress and the Obama administration, sent Wednesday. Industry leaders such as Apple, Google and Facebook got in touch with civil liberties organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union to try and get Washington to change its spying laws, in the wake of the NSA scandal.

"Now is the time to take on meaningful legislative reforms to the nation's surveillance programs that maintain national security while preserving privacy, transparency and accountability," the group said in the letter. "[T]he status quo is untenable and it is urgent that Congress move forward with reform."

Tech companies have been amongst the biggest supporters of implementing change, as they believe they are losing out financially as the public becomes more suspicious about potential spying from the NSA, in the wake of whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations.

Richard Salgado, who is Google's director for law enforcement and information security, told a US Senate panel on November 13, 2014, that spying carried out by the NSA has "the great potential for doing serious damage to the competitiveness" of US companies such as Apple, Facebook and Microsoft. He added that "the trust that's threatened is essential to these businesses," Bloomberg News reported.


Comment: So we consumers/citizens, who use the products, support the companies, buy the stocks, invest in their respective futures and, in doing so, incur breach of privacy and continual monitoring by the NSA via these companies...they are concerned about us ($ and competitiveness). Besides abstinence, what choice do we have? And, do these companies really have a choice? Can we say "Smack Down?"


The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, a policy research group based in Washington, says that US companies may lose as much as $35 billion because the public has lost confidence in the security of their products.

"The potential fallout is pretty huge, given how much our economy depends on the information economy for its growth," said Rebecca MacKinnon, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, a Washington policy group, speaking to Bloomberg. "It's increasingly where the US advantage lies."
In their letter, the group said they want politicians to end the NSA's power to collect public data en masse, while transparency measures should also be introduced so both the government and private companies can tell the public what surveillance agencies may be collecting.
They are hoping to make a June 1 Congress deadline, which will see some aspects of the current Patriot Act up for renewal. One section includes a controversial provision, known as Section 215, which allows the NSA to collect phone records of almost all Americans.


Comment: Here is the gist of the letter and the signers:

March 25, 2015 We the undersigned represent a wide range of privacy and human rights advocates, technology companies, and trade associations that hold an equally wide range of positions on the issue of surveillance reform. Many of us have differing views on exactly what reforms must be included in any bill reauthorizing USA PATRIOT Act Section 215, which currently serves as the legal basis for the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata and is set to expire on June 1, 2015. That said, our broad, diverse, and bipartisan coalition believes that the status quo is untenable and that it is urgent that Congress move forward with reform.

Together, we agree that the following elements are essential to any legislative or Administration effort to reform our nation's surveillance laws:

- There must be a clear, strong, and effective end to bulk collection practices under the USA PATRIOT Act, including under the Section 215 records authority and the Section 214 authority regarding pen registers and trap & trace devices. Any collection that does occur under those authorities should have appropriate safeguards in place to protect privacy and users' rights.

- The bill must contain transparency and accountability mechanisms for both government and company reporting, as well as an appropriate declassification regime for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court decisions.

We believe addressing the above must be a part of any reform package, though there are other reforms that our groups and companies would welcome, and in some cases, believe are essential to any legislation. We also urge Congress to avoid adding new mandates that are controversial and could derail reform efforts.

It has been nearly two years since the first news stories revealed the scope of the United States' surveillance and bulk collection activities. Now is the time to take on meaningful legislative reforms to the nation's surveillance programs that maintain national security while preserving privacy, transparency, and accountability. We strongly encourage both the White House and Members of Congress to support the above reforms and oppose any efforts to enact any legislation that does not address them.

Thank you,

Access - Advocacy for Principled Action in Government American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - American Association of Law Libraries - American Booksellers for Free Expression American Civil Liberties Union - American Library Association - Application Developers Alliance - Association of Research Libraries - Brennan Center for Justice - Center for Democracy & Technology 8 CloudFlare, Inc. - Committee to Protect Journalists - Competitive Enterprise Institute - Computer & Communications Industry Association - The Constitution Project - Constitutional Alliance - Defending Dissent Foundation - DownsizeDC.org, Inc. - Electronic Frontier Foundation - Engine Advocacy - Free Press Action Fund - FreedomWorks - Global Network Initiative - Government Accountability Project - Hackers & Founders - Human Rights Watch - Internet Association - Internet Infrastructure Coalition - Liberty Coalition - Mozilla - National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers - New America's Open Technology Institute - Niskanen Center - OpenTheGovernment.org - PEN American Center - Project On Government Oversight - Public Knowledge - R Street - Reform Government Surveillance - ServInt - Silent Circle, LLC - Sonic - TechFreedom - Venture Politics - Wikimedia Foundation - World Press Freedom Committee


This is not the first time that tech giants have lobbied Congress to change the current spying laws. In November, their CEOs sent a letter to the Senate, asking lawmakers to demonstrate leadership and restore the confidence of internet users while keeping citizens safe.

"It's been a year since the first headlines alleging the extent of government surveillance on the Internet... We understand that governments have a duty to protect their citizens. But the balance in many countries has tipped too far in favor of the state and away from the rights of the individual. This undermines the freedoms we all cherish, and it must change," the letter's authors said.

However, they were unable to pass the motion as their attempts to reform the NSA were just two votes short of overcoming a filibuster in the Senate.

In December, Congress used a set of provisions to expand the surveillance of Americans by the NSA. The US government gave the agency what civil liberties advocates argue is an unprecedented authority to collect and store data belonging to American citizens.

In order to get the spending bill passed in December by the House, they had to remove a provision for NSA backdoor surveillance. They put the emphasis on tech companies to make sure that the products that they produced were more surveillance-friendly.

Also, under Section 309 of the Intelligence Authorization Act 2015, Congress allowed the government unprecedented access to have surveillance powers without a warrant, which would allow for "the acquisition, retention, and dissemination" of US phone and internet data.