Police brutality victim Miyekko Durden-Bosley
Seattle police officer Adley Shepherd responded to the scene of a domestic dispute in June 2014, where he arrested Miyekko Durden-Bosley, then 23. The woman allegedly became verbally abusive with the officer, and Shepherd can be heard accusing her of "escalating" the situation on camera. Shepherd handcuffed Durden-Bosley, and she appears to be tossed into the back of a patrol car.
Almost immediately after Durden-Bosley lands in the back seat Shepherd yells "She kicked me!" and lunges into the back seat of the car, on top of the woman, the video shows.
Shepherd punched Durden-Bosley so severely that she suffered a concussion and a broken orbital socket. Durden-Bosley told Seattle's KING5 that she had headaches and blurry vision from the punch seven months later. She told KING5 that she doesn't remember whether she kicked the officer.
The Washington state patrol, the Seattle-based federal US attorney and Seattle police launched investigations as a result of the incident, several media outlets reported. And amid high-profile cases of police brutality, such as the killing of unarmed teenager Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, Durden-Bosley's case has garnered significant public attention.
KING5 reported that the Washington state patrol found Shepherd's actions "inconsistent with the training and policy", and that "he unnecessarily placed himself in greater danger and caused unnecessary and foreseeable injury to the handcuffed suspect."
Nevertheless, in December, the King County prosecuting attorney Dan Satterberg declined to press charges against Shepherd (who remains on administrative leave), the Seattle Times reported . Satterberg said state law permits officers to use "all necessary means" to subdue an arrestee.
The claim filed with the city of Seattle is the precursor to a lawsuit against a government in Washington state. If the city refuses to settle the claim, Durden-Bosley's attorney can file a suit against the city.
Source: The Guardian
. . . but the individuals involved, directly and indirectly: the cop, the police chief, the mayor, perhaps others. Suing just the city means that the taxpayers will pick up the tab. If she also sues the individuals involved under the "color of law" statutes, then the individuals themselves will also (in addition to the city) be held legally liable and will have to pay awards out of their own pockets.
Having the taxpayers pick up the tab for police misbehavior, while appropriate and necessary from the POV of the victim being adequately compensated for the brutality, will NOT deter the actual police thugs from continuing these types of activities as they see no adverse consequences, i.e., they get paid leave during the investigation and then eventually go back to work, none the poorer for having committed their brutal acts. Absent the so-called "justice system" actually incarcerating these cops for such actions, the only way to curtail thuggish cop behavior is to hit them where it really hurts: their pocketbooks.